A comparison of elementary teachers' verbal supports for students in inclusive and general classroom contexts during an NGSS‐aligned science, engineering, and computer science unit

[1]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Characterizing pedagogical decision points in sense‐making conversations motivated by scientific uncertainty , 2022, Science Education.

[2]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Elementary teachers' verbal supports of science and engineering practices in an NGSS‐aligned science, engineering, and computational thinking unit , 2022, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[3]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Elementary Teachers’ Verbal Support of Engineering Integration in an Interdisciplinary Project , 2021, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER).

[4]  Angela M. Kelly,et al.  NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction , 2021 .

[5]  Lisa A. Borgerding,et al.  ‘Science is accessible for everyone’: preservice special education teachers’ nature of science perceptions and instructional practices , 2021 .

[6]  C. Schwarz,et al.  Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches , 2021 .

[7]  Miklós Maróti,et al.  Domain-Specific Modeling Languages in Computer-Based Learning Environments: a Systematic Approach to Support Science Learning through Computational Modeling , 2020, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[8]  Charlie A. Rupp,et al.  Mapping undergraduate chemistry students' epistemic ideas about models and modeling , 2020 .

[9]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of Research on STEM Education , 2020 .

[10]  Timothy J. Lewis,et al.  What Are High-Leverage Practices for Special Education Teachers and Why Are They Important? , 2019, Remedial and Special Education.

[11]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Teachers' framing of argumentation goals: Working together to develop individual versus communal understanding , 2019, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[12]  V. Prain,et al.  Rethinking Disciplinary Links in Interdisciplinary STEM Learning: a Temporal Model , 2019, Research in Science Education.

[13]  Edna Tan,et al.  Engineering for sustainable communities: Epistemic tools in support of equitable and consequential middle school engineering , 2019, Science Education.

[14]  Kathryn N. Hayes,et al.  Understanding teacher instructional change: the case of integrating NGSS and stewardship in professional development , 2019 .

[15]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards , 2018 .

[16]  L. Florian,et al.  Inclusive pedagogy in action: getting it right for every child , 2018 .

[17]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Vexing questions that sustain sensemaking , 2018, International Journal of Science Education.

[18]  Allyson Rogan-Klyve,et al.  Talking modelling: examining secondary science teachers’ modelling-related talk during a model-based inquiry unit , 2018, International Journal of Science Education.

[19]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Promoting elementary students’ epistemology of science through computer-supported knowledge-building discourse and epistemic reflection , 2018 .

[20]  Charles A. Hughes,et al.  Explicit Instruction and Next Generation Science Standards Aligned Classrooms: A Fit or a Split? , 2017 .

[21]  C. Cunningham,et al.  Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education. , 2017 .

[22]  K. Tank,et al.  Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge , 2017 .

[23]  Christina V. Schwarz,et al.  Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students , 2016 .

[24]  Aaron W. Johnson,et al.  Noticing, Assessing, and Responding to Students' Engineering: Exploring a Responsive Teaching Approach to Engineering Design , 2016 .

[25]  Yi Luo.  Design fixation and cooperative learning in elementary engineering design project: A case study , 2015 .

[26]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[27]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Engineering Design‐Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School , 2013 .

[28]  William J. Therrien,et al.  Science education for students with special needs , 2012 .

[29]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education , 2012 .

[30]  William J. Therrien,et al.  Science Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta–Analysis , 2011 .

[31]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Elementary Students’ Learning of Materials Science Practices Through Instruction Based on Engineering Design Tasks , 2010 .

[32]  Bryan G. Cook,et al.  Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education , 2009 .

[33]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Content Knowledge for Teaching , 2008 .

[34]  J. Remillard.  Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[35]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[36]  S. Barab,et al.  Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation , 2003 .

[37]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[38]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[39]  J. Remillard.  Curriculum Materials in Mathematics Education Reform: A Framework for Examining Teachers' Curriculum Development , 1999 .

[40]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[41]  R. Marks.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From a Mathematical Case to a Modified Conception , 1990 .

[42]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Redesign or relabel? How a commercial curriculum and its implementation oversimplify key features of the NGSS , 2020 .

[43]  Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia.  Integrating Asset-based Practices, Engineering, and NGSS: Lessons from Working with Teachers through a Community-focused Approach , 2020 .

[44]  Rosemary S. Russ.  Characterizing teacher attention to student thinking: A role for epistemological messages , 2018 .

[45]  Ali Jamshidi,et al.  The New NGSS Classroom: A Curriculum Framework for Project-Based Science Learning. , 2018 .

[46]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Approaches to Integrating Engineering in STEM Units and Student Achievement Gains , 2017 .

[47]  David Reynolds,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs and Behaviors: What Really Matters?. , 2015 .

[48]  J. Michael Shaughnessy,et al.  Mathematics in a STEM Context , 2013 .

[49]  T. Moore,et al.  Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration , 2012 .

[50]  Carla C. Johnson,et al.  What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships , 2012 .

[51]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .