Drosophila Brain Tumor is a translational repressor.

The Drosophila brain tumor (brat) gene encodes a member of the conserved NHL family of proteins, which appear to regulate differentiation and growth in a variety of organisms. One of the founding family members, Caenorhabditis elegans LIN-41, is thought to control posttranscriptional gene expression. However, the mechanism by which LIN-41, or any other NHL protein, acts has not been clear. Using a yeast "four-hybrid" interaction assay, we show that Brain Tumor is recruited to hunchback (hb) mRNA through interactions with Nanos and Pumilio, which bind to the RNA to repress its translation. Interaction with the Nanos/Pumilio/RNA complex is mediated by the Brat NHL domain; single amino acid substitutions in this domain compromise quaternary complex assembly in vitro and hb regulation in vivo. Thus, recruitment of Brat is necessary for translational repression and the normal development of posterior embryonic pattern. In addition to regulating abdominal segmentation, previous genetic analysis has shown that Brat, Nanos, and Pumilio govern a variety of developmental processes. We examined the role of Brat in two of these processes-regulation of maternal Cyclin B mRNA in the embryo and regulation of imaginal disc development. The results of these experiments suggest that NHL domain proteins are recruited to various mRNAs by combinatorial protein-protein interactions.

[1]  E. Hafen,et al.  Genetic and biochemical characterization of dTOR, the Drosophila homolog of the target of rapamycin. , 2000, Genes & development.

[2]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres , 1988, Nature.

[3]  A. Shearn,et al.  Growth, metastasis, and invasiveness of Drosophila tumors caused by mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes , 1998, Development Genes and Evolution.

[4]  M. Yamada,et al.  Essential role of the posterior morphogen nanos for germline development in Drosophila , 1996, Nature.

[5]  R. Lehmann,et al.  The Pumilio protein binds RNA through a conserved domain that defines a new class of RNA-binding proteins. , 1997, RNA.

[6]  R. Wharton,et al.  Binding of pumilio to maternal hunchback mRNA is required for posterior patterning in drosophila embryos , 1995, Cell.

[7]  J. Yanowitz,et al.  Novel Functions of nanos in Downregulating Mitosis and Transcription during the Development of the Drosophila Germline , 1999, Cell.

[8]  M. Wickens,et al.  15 Translational Control of Developmental Decisions , 1996 .

[9]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[10]  Ruth Lehmann,et al.  The Drosophila posterior-group gene nanos functions by repressing hunchback activity , 1989, Nature.

[11]  G. Struhl,et al.  Differing strategies for organizing anterior and posterior body pattern in Drosophila embryos , 1989, Nature.

[12]  K. Bhat,et al.  The posterior determinant gene nanos is required for the maintenance of the adult germline stem cells during Drosophila oogenesis. , 1999, Genetics.

[13]  D. Frank,et al.  ncl-1 Is Required for the Regulation of Cell Size and Ribosomal RNA Synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  A. Kingsman,et al.  Efficient synthesis of enzymatically active calf chymosin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1983, Gene.

[15]  N. Gray,et al.  Control of translation initiation in animals. , 1998, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[16]  E. Hafen,et al.  Genetic control of cell size. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  T. P. Neufeld,et al.  Erratum: Regulation of imaginal disc cell size, cell number and organ size by Drosophila class I(A) phosphoinositide 3-kinase and its adaptor - (Current biology (1999) 9 (1019-1029)) , 1999 .

[18]  R. Hawley,et al.  Genetic studies of mei-P26 reveal a link between the processes that control germ cell proliferation in both sexes and those that control meiotic exchange in Drosophila. , 2000, Genetics.

[19]  G. Struhl,et al.  RNA regulatory elements mediate control of Drosophila body pattern by the posterior morphogen nanos , 1991, Cell.

[20]  E. Craig,et al.  Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. , 1996, Genetics.

[21]  Masashi Yamada,et al.  Maternal Pumilio acts together with Nanos in germline development in Drosophila embryos , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  D. Engelke,et al.  Yeast expression vectors using RNA polymerase III promoters. , 1994, Gene.

[23]  Antony Rodriguez,et al.  Identification of immune system and response genes, and novel mutations causing melanotic tumor formation in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[24]  D. Curtis,et al.  A CCHC metal‐binding domain in Nanos is essential for translational regulation , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Ruth Lehmann,et al.  Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila , 1991, Cell.

[26]  G. Seydoux,et al.  nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1999, Development.

[27]  D. Glover,et al.  Discrete sequence elements control posterior pole accumulation and translational repression of maternal cyclin B RNA in Drosophila. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[28]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Nanos and Pumilio have critical roles in the development and function of Drosophila germline stem cells. , 1998, Development.

[29]  G. Rubin,et al.  The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. , 1999, Genetics.

[30]  R. Wharton,et al.  Nanos interacts with cup in the female germline of Drosophila. , 2000, Development.

[31]  B. Cullen,et al.  Identification of a novel human zinc finger protein that specifically interacts with the activation domain of lentiviral Tat proteins. , 1995, Virology.

[32]  R. Lehmann,et al.  The maternal gene nanos has a central role in posterior pattern formation of the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Development.

[33]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology. , 1991, Genetics.

[34]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm–oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1999, Current Biology.

[35]  A. Shearn,et al.  Mutations in the β-propeller domain of the Drosophila brain tumor (brat) protein induce neoplasm in the larval brain , 2000, Oncogene.

[36]  R. Lehmann,et al.  A selective screen reveals discrete functional domains in Drosophila Nanos. , 1999, Genetics.

[37]  Stanley Fields,et al.  A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line , 1997, Nature.

[38]  R. Wharton,et al.  Recruitment of Nanos to hunchback mRNA by Pumilio. , 1999, Genes & development.

[39]  A. Spradling,et al.  A novel group of pumilio mutations affects the asymmetric division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. , 1997, Development.

[40]  B. Reinhart,et al.  The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2000, Nature.

[41]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Regulation of zygotic gene expression in Drosophila primordial germ cells , 1998, Current Biology.

[42]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Posterior segmentation of the Drosophila embryo in the absence of a maternal posterior organizer gene , 1989, Nature.

[43]  F. Slack,et al.  A novel repeat domain that is often associated with RING finger and B-box motifs. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[44]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Genetics of nanos localization in Drosophila , 1994, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[45]  T. P. Neufeld,et al.  Regulation of cellular growth by the Drosophila target of rapamycin dTOR. , 2000, Genes & development.

[46]  F. Slack,et al.  The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[47]  R. Wharton,et al.  The Pumilio RNA-binding domain is also a translational regulator. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[48]  M. Hentze,et al.  From factors to mechanisms: translation and translational control in eukaryotes. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[49]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Maternal effect mutations. , 1989, Genetics.

[50]  S. Vincent,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of a Novel RING Finger Protein That Interacts with Class V Myosins* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Involvement of the pumilio gene in the transport of an abdominal signal in the Drosophila embryo , 1987, Nature.

[52]  P. Rørth.  Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[53]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Pumilio is essential for function but not for distribution of the Drosophila abdominal determinant Nanos. , 1992, Genes & development.

[54]  S. Strickland,et al.  Nanos and pumilio establish embryonic polarity in Drosophila by promoting posterior deadenylation of hunchback mRNA. , 1997, Development.