Measurement of the internal state of a single atom without energy exchange

A measurement necessarily changes the quantum state being measured, a phenomenon known as back-action. Real measurements, however, almost always cause a much stronger back-action than is required by the laws of quantum mechanics. Quantum non-demolition measurements have been devised that keep the additional back-action entirely within observables other than the one being measured. However, this back-action on other observables often imposes its own constraints. In particular, free-space optical detection methods for single atoms and ions (such as the shelving technique, a sensitive and well-developed method) inevitably require spontaneous scattering, even in the dispersive regime. This causes irreversible energy exchange (heating), which is a limitation in atom-based quantum information processing, where it obviates straightforward reuse of the qubit. No such energy exchange is required by quantum mechanics. Here we experimentally demonstrate optical detection of an atomic qubit with significantly less than one spontaneous scattering event. We measure the transmission and reflection of an optical cavity containing the atom. In addition to the qubit detection itself, we quantitatively measure how much spontaneous scattering has occurred. This allows us to relate the information gained to the amount of spontaneous emission, and we obtain a detection error below 10 per cent while scattering less than 0.2 photons on average. Furthermore, we perform a quantum Zeno-type experiment to quantify the measurement back-action, and find that every incident photon leads to an almost complete state collapse. Together, these results constitute a full experimental characterization of a quantum measurement in the ‘energy exchange-free’ regime below a single spontaneous emission event. Besides its fundamental interest, this approach could significantly simplify proposed neutral-atom quantum computation schemes, and may enable sensitive detection of molecules and atoms lacking closed transitions.

[1]  Tilo Steinmetz,et al.  A fiber Fabry–Perot cavity with high finesse , 2010, 1005.0067.

[2]  D. Hunger,et al.  Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip , 2007, Nature.

[3]  L. Lugiato.  Theory of Optical Bistability , 1982 .

[4]  C. Monroe,et al.  Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions , 2003 .

[5]  S. Gleyzes,et al.  Nondestructive Rydberg atom counting with mesoscopic fields in a cavity. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  Pedram Khalili Amiri,et al.  Quantum computers , 2003 .

[7]  Helmut Ritsch,et al.  Mechanical effects of light in optical resonators , 2003 .

[8]  Herzog,et al.  Interaction-free measurement. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[9]  Archil Avaliani,et al.  Quantum Computers , 2004, ArXiv.

[10]  Philippe Grangier,et al.  Quantum non-demolition measurements in optics , 1998, Nature.

[11]  J. Raimond,et al.  Exploring the Quantum , 2006 .

[12]  Todd A. Brun,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2011, Computer Science, The Hardware, Software and Heart of It.

[13]  W. M. Itano,et al.  Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox , 2006 .

[14]  G. Rempe,et al.  Trapping and observing single atoms in a blue-detuned intracavity dipole trap. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[15]  G. Rempe,et al.  Lossless state detection of single neutral atoms. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Hennrich,et al.  Quantum interference from remotely trapped ions , 2008, 0810.1847.

[17]  Vladimir B. Braginsky,et al.  Quantum Measurement , 1992 .

[18]  C. Helstrom.  Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1969 .

[19]  Paul D. Lett,et al.  Ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy: Long-range molecules and atomic scattering , 2006 .

[20]  Tilo Steinmetz,et al.  Cavity-based single atom preparation and high-fidelity hyperfine state readout. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[21]  W. Alt,et al.  Quantum jumps and spin dynamics of interacting atoms in a strongly coupled atom-cavity system. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  General limit to nondestructive optical detection of atoms (6 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0409160.

[23]  A. D. Boozer,et al.  Cooling to the ground state of axial motion for one atom strongly coupled to an optical cavity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[24]  D. Wineland,et al.  High-fidelity adaptive qubit detection through repetitive quantum nondemolition measurements. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[25]  J. E. Mooij,et al.  Quantum non-demolition measurement of a superconducting two-level system , 2007 .

[26]  H. Chernoff.  A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations , 1952 .

[27]  J. Raimond,et al.  Seeing a single photon without destroying it , 1999, Nature.

[28]  W. Ames.  Mathematics in Science and Engineering , 1999 .