Drivers’ Braking Behaviors in Different Motion Patterns of Vehicle-Bicycle Conflicts

Bicycling is one of the popular modes of transportation, but bicyclists are easily involved in injuries or fatalities in vehicle-bicycle (V-B) accidents. The AEB (Autonomous Emergency Braking) systems have been developed to avoid collisions, but their adaptiveness needs to be further improved under different motion patterns of V-B conflicts. This paper analyzes drivers’ braking behaviors in different motion patterns of V-B conflicts to improve the performance of Bicyclist-AEB systems. For safety and data reliability, a driving simulator was used to reconstruct two typical conflict types, i.e., SCR (a bicycle crossing the road from right in front of a straight going car) and SSR (a bicycle cut-in from right in front of a straight going car). Either conflict contained various parameterized motion patterns, which were characterized by a combination of parameters: (car velocity), TTC (time-to-collision), (bicycle velocity), and (lateral distance between the car and the bicycle) or (maximum lateral velocity of the bicycle). Some 26 licensed drivers participated in an orthogonal experiment for braking behavior analysis. Results revealed that drivers brake immediately when V-B conflicts occur; hence the BRT (brake reaction time) is independent of any motion pattern parameters. This was further verified by another orthogonal experiment with 10 participants using the eye tracking device. BRT in SSR is longer than that in SCR due to the less perceptible risk and drivers’ lower expectation of a collision. The braking intensity and brake Pedal Speed are higher in short-TTC patterns in both conflict types. Therefore, TTC is not a proper activation threshold but a reasonable indicator of braking intensity and Pedal Speed for driver-adaptive AEB systems. By applying the findings in the Bicyclist-AEB, the adaptiveness and acceptability of Bicyclist-AEB systems can be improved.

[1]  Ary P. Silvano,et al.  When Do Drivers Yield to Cyclists at Unsignalized Roundabouts? , 2015 .

[2]  Ming Chen,et al.  Drivers’ rear end collision avoidance behaviors under different levels of situational urgency , 2016 .

[3]  R Fredriksson,et al.  Pre-crash motion and conditions of bicyclist-to-car crashes in Sweden , 2014 .

[4]  H Summala,et al.  Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: an in-depth study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Guofa Li,et al.  Driver braking behavior analysis to improve autonomous emergency braking systems in typical Chinese vehicle-bicycle conflicts. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Lin Li,et al.  Driver Brake Parameters Analysis under Risk Scenarios with Pedalcyclist , 2016 .

[8]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Volvo Drivers’ Experiences With Advanced Crash Avoidance and Related Technologies , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Masahito Hitosugi,et al.  Analysis of car-to-bicycle approach patterns for developing active safety devices , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  Dizan Vasquez,et al.  A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles , 2014, ROBOMECH Journal.

[11]  Boris Antić,et al.  The analysis of influence of individual and environmental factors on 2-wheeled users’ injuries , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Krister Wolff,et al.  A Review of Near-Collision Driver Behavior Models , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Kees Maat,et al.  The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances , 2011 .

[15]  A Lie,et al.  Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Joanne M Wood,et al.  Drivers' and cyclists' experiences of sharing the road: incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Yasuhiro Matsui,et al.  Risks of Serious Injuries and Fatalities of Cyclists Associated with Impact Velocities of Cars in Car-Cyclist Accidents in Japan. , 2015, Stapp car crash journal.

[19]  Carlos Llorca,et al.  Motor vehicles overtaking cyclists on two-lane rural roads: analysis on speed and lateral clearance , 2014 .

[20]  S Y Sohn,et al.  Meta-analysis on total braking time. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[21]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[22]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[23]  Guofa Li,et al.  Effectiveness of Flashing Brake and Hazard Systems in Avoiding Rear-End Crashes , 2014 .

[24]  Gustav Markkula,et al.  A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.