Assessing the digital library research output: bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016

The purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to quantify the prominence and impact of published literature within the field. The research has been conducted with the intent of obtaining the expansion and characteristics of the literature on digital library.,More than 4,206 documents found in the period of 2002-2016 were collected from the ISI Web of Science and were analyzed to explore the annual productivity, yearly citation, most cited articles, prolific authors, eminent journals of the subject, productivity of institutes and contribution of countries. These results are based on the types of documents (articles, reviews, proceedings papers, book reviews, editorial materials and book chapters).,The core findings are that the most productive year of publication was 2016, and the growth of citation increased rapidly; the top source of title is electronic library. The result shows that the USA dominates in the research output, with Illinois University securing the first position; the most prolific author is Fourie I from South Africa. In the document types category, the most cited sources are research articles.,This research is useful for the researchers interested in the field of bibliometrics as it postulates an inclusive indication of provenance in the field of library and information science.

[1]  Abdullah Abrizah,et al.  The cautious faculty: their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories , 2017 .

[2]  Moin Ahmad,et al.  A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[3]  Corrinne Rebecca Kennedy Bibliometric Study of Scholarly Writing and Publishing Patterns Concerning Copyright and Digital Images , 2015, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America.

[4]  Harish Chander,et al.  Publication trends in library and information science: A bibliometric analysis of Library Management journal , 2014 .

[5]  T. Luukkonen,et al.  Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. , 1990, Annals of medicine.

[6]  J. Hurd,et al.  Publication patterns of U.S. academic librarians from 1998 to 2002 , 2006 .

[7]  Ming-Yueh Tsay A Bibliometric Analysis on the Journal of Information Science , 2011 .

[8]  Danuta Ryś,et al.  Bibliometrics and academic staff assessment in Polish university libraries - current trends , 2016 .

[9]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index expanded™ , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  N. Robinson,et al.  A review of the use of complementary and alternative medicine and HIV: issues for patient care. , 2013, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[11]  Dae Young Yoon,et al.  The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  Khalid Mahmood,et al.  Use of Bibliometrics in LIS Research , 2009 .

[13]  Bruce Slutsky,et al.  Bibliometric Analysis and Comparison of Two STEM LIS Journals: Science & Technology Libraries and Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship (2005–2014) , 2016 .

[14]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[15]  Johan A. Wallin,et al.  The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? , 2015, Scientometrics.

[16]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Bibliometrics to webometrics , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  A. N. Zainab,et al.  Bibliometric studies on single journals: a review , 2009 .

[18]  Dragan Ivanovic,et al.  Highly cited articles in the Information Science and Library Science category in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis , 2016, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Susan K. Burke,et al.  Academic Librarians’ Knowledge of Bibliometrics and Altmetrics , 2016 .

[20]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  Andrea Rey-Martí,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[22]  Muhammad Azam Tahir,et al.  A Study to Analyze Collaboration Patterns for Asian Library and Information Science (LIS) Scholars on Author, Institutional and Country Levels , 2016 .

[23]  Ming-yueh Tsay,et al.  Journal bibliometric analysis: a case study on the Journal of Documentation , 2011, J. Documentation.