A million answers to twenty questions : choosing by checklist

Several decision models in marketing science and psychology assume that a consumer chooses by proceeding sequentially through a checklist of desirable properties. These models are contrasted to the utility maximization model of rationality in economics. We show on the contrary that the two approaches are nearly equivalent. Since the number of preference discriminations that an agent can make increases exponentially in the number of properties used, checklists provide a rapid procedural basis for utility maximization.

[1]  W. Sierpinski Sur une propriété des ensembles ordonnés , 1949 .

[2]  Ely Dahan,et al.  Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference , 2007 .

[3]  J. Orlin,et al.  Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference , 2007 .

[4]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. , 2006, Psychological review.

[5]  B. Jones BOUNDED RATIONALITY , 1999 .

[7]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[8]  E. N. Gilbert Games of Identification or Convergence , 1962 .

[9]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Choice by Lexicographic Semiorders , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Yoella Bereby-Meyer,et al.  Children's Choice Strategies: The Effects of Age and Task Demands. , 2004 .

[11]  J. Eatwell,et al.  The New Palgrave : utility and probability , 1990 .

[12]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 3: Sorting and Searching , 1974 .

[13]  John S. Chipman,et al.  Preferences, Utility, and Demand. , 1972 .

[14]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The art of computer programming: sorting and searching (volume 3) , 1973 .

[15]  P. Fishburn Mathematics of decision theory , 1972 .

[16]  R. Tosic An optimal search procedure , 1980 .

[17]  P. J. Cohen,et al.  THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS, II. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  박상용 [경제학] 현시선호이론(Revealed Preference Theory) , 1980 .

[19]  K. Lancaster,et al.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[21]  P. J. Cohen,et al.  THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY , 1974 .

[23]  David A. Huffman,et al.  A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes , 1952, Proceedings of the IRE.

[24]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[25]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[26]  David Thomas,et al.  The Art in Computer Programming , 2001 .

[27]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy , 2006 .

[28]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  WHY ARE CERTAIN PROPERTIES OF BINARY RELATIONS RELATIVELY MORE COMMON IN NATURAL LANGUAGE , 1996 .

[29]  P. Cameron Naïve set theory , 1998 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  From substantive to procedural rationality , 1976 .

[31]  C. Luther,et al.  INDEPENDENCE OF THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS , 2009 .

[32]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 3: Sorting and Searching , 1998 .

[33]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Preference, Belief, and Similarity: Selected Writings , 2003 .

[35]  Nicolas Houy,et al.  Lexicographic compositions of multiple criteria for decision making , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[36]  L. Martignon,et al.  Use of simple heuristics to target macrolide prescription in children with community-acquired pneumonia. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[37]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Sequentially Rationalizable Choice , 2007 .

[38]  J. Chipman The Foundations of Utility , 1960 .

[39]  Yuval Salant,et al.  A model of choice from lists , 2006 .