Bridging the Gap between Eco-Design and the Human Thinking System

Technological progress has enabled widespread adoption and use of consumer electronics, changing how global society lives and works. This progress has come with immense environmental cost, including extraction of scarce materials, consumption of fossil fuels, and growing e-waste challenges. Eco-design has emerged as a promising approach to reduce the environmental footprint of electronics by integrating sustainability-oriented decisions early in the product realization process. However, most approaches focus on the product itself, not on the consumer who ultimately decides how to purchase, use, maintain, and dispose of the device. This article presents a new framework to guide designers in developing products with features that encourage consumers to use them in an environmentally sustainable manner. The Sustainable Behavior Design (SBD) framework links common design concepts (ergonomic, emotional, preventative, and interaction design) with core aspects of the human thinking system to create features to make users aware of their behavior and decisions (reflective thinking) or result in sustainable behaviors even when users are unaware (automatic thinking). The SBD framework is demonstrated using a case study on a smartphone, a high demand product. The reimagined smartphone design integrates solutions addressing both automatic and reflective thinking systems, potentially reducing life cycle impacts by almost 30%.

[1]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[2]  Khai N. Truong,et al.  Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones , 2008, CHI.

[3]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Design for the Environment , 1996 .

[4]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The Design with Intent Method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Designing for consumers: editorial , 1998 .

[7]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Evolution of product lifespan and implications for environmental assessment and management: a case study of personal computers in higher education. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Praima CHAYUTSAHAKIJ,et al.  Human Centered Design Innovation , 2003 .

[9]  Casper Boks Design for Sustainable Behaviour Research Challenges , 2012 .

[10]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[11]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  Human factors in product design : current practice and future trends , 1999 .

[12]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions , 2009 .

[13]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Consumption-weighted life cycle assessment of a consumer electronic product community. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Can HF/E Professionals Contribute to Global Climate Change Solutions? , 2014 .

[15]  Casper Boks,et al.  User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[16]  Ilona Santavaara,et al.  NOKIA’S PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OVER THE YEARS, INCLUDING CHALLENGES AND KEY FINDINGS , 2013 .

[17]  Perrine Chancerel,et al.  Recycling-oriented characterization of small waste electrical and electronic equipment. , 2009, Waste management.

[18]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2011 .

[19]  E. Williams,et al.  Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States , 2008 .

[20]  Stewart Hickey,et al.  Sustainable life cycle engineering of an integrated desktop PC; a small to medium enterprise perspective , 2014 .

[21]  E. Williams,et al.  The 1.7 kilogram microchip: energy and material use in the production of semiconductor devices. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Thomas Walton,et al.  Building Design Strategy: Using Design to Achieve Key Business Objectives , 2008 .

[23]  Debra Lilley,et al.  Integrating ethics into design for sustainable behaviour , 2013 .

[24]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Attachments to objects , 2015 .

[25]  René M.J. Benders,et al.  Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input–output energy analysis: A comparison of methods and a discussion of results , 2006 .

[26]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[27]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  Personalizing product appearance: the effect on product attachment , 2004 .

[28]  Anneli Selvefors,et al.  Design for sustainable consumption behaviour: systematising the use of behavioural intervention strategies , 2011, DPPI.

[29]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Some consideration on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[30]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Status and Future Directions of the ENERGY STAR Program , 2000 .

[31]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[32]  C. Boks,et al.  How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: the environmental implications , 2005, 2005 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[33]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Integrating Emotional Attachment and Sustainability in Electronic Product Design , 2013 .

[34]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Operational Electricity Use in the ICT and Entertainment & Media Sectors , 2010 .

[35]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: hybrid assessment combining process and economic input-output methods. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Marc J. de Vries Ethics and the complexity of technology : A design approach , 2006 .

[37]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Conflict minerals in the compute sector: estimating extent of tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold use in ICT products. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Community Ecology Perspectives on the Structural and Functional Evolution of Consumer Electronics , 2014 .

[39]  Frank Honold,et al.  Broken display = broken interface': the impact of display damage on smartphone interaction , 2014, CHI.

[40]  T. Bhamra,et al.  Towards instinctive sustainable product use , 2005 .

[41]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Digital Design for Sustainable Behaviour: A conceptual framework to guide design intervention , 2012 .

[42]  Lorenz Erdmann,et al.  Expected Environmental Impacts of Pervasive Computing , 2004 .

[43]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  Design for Sustainability: Current Trends in Sustainable Product Design and Development , 2009 .

[44]  Marcus Hanratty Design for Sustainable Behaviour: a conceptual model and intervention selection model for changing behaviour through design. , 2015 .

[45]  Hilary Nixon,et al.  How Much E-waste Is There in Us Basements and Attics? Results from a National Survey , 2022 .

[46]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[47]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Making the user more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[48]  Jon Kolko,et al.  Thoughts on Interaction Design , 2009 .

[49]  Renee Wever Editorial: Design Research for Sustainable Behaviour , 2012 .

[50]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Economic-balance hybrid LCA extended with uncertainty analysis: case study of a laptop computer , 2011 .

[51]  Tracey Crosbie Household energy consumption and consumer electronics: The case of television , 2008 .

[52]  Bert Bras,et al.  Energy implications of product leasing. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  Vicky Lofthouse,et al.  Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements , 2006 .

[54]  Edward Kavazanjian,et al.  Environmental, social, and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[55]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy and chemical use in the production chain for microchips , 2002, Conference Record 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.02CH37273).