The Attentional Cost of Amplitude and Directional Requirements When Pointing to Targets

The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative cost of accuracy constraints in direction or amplitude for movement regulation. The attentional cost is operationally defined as the amount of disturbance created in a secondary task by the simultaneous execution of a pointing task in direction or amplitude. The cost is expressed in terms of modifications in response to a secondary task, consisting of a foot-pedal release in response to an auditory stimulus (probe). The probe was introduced during the programming portion or the first, middle, or last portion of the pointing movement. The independent variables were the requirements of the task: direction or amplitude, and the moments of occurrence of the probe. Subjects were submitted to eight experimental conditions: (1) simple foot reaction time to a buzzer; (2) single directional task; (3) single amplitude task; (4) dual directional task (i.e. directional task with probe); (5) dual amplitude task (i.e. amplitude task with probe); (6) retest of foot simple reaction time; (7) retest of single directional task; and (8) retest of single amplitude task. Regulation in direction was more attention-demanding than regulation in distance in terms of programming. During pointing in amplitude, probe RT increased monotonically from start to end of movement execution, whereas directional pointing did not lead to any significant probe RT changes. These results emphasize the specific attentional loads for directional and amplitude pointing tasks, hence the involvement of different central nervous system mechanisms for the programming and regulation of the directional and amplitude parameters of pointing movements.

[1]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[3]  J. Ells.  Analysis of temporal and attentional aspects of movement control. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D J Glencross,et al.  The latency of aiming movements. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  The attention demands of movements. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[7]  D J Glencross,et al.  The planning of precision movements. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[9]  J. Paillard,et al.  15 The Multichanneling of Visual Cues and the Organization of A Visually Guided Response , 1980 .

[10]  P. McLeod.  36 What Can Probe Rt Tell Us About the Attentional Demands of Movement , 1980 .

[11]  D. Rosenbaum.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  L. Carlton.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Les G. Carlton,et al.  Visual Information: The Control of Aiming Movements , 1981 .

[14]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Control and Automatic Processing During Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance , 1981 .

[15]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[16]  Michel Bonnet,et al.  Specification of direction and extent in motor programming , 1982 .

[17]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  L Proteau,et al.  On the nature of the probe reaction-time task to uncover the attentional demands of movement. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Attentional strategies and the visual control of discrete movements. , 1984, Acta Psychologica.

[20]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  G A Frekany,et al.  Planning and preparing expected and unexpected movements: reexamining the relationships of arm, direction, and extent of movement. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  L. Hay,et al.  Visual Correction of a Rapid Goal-Directed Response , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Kalaska.  The representation of arm movements in postcentral and parietal cortex. , 1988, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[26]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three- dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Glencross,et al.  Some Experimental Evidence For and Against a Parametric Conception of Movement Programming , 1989 .

[28]  J. Tanji,et al.  Changing concepts of motor areas of the cerebral cortex , 1989, Brain and Development.

[29]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  A. Riehle,et al.  Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  C. Bard,et al.  Timing and accuracy of visually directed movements in children: control of direction and amplitude components. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  C. Bard,et al.  Positional versus directional control loops in visuomotor pointing , 1990 .

[34]  A. Georgopoulos.  Higher order motor control. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  C. Bard,et al.  On-line versus off-line control of rapid aiming movements. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  C. Bard,et al.  Directional control of rapid arm movements: the role of the kinetic visual feedback system. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.