Studies with spike initiators: linearization by noise allows continuous signal modulation in neural networks

It is shown that noise can be an important element in the translation of neuronal generator potentials (summed inputs) to neuronal spike trains (outputs), creating or expanding a range of amplitudes over which the spike rate is proportional to the generator potential amplitude. Noise converts the basically nonlinear operation of a spoke initiator into a nearly linear modulation process. This linearization effect of noise is examined in a simple intuitive model of a static threshold and in a more realistic computer simulation of spike initiator based on the Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) model. The results are qualitatively similar; in each case larger noise amplitude results in a larger range of nearly linear modulation. The computer simulation of the HH model with noise shows linear and nonlinear features that were earlier observed in spike data obtained from the VIIIth nerve of the bullfrog. This suggests that these features can be explained in terms of spike initiator properties, and it also suggests that the HH model may be useful for representing basic spike initiator properties in vertebrates.<<ETX>>

[1]  J. Connor,et al.  Neural repetitive firing: modifications of the Hodgkin-Huxley axon suggested by experimental results from crustacean axons. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[2]  P. Schwindt,et al.  Active currents in mammalian central neurons , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  J. Rinzel On repetitive activity in nerve. , 1978, Federation proceedings.

[4]  J. Rinzel,et al.  HOPF BIFURCATION TO REPETITIVE ACTIVITY IN NERVE , 1983 .

[5]  D. AGIN,et al.  Hodgkin-Huxley Equations: Logarithmic Relation between Membrane Current and Frequency of Repetitive Activity , 1964, Nature.

[6]  W. Levick,et al.  Statistical analysis of the dark discharge of lateral geniculate neurones , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  C. Stevens,et al.  Synaptic noise and other sources of randomness in motoneuron interspike intervals. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The frequency of nerve action potentials generated by applied currents , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[11]  A S French,et al.  A flexible neural analog using integrated circuits. , 1970, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[12]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  A. S. French,et al.  The frequency response, coherence, and information capacity of two neuronal models. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Acute seismic sensitivity in the bullfrog ear , 1982, Brain Research.

[15]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Speculations about noise and the evolution of vertebrate hearing , 1987, Hearing Research.

[16]  R A Chapman Repetitive responses in squid giant axons and their premature annihilation by additional brief depolarizing currents. , 1980, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[17]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[18]  R. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987, IEEE ASSP Magazine.