Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?

We review the progress made in the field of object recognition over the past two decades. Structural-description models, making their appearance in the early 1980s, inspired a wealth of empirical research. Moving to the 1990s, psychophysical evidence for view-based accounts of recognition challenged some of the fundamental assumptions of structural-description theories. The 1990s also saw increased interest in the neurophysiological study of high-level visual cortex, the results of which provide some constraints on how objects may be represented. By 2000, neuroimaging arose as a viable means for connecting neurons to behavior. One of the most striking fMRI results has been category selectivity, which provided further constraints for models of object recognition. Despite this progress, the field is still faced with the challenge of developing a comprehensive theory that integrates this ever-increasing body of results and explains how we perceive and recognize objects.

[1]  D. Lowe.  Perceptual organization and visual recognition , 2012 .

[2]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.

[3]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Yaoda Xu.  Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Helen E. Fisher,et al.  Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[7]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Tarr,et al.  Are chess experts any different from face, bird, or Greeble experts? , 2004 .

[9]  N. Sigala,et al.  Visual categorization and the inferior temporal cortex , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[11]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  BOLD Activity during Mental Rotation and Viewpoint-Dependent Object Recognition , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  N. Sigala,et al.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex , 2002, Nature.

[14]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[15]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[16]  J. Tanaka.  The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  EFFECT OF IMAGE ORIENTATION AND SIZE ON OBJECT RECOGNITION: RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS IN THE MACAQUE MONKEY TEMPORAL CORTEX , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[23]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  E. Rolls,et al.  View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[26]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects , 1998, Cognition.

[27]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[29]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[33]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  D. Plaut.  Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[36]  M. Tarr.  Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  H. Rodman.  Development of inferior temporal cortex in the monkey. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  C. Gross,et al.  How inferior temporal cortex became a visual area. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  Object Recognition under Sequential Viewing Conditions: Evidence for Viewpoint-Specific Recognition Procedures , 1994, Perception.

[40]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[43]  M. Farah.  Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[44]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[45]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. , 1990, Science.

[48]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[49]  S. Ullman.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[50]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[52]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[53]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition: An introduction , 1984, Cognition.

[54]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[55]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  D. Marr.  Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 1983 .

[57]  J. Fodor.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[58]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[59]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  Malcolm D. Arnoult,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[61]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual Receptive Fields of Neurons in Inferotemporal Cortex of the Monkey , 1969, Science.

[62]  E. Warrington,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Facial Recognition in Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Lesions , 1967 .

[63]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[64]  H. Lissauer,et al.  Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrage zur Theorie derselben , 1890, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[65]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  RECONSIDERING THE ROLE OF STRUCTURE IN VISION , 2006 .

[66]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise Effects Are Not All or None: Spatially Limited Perceptual Expertise for Faces in a Case of Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Holistic Processing Develops Because it is Good , 2005 .

[69]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[70]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  O. G. Selfridge.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[72]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[73]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[74]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  J. Konorski.  Integrative activity of the brain : an interdisciplinary approach , 1967 .