Mechano-regulation of bone adaptation is controlled by the local in vivo environment and logarithmically dependent on loading frequency

It is well established that cyclic, but not static, mechanical loading has anabolic effects on bone. However, the function describing the relationship between the loading frequency and the amount of bone adaptation remains unclear. Using a combined experimental and computational approach, this study aimed to investigate whether bone mechano-regulation is controlled by mechanical signals in the local in vivo environment and dependent on loading frequency. Specifically, by combining in vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging with micro-finite element (micro-FE) analysis, we monitored the changes in microstructural as well as the mechanical in vivo environment (strain energy density (SED) and SED gradient) of mouse caudal vertebrae over 4 weeks of either cyclic loading at varying frequencies of 2Hz, 5Hz, or 10Hz, respectively or static loading. Higher values of SED and SED gradient on the local tissue level led to an increased probability of bone formation and a decreased probability of bone resorption. In all loading groups, the SED gradient was superior in the determination of local bone formation and resorption events as compared to SED. Cyclic loading induced positive net remodeling rates when compared to sham and static loading, mainly due to an increase in mineralizing surface and a decrease in eroded surface. Consequently, bone volume fraction increased over time in 2Hz, 5Hz and 10Hz (+15%, +21% and +24%, p<0.0001), while static loading led to a decrease in bone volume fraction (−9%, p≤0.001). Furthermore, regression analysis revealed a logarithmic relationship between loading frequency and the net change in bone volume fraction over the four week observation period (R2=0.74). In conclusion, these results suggest that bone adaptation is regulated by mechanical signals in the local in vivo environment and furthermore, that mechano-regulation is logarithmically dependent on loading frequency with frequencies below a certain threshold having catabolic effects, and those above anabolic effects. This study thereby provides valuable insights towards a better understanding of the mechanical signals influencing bone formation and resorption in the local in vivo environment.

[1]  Vee San Cheong,et al.  A novel algorithm to predict bone changes in the mouse tibia properties under physiological conditions , 2019, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[2]  Dharmendra Tripathi,et al.  In silico modeling of bone adaptation to rest-inserted loading: Strain energy density versus fluid flow as stimulus. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Navin Kumar,et al.  Establishing the relationship between loading parameters and bone adaptation. , 2018, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[5]  Mia M. Thi,et al.  Osteocyte calcium signals encode strain magnitude and loading frequency in vivo , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Sara Checa,et al.  Tomography-Based Quantification of Regional Differences in Cortical Bone Surface Remodeling and Mechano-Response , 2017, Calcified Tissue International.

[7]  André F. Pereira,et al.  Predicting cortical bone adaptation to axial loading in the mouse tibia , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Natacha Rosa,et al.  From mechanical stimulus to bone formation: A review. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Bone adaptation to cyclic loading in murine caudal vertebrae is maintained with age and directly correlated to the local micromechanical environment. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Strain energy density gradients in bone marrow predict osteoblast and osteoclast activity: a finite element study. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Joshua D Salvi,et al.  Control of a hair bundle’s mechanosensory function by its mechanical load , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Weinbaum,et al.  Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. , 2013, Bone.

[13]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Local Mechanical Stimuli Regulate Bone Formation and Resorption in Mice at the Tissue Level , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  I. Jasiuk,et al.  Modeling of cortical bone adaptation in a rat ulna: effect of frequency. , 2012, Bone.

[15]  R. Müller,et al.  Bone morphology allows estimation of loading history in a murine model of bone adaptation , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[16]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Mouse tail vertebrae adapt to cyclic mechanical loading by increasing bone formation rate and decreasing bone resorption rate as shown by time-lapsed in vivo imaging of dynamic bone morphometry. , 2011, Bone.

[17]  Yoshitaka Kameo,et al.  Effects of loading frequency on the functional adaptation of trabeculae predicted by bone remodeling simulation. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[18]  F. Jourdan,et al.  Numerical model of bone remodeling sensitive to loading frequency through a poroelastic behavior and internal fluid movements. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Yi Duan,et al.  An Integrative Review of Mechanotransduction in Endothelial, Epithelial (Renal) and Dendritic Cells (Osteocytes) , 2011, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[20]  Ralph Müller,et al.  In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. , 2011, Bone.

[21]  Ralph Müller,et al.  A novel in vivo mouse model for mechanically stimulated bone adaptation – a combined experimental and computational validation study , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  Yoshitaka Kameo,et al.  Transient response of fluid pressure in a poroelastic material under uniaxial cyclic loading , 2008 .

[23]  C. Turner,et al.  Frequency-dependent enhancement of bone formation in murine tibiae and femora with knee loading , 2007, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[24]  D. Corey,et al.  The micromachinery of mechanotransduction in hair cells. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  C. Turner,et al.  Mechanotransduction in the cortical bone is most efficient at loading frequencies of 5-10 Hz. , 2004, Bone.

[26]  N. Graham,et al.  Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: Statistical significance and interpretation , 2002 .

[27]  S. Cowin,et al.  A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  N Ohashi,et al.  Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. , 2001, Bone.

[29]  C. Turner,et al.  Effects of Loading Frequency on Mechanically Induced Bone Formation , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  R Huiskes,et al.  If bone is the answer, then what is the question? , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone , 2000, Nature.

[32]  C H Turner,et al.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. , 1998, Bone.

[33]  I. Owan,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[34]  M W Otter,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? , 1994, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  J. Hert,et al.  Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. 1. Continuous and intermittent loading of tibia in rabbit. , 1971, Folia morphologica.

[36]  Leo L. Beranek,et al.  Introduction and terminology , 2019, Acoustics: Sound Fields, Transducers and Vibration.

[37]  Ak Kapoor,et al.  Chapter-1.1 Introduction and Terminology , 2013 .

[38]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  Sheldon Weinbaum,et al.  Fluid and Solute Transport in Bone: Flow-Induced Mechanotransduction. , 2009, Annual review of fluid mechanics.

[40]  C T Rubin,et al.  Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  Subrata Saha,et al.  A theoretical model for stress-generated fluid flow in the canaliculi-lacunae network in bone tissue. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  J. Hert,et al.  Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli , 1972 .

[44]  Allan J. Zuckerwar,et al.  Acoustics: Sound Fields and Transducers , 1954 .