A morphing aerofoil with highly controllable aerodynamic performance

In this paper, a morphing carbon fibre composite aerofoil concept with an active trailing edge is proposed. This aerofoil features of camber morphing with multiple degrees of freedom. The shape morphing is enabled by an innovative structure driven by an electrical actuation system that uses linear ultrasonic motors (LUSM) with compliant runners, enabling full control of multiple degrees of freedom. The compliant runners also serve as structural components that carry the aerodynamic load and maintain a smooth skin curvature. The morphing structure with compliant truss is shown to exhibit a satisfactory flexibility and loading capacity in both numerical simulations and static loading tests. This design is capable of providing a pitching moment control independent of lift and higher L/D ratios within a wider angle-of-attack range. Such multiple morphing configurations could expand the flight envelope of future unmanned aerial vehicles. A small prototype is built to illustrate the concept, but as no off-the-shelf LUSMs can be integrated into this benchtop model, two servos are employed as actuators, providing two controlled degrees of freedom.

[1]  Ira H. Abbott,et al.  Summary of Airfoil Data , 1945 .

[2]  Hermann F. Fasel,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Separation for Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2010 .

[3]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Numerical and experimental validation of a morphed wing geometry using Price-Païdoussis wind-tunnel testing* , 2016, The Aeronautical Journal.

[4]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Adaptive and Controllable Compliant Systems With Embedded Actuators and Sensors , 2009 .

[5]  Gregory P. Carman,et al.  Smart material actuators for airfoil morphing applications , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Carl P. Tilmann,et al.  Design and application of compliant mechanisms for morphing aircraft structures , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[7]  Joachim Peinke,et al.  Dynamic lift measurements on a FX79W151A airfoil via pressure distribution on the wind tunnel walls , 2007 .

[8]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Numerical simulation and wind tunnel tests investigation and validation of a morphing wing-tip demonstrator aerodynamic performance , 2016 .

[9]  Eastman N Jacobs,et al.  Airfoil section characteristics as affected by protuberances , 1932 .

[10]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Aerodynamic performance improvement of the UAS-S4 Éhecatl morphing airfoil using novel optimization techniques , 2016 .

[11]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Freestream Velocity Corrections for Two-Dimensional Testing with Splitter Plates , 1997 .

[12]  Gregory F Ervin,et al.  Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing – Design , Fabrication and Flight Test , 2009 .

[13]  Vladimir Brailovski,et al.  Design of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators for Morphing Laminar Wing With Flexible Extrados , 2009 .

[14]  Youssef Mébarki,et al.  Numerical optimization and experimental testing of a morphing wing with aileron system , 2016 .

[15]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Development of High-rate, Adaptive Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model , 2004 .

[16]  D. W. Holder,et al.  Wind-tunnel technique : an account of experimental methods in low- and high-speed wind tunnels , 1952 .

[17]  L. F. Campanile,et al.  The Belt-Rib Concept: A Structronic Approach to Variable Camber , 2000 .

[18]  Ralph C. Smith,et al.  Smart material systems - model development , 2005, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[19]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Improving the UAS-S4 Éhecal airfoil high angles-of-attack performance characteristics using a morphing wing approach , 2016 .

[20]  C. M. Wayman,et al.  The two-way shape memory effect and other “training” phenomena in CuZn single crystals , 1977 .

[21]  Onur Bilgen,et al.  Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept , 2014 .

[22]  Douglas K. Lindner,et al.  Power Systems and Requirements for Integration of Smart Structures into Aircraft , 2004 .

[23]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Optimization of an Unmanned Aerial System' Wing Using a Flexible Skin Morphing Wing , 2013 .

[24]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[25]  Hermann F. Fasel,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Separation and Separation Control on a Laminar Airfoil , 2008 .

[26]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Development of a Shape-Memory-Alloy Actuated Biomimetic Hydrofoil , 2002 .

[27]  L. F. Campanile,et al.  Aerodynamic and aeroelastic amplification in adaptive belt-rib airfoils , 2005 .