Application of an Extended TAM Model for Online Banking Adoption: A Study at a Gulf-region University

The understanding of factors leading to the acceptance or rejection of information systems IS is important and relevant. Although there have been studies examining the adoption of Internet Banking IB, research on this topic in the Gulf context and from an IS perspective is lacking, even though societal factors are acknowledged as having an impact on technology adoption. To fill this gap, this paper uses a version of the Technology Acceptance Model TAM, extended by the compatibility and trust constructs. An empirical study, using students from a large university in the region, validates the research model.

[1]  Yazan Khalid Abed Allah Migdadi.  The Quality of Internet Banking Service Encounter in Jordan , 2008 .

[2]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[3]  F. Deane,et al.  Relationship between Self-Report and Log Data Estimates of Information System Usage. , 1998 .

[4]  Nafis Alam,et al.  An Evaluation Of Internet Banking Sites In Islamic Countries , 2003 .

[5]  R. P. Sundarraj,et al.  Using information-systems constructs to study online- and telephone-banking technologies , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[6]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[9]  David Jones,et al.  Predicting System Success using the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study , 2005 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  Kym Mawson-Lee.  The Online Effect: Transitioning from the Legacy Help Desk to the Online Task Management System , 2006, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[16]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  ON THE MULTI-DIMENSIONAL NATURE OF COMPATIBILITY BELIEFS IN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE , 1998 .

[17]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Statistics : methods and applications : a comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining , 2006 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[20]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[24]  Guy Paré,et al.  Discretionary use of personal computers by knowledge workers: testing of a social psychology theoretical model , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Charles Møller,et al.  Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology , 2005 .

[26]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  M.H.P. Kleijnen,et al.  Consumer acceptance of wireless finance , 2004 .

[28]  Sue A Hill,et al.  Chapter 18 – Statistics , 2006 .

[29]  Quantitative Evaluation of the Internet Banking Service Encounter's Quality: Comparative Study between Jordan and the UK Retail Banks. , 2008 .

[30]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users , 2003 .

[31]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[32]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study , 1999 .

[33]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Margaret Tan,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[36]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Agent- and Web-Based Employment Marketspaces in the U.S. Department of Defense , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[37]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  Critical factors of WAP services adoption: an empirical study , 2003, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[38]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[40]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[41]  John Shine,et al.  Extending the New Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the End User Information Systems Satisfaction in a Mandatory Environment: A Bank's Treasury , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..