Quantifying energy savings in daylight responsive systems : The role of dimming electronic ballasts

The application of lighting control technologies with photosensors has led to an increase in public interest. Although these technologies have been promoted during the last years their successful use in buildings has been accomplished in a small percentage of new projects. One reason is the difficulty in quantifying the energy savings and thus the subsequent payback period. Daylight responsive dimming systems consist of three basic components: photosensor, controller, and dimming unit. Electronic dimming ballast (EDB) is one substantial component of these lighting control systems which can adjust the light output due to the transferred signal from the photosensor and lighting controller. The aim of this study is to quantify energy savings among different EDBs. Eighteen commercial EDBs were selected and various sets of electrical and illuminance measurements were taken for different dimming levels, in order to develop polynomial functions between light output and consumed power. Using the measured data, a set of simulations were performed for a photosensor with an ideal cosine spatial sensitivity distribution installed in a typical office room using two control algorithms, closed loop and integral reset, trying to quantify the relative differences in energy savings.

[1]  David L. DiLaura.  Calculation of Occluded Diffuse and Nondiffuse Radiative Exchange Form Factors , 2006 .

[2]  Andrew Bierman,et al.  Characterizing Daylight Photosensor System Performance to Help Overcome Market Barriers , 2000 .

[3]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[4]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  The New York Times headquarters daylighting mockup: Monitored performance of the daylighting control system , 2006 .

[5]  R. G. Mistrick,et al.  A Comparison of Photosensor-Controlled Electronic Dimming Systems in a Small Office , 2000 .

[6]  R. G. Mistrick,et al.  Analysis of Daylight Photocell Placement and View in a Small Office , 1997 .

[7]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Lighting and energy performance for an office using high frequency dimming controls , 2006 .

[8]  R. G. Mistrick,et al.  A Study of Daylight-Responsive Photosensor Control in Five Daylighted Classrooms , 2005 .

[9]  An-Seop Choi,et al.  Development of a daylight responsive dimming system and preliminary evaluation of system performance , 2000 .

[10]  A.-s Choi,et al.  Analysis of daylight responsive dimming system performance , 1998 .

[11]  R. R. Verderber,et al.  Mutual impacts of lighting controls and daylighting applications , 1984 .

[12]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  Improving the performance of photo-electrically controlled lighting systems , 1989 .

[13]  R. G. Mistrick,et al.  A Study of Photosensor Configuration and Performance in a Daylighted Classroom Space , 2003 .

[14]  Francis Rubinstein,et al.  Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed , 1999 .

[15]  Francis Rubinstein,et al.  Photoelectric control of equi-illumination lighting systems , 1984 .

[16]  Konstantinos Papamichael,et al.  A method for simulating the performance of photosensor-based lighting controls , 2002 .

[17]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Evaluation of lighting performance in office buildings with daylighting controls , 2001 .

[18]  Francis Rubinstein,et al.  On the Calibration and Commissioning of Lighting Controls , 1997 .

[19]  An-Seop Choi,et al.  On the Prediction of Energy Savings for a Daylight Dimming System , 1997 .

[20]  An-Seop Choi,et al.  The characteristics of photosensors and electronic dimming ballasts in daylight responsive dimming systems , 2005 .