The “effect procargo” on technical and scale efficiency at airports: The case of Spanish airports (2009–2011)

This paper studies the “effect procargo” (or effect of the proportion of cargo traffic relative to total traffic) on technical and scale efficiency at airports. To this end, using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology, a comparative technical efficiency analysis is developed for 35 Spanish airports over the 2009 to 2011 period. In a second stage, using Tobit regression, we analysed the effects of airport size, low-cost carrier (LCC) presence, and cargo traffic on efficiency. The results suggest that cargo traffic has a positive impact on the technical and scale efficiency of Spanish airport operations. Airports with a higher share of cargo traffic are expected to have higher overall technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency, in comparison to airports with a lower share.

[1]  R. R. Martín-Cejas,et al.  Are outsourcing and non-aeronautical revenues important drivers in the efficiency of Spanish airports? , 2009 .

[2]  J. Tobin.  Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .

[3]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Airports in Latin America , 2010 .

[4]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[6]  Hans-Martin Niemeier,et al.  A Survey of Empirical Research on the Productivity and Efficiency Measurement of Airports , 2013 .

[7]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization , 2001 .

[8]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008, Oper. Res..

[9]  N. Adler,et al.  Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effects on the performance of the world's major airports , 2006 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: With application to European railways , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  C Murillo-Melchor,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY CHANGES IN SPANISH AIRPORTS USING THE MALMQUIST INDEX , 1999 .

[13]  C. Piga,et al.  Low-cost carriers and airports’ performance: empirical evidence from a panel of UK airports , 2013 .

[14]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  A stochastic frontier analysis to estimate the relative efficiency of Spanish airports , 2009 .

[15]  Rachita Gulati,et al.  Evaluation of technical efficiency and ranking of public sector banks in India: An analysis from cross‐sectional perspective , 2008 .

[16]  T. Oum,et al.  ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF RAILWAYS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE OECD COUNTRIES' RAILWAYS. IN: RAILWAYS , 2002 .

[17]  R. R. Martín-Cejas,et al.  Technical efficiency and productivity changes in Spanish airports: A parametric distance functions approach , 2010 .

[18]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[19]  T. Oum,et al.  A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world's major airports: summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking research report—2002 , 2003 .

[20]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  David Gillen,et al.  DEVELOPING MEASURES OF AIRPORT PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[22]  Miguel Ángel Pesquera,et al.  Logistic Platforms and Eficiency of Road Haulage in Europe (2004-2012) , 2014 .

[23]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations , 2003 .

[24]  David A. Hensher,et al.  MEASURING TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY OF AIRPORTS -- AN INDEX NUMBER APPROACH , 1997 .

[25]  Y. Yoshida,et al.  JAPANESE-AIRPORT BENCHMARKING WITH THE DEA AND ENDOGENOUS-WEIGHT TFP METHODS: TESTING THE CRITICISM OF OVERINVESTMENT IN JAPANESE REGIONAL AIRPORTS , 2004 .

[26]  F. Nelson,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE TWO-LIMIT PROBIT REGRESSION MODEL , 1975 .

[27]  A. Zhang,et al.  Effects of competition and policy changes on Chinese airport productivity: An empirical investigation , 2008 .

[28]  F Salazar de la Cruz.  A DEA APPROACH TO THE AIRPORT PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1999 .

[29]  Miguel Ángel Pesquera,et al.  Small is beautiful? The impact of economic crisis, low cost carriers, and size on efficiency in Spanish airports (2009–2011) , 2014 .

[30]  M. Abbott,et al.  Total Factor Productivity and Efficiency of Australian Airports , 2002 .

[31]  Yuichiro Yoshida,et al.  ENDOGENOUS-WEIGHT TFP MEASUREMENT: METHODOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION TO JAPANESE-AIRPORT BENCHMARKING , 2004 .

[32]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .