Directed evolution of protein enzymes using nonhomologous random recombination.

We recently reported the development of nonhomologous random recombination (NRR) as a method for nucleic acid diversification and applied NRR to the evolution of DNA aptamers. Here, we describe a modified method, protein NRR, that enables proteins to access diversity previously difficult or impossible to generate. We investigated the structural plasticity of protein folds and the ability of helical motifs to function in different contexts by applying protein NRR and in vivo selection to the evolution of chorismate mutase (CM) enzymes. Functional CM mutants evolved using protein NRR contained many insertions, deletions, and rearrangements. The distribution of these changes was not random but clustered in certain regions of the protein. Topologically rearranged but functional enzymes also emerged from these studies, indicating that multiple connectivities can accommodate a functional CM active site and demonstrating the ability to generate new domain connectivities through protein NRR. Protein NRR was also used to randomly recombine CM and fumarase, an unrelated but also alpha-helical protein. Whereas the resulting library contained fumarase fragments in many contexts before functional selection, library members surviving selection for CM activity invariably contained a CM core with fumarase sequences found only at the termini or in one loop. These results imply that internal helical fragments cannot be swapped between these proteins without the loss of nearly all CM activity. Our findings suggest that protein NRR will be useful in probing the functional requirements of enzymes and in the creation of new protein topologies.

[1]  Patricia C. Babbitt,et al.  Understanding Enzyme Superfamilies , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  David R. Liu,et al.  Mutagenesis Study of Active Site Residues in Chorismate Mutase from Bacillus subtilis , 1996 .

[3]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  Searching sequence space for protein catalysts , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Volker Sieber,et al.  Libraries of hybrid proteins from distantly related sequences , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Directed evolution of the site specificity of Cre recombinase , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Deem,et al.  A hierarchical approach to protein molecular evolution. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  W. Lim,et al.  Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of λrepresser , 1989, Nature.

[8]  G D Schuler,et al.  A workbench for multiple alignment construction and analysis , 1991, Proteins.

[9]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Probing the role of the C-terminus of Bacillus subtilis chorismate mutase by a novel random protein-termination strategy. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[10]  Paul E O'Maille,et al.  Structure-based combinatorial protein engineering (SCOPE). , 2002, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[11]  D. Hilvert,et al.  A small, thermostable, and monofunctional chorismate mutase from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[12]  Marc Ostermeier,et al.  A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  W. Stemmer Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling , 1994, Nature.

[14]  B. Ganem,et al.  Mapping of chorismate mutase and prephenate dehydrogenase domains in the Escherichia coli T-protein. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[15]  C D Maranas,et al.  Creating multiple-crossover DNA libraries independent of sequence identity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  David R. Liu,et al.  Nucleic acid evolution and minimization by nonhomologous random recombination , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Stephen J Benkovic,et al.  Enhanced crossover SCRATCHY: construction and high-throughput screening of a combinatorial library containing multiple non-homologous crossovers. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Improved Green Fluorescent Protein by Molecular Evolution Using DNA Shuffling , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  P G Schultz,et al.  Expanding the Genetic Code of Escherichia coli , 2001, Science.

[20]  H. Yanagawa,et al.  Random multi-recombinant PCR for the construction of combinatorial protein libraries. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Exploring sequence constraints on an interhelical turn using in vivo selection for catalytic activity , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Exploring the active site of chorismate mutase by combinatorial mutagenesis and selection: the importance of electrostatic catalysis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Redesigning enzyme topology by directed evolution. , 1998, Science.

[24]  D. Hilvert,et al.  A Strategically Positioned Cation Is Crucial for Efficient Catalysis by Chorismate Mutase* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  L. Banaszak,et al.  Crystallographic studies of the catalytic and a second site in fumarase C from Escherichia coli. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[26]  P. Karplus,et al.  ATOMIC-STRUCTURE OF THE BURIED CATALYTIC POCKET OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI CHORISMATE MUTASE. , 1995 .

[27]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  General method for sequence-independent site-directed chimeragenesis. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.