Intelligent Virtual Agents for Education and Training: Opportunities and Challenges

Interactive virtual worlds provide a powerful medium for experiential learning. Intelligent virtual agents can cohabit virtual worlds with people and facilitate such learning as guides, mentors, and teammates. This paper reviews the main pedagogical advantages of animated agents in virtual worlds, discusses two key research challenges, and outlines an ambitious new project addressing those challenge.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge , 1987 .

[2]  Judith D. Wilson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems , 1990 .

[3]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  J. Cassell,et al.  Conversation as a System Framework : Designing Embodied Conversational Agents , 1999 .

[5]  Jeff Rickel,et al.  Virtual Humans for Team Training in Virtual Reality , 1999 .

[6]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Pedagogical agents on the Web , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[8]  James C. Lester,et al.  Deictic Believability: Coordinated Gesture, Locomotion, and Speech in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[9]  Luke S. Zettlemoyer,et al.  Explanatory lifelike avatars: performing user-centered tasks in 3D learning environments , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[10]  James C. Lester,et al.  Lifelike Pedagogical Agents and Affective Computing: An Exploratory Synthesis , 1999, Artificial Intelligence Today.

[11]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Design of a Virtual Human Presenter , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Douglas B. Millar,et al.  Building a Case for Agent-Assisted Learning as a Catalyst for Curriculum Reform in Medical Education , 2000 .

[14]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  Émile: Marshalling passions in training and education , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[15]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational interface agents , 2000, CACM.

[16]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Interactive pedagogical drama , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[17]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[18]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[19]  Randall W. Hill,et al.  Toward the holodeck: integrating graphics, sound, character and story , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[20]  Randall W. Hill,et al.  Steve Goes to Bosnia: Towards a New Generation of Virtual Humans for Interactive Experiences , 2001 .

[21]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Today , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Human conversation as a system framework: designing embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[23]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Tears and fears: modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[24]  James C. Lester,et al.  Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents , 2001 .

[25]  S. Marsella,et al.  The Effect of Affect: Modeling the Impact of Emotional State on the Behavior of Interactive Virtual Humans , 2001 .

[26]  W. Johnson,et al.  Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds , 2001 .

[27]  David R. Traum,et al.  Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[28]  Randall W. Hill,et al.  Toward a New Generation of Virtual Humans for Interactive Experiences , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..