An Analysis of Genetic Changes during the Divergence of Drosophila Species

Background It has been long appreciated that speciation involves changes in body plans and establishes genetic, reproductive, developmental and behavioral incompatibilities between populations. However, little is still known about the genetic components involved in these changes or the sequence and scale of events that lead to the differentiation of species. Principal Findings In this paper, we investigated the genetic changes in three closely related species of Drosophila by making pair-wise comparisons of their genomes. We focused our analysis on the modern relatives of the alleles likely to be segregating in pre-historic populations at the time or after the ancestor of D. simulans became separated from the ancestor of D. melanogaster. Some of these genes were previously implicated in the genetics of reproduction and behavior while the biological functions of others are not yet clear. Conclusions Together these results identify different classes of genes that might have participated in the beginning of segregation of these species millions of years ago in Africa.

[1]  A. Sturtevant,et al.  Contributions to the genetics of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster , 1929 .

[2]  Calvin B. Bridges,et al.  SALIVARY CHROMOSOME MAPSWith a Key to the Banding of the Chromosomes of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1935 .

[3]  I. H. Horton A Comparison of the Salivary Gland Chromosomes of Drosophila Melanogaster and D. Simulans. , 1939, Genetics.

[4]  E. Hadorn Zur Autonomie und Phasenspezifität der Letalität von Bastarden zwischen Drosophila melanogaster und Drosophila simulans , 1961 .

[5]  B. S. Baker,et al.  Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[6]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora) - II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  Takao K. Watanabe,et al.  Mating Preference and the Direction of Evolution in Drosophila , 1979, Science.

[8]  Takao K. Watanabe A gene that rescues the lethal hybrids between. Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. , 1979 .

[9]  M. Ashburner,et al.  THE REPRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS OF DROSOPHILA SECHELLIA WITH D. MAURITIANA, D. SIMULANS, AND D. MELANOGASTER FROM THE AFROTROPICAL REGION , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  M. Ashburner,et al.  A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between sibling species of Drosophila. , 1990, Genetics.

[11]  M. Yamamoto,et al.  Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster. , 1993, Genetics.

[12]  T. Watanabe,et al.  Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. I. The maternal hybrid rescue (mhr) gene of Drosophila simulans. , 1993, Genetics.

[13]  M. Wolfner,et al.  New genes for male accessory gland proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[14]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The developmental genetics of hybrid inviability: a mitotic defect in Drosophila hybrids. , 1997, Genetics.

[15]  P. Wirtz Mother species–father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  J. Carlson,et al.  Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[17]  M. Tomaru,et al.  COURTSHIP SONG RECOGNITION IN THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER COMPLEX: HETEROSPECIFIC SONGS MAKE FEMALES RECEPTIVE IN D. MELANOGASTER, BUT NOT IN D. SECHELLIA , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  COURTSHIP SONG RECOGNITION IN THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER COMPLEX: HETEROSPECIFIC SONGS MAKE FEMALES RECEPTIVE IN D. MELANOGASTER, BUT NOT IN D. SECHELLIA , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  J. Locke,et al.  Whole arm inversions of chromosome 4 in Drosophila species , 2001, Chromosoma.

[20]  T. Chapman Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila , 2001, Heredity.

[21]  K. Galindo,et al.  A large family of divergent Drosophila odorant-binding proteins expressed in gustatory and olfactory sensilla. , 2001, Genetics.

[22]  Á. Acebes,et al.  Species-specific effects of single sensillum ablation on mating position in Drosophila , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  T. Karr,et al.  Genetics of Hybrid Inviability and Sterility in Drosophila: Dissection of Introgression of D. simulans Genes in D. melanogaster Genome , 2004, Genetica.

[24]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora) , 1984, Chromosoma.

[25]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  L. Sánchez,et al.  Development of imaginal discs from lethal hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila mauritiana , 2004, Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology.

[27]  Masatoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Cytogenetical localization of Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr), a Drosophila melanogaster gene that rescues interspecific hybrids from embryonic lethality , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[28]  Masatoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Hybrid lethal systems in theDrosophila melanogaster species complex , 2006, Genetica.

[29]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Gene Transposition as a Cause of Hybrid Sterility in Drosophila , 2006, Science.

[30]  Jun Wang,et al.  Two Dobzhansky-Muller Genes Interact to Cause Hybrid Lethality in Drosophila , 2006, Science.

[31]  K. McKim,et al.  mei-38 Is Required for Chromosome Segregation During Meiosis in Drosophila Females , 2008, Genetics.

[32]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila , 2008, Nature.