Invariant properties between stroke features in handwriting.

A handwriting pattern is considered as a sequence of ballistic strokes. Replications of a pattern may be generated from a single, higher-level memory representation, acting as a motor program. Therefore, those stroke features which show the most invariant pattern are probably related to the parameters of the higher-level representation, whereas the more noisy features are probably related to the parameters derived at the lower levels (top-down hierarchy). This hierarchy of invariances can be revealed by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the between-parameter correlations, and the between-condition correlations. Similarly, at the higher level a sequence of strokes may act as a unit from which individual strokes are derived (sequence hierarchy). This hierarchy of invariances can be revealed by the between-stroke correlation, which forms a weaker criterion than rescalability, which has been rejected mostly. Previous research showed that vertical stroke size has higher SNRs and higher between-condition correlations than stroke duration or peak force, whereas the latter two features were also negatively correlated. This suggested that vertical stroke size is a higher-level parameter than the other two. The present research largely confirmed this top-down hierarchy and even for upstrokes and downstrokes separately. Downstrokes were more invariant than upstrokes in terms of vertical stroke size. However, contrary to the vertical stroke size, the horizontal stroke size was not invariant. Both vertical and horizontal sizes showed substantial between-stroke correlations. In contrast, the stroke durations did not show any between-stroke correlations. This suggests that stroke segmentation is reliable in spite of the discrete sampling of the handwriting movements.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  F. J. Maarse,et al.  Produced and perceived writing slant: difference between up and down strokes. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[3]  J. P. Wann,et al.  Space-time invariance in handwriting: Contrasts between primary school children displaying advanced or retarded handwriting acquisition☆ , 1986 .

[4]  J. Wann,et al.  Evidence against the Relative Invariance of Timing in Handwriting , 1990 .

[5]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The 1984 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: The Search for Invariance in Skilled Movement Behavior , 1985 .

[6]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  A DESCRIPTION OF HANDWRITING IN TERMS OF MAIN AXES , 1989 .

[7]  Lambertus Schomaker.  Un-supervised learning of prototype allographs in cursive script recognition using invariant handwriting features , 1991 .

[8]  M. Smyth,et al.  Functions of vision in the control of handwriting , 1987 .

[9]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. , 1988 .

[10]  H. Heuer.  Adjustment and readjustment of the relative timing of a motor pattern , 1988, Psychological research.

[11]  D J Povel,et al.  Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[12]  H. Pick,et al.  Geometric transformations of handwriting as a function of instruction and feedback. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[13]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Kinematics properties of rapid aimed hand movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  F. Lacquaniti.  Central representations of human limb movement as revealed by studies of drawing and handwriting , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  The timing of interresponse intervals , 1973 .

[16]  Hans-Leo Teulings.  A Handwriting Recognition System Based on Properties of the Human Motor System , 1990 .

[17]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[18]  E. H. Dooijes.  Analysis of handwriting movements , 1983 .

[19]  A. Gordon,et al.  Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. , 1984 .

[20]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  Constancy in stationary and progressive handwriting , 1983 .

[21]  R. Marteniuk,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic changes that occur as a function of learning a time-constrained aiming task. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Invariants in Handwriting: The Information Contained in a Motor Program , 1986 .

[23]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  The consistency of cursive letter formation as a function of position in the word , 1983 .

[24]  A. Wing,et al.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[26]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[27]  Lambert Schomaker,et al.  Between-letter context effects in handwriting trajectories , 1986 .

[28]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Evidence for generalized motor programs using gait pattern analysis. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  S W Keele,et al.  Force control and its relation to timing. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  H. Heuer.  On re-scaleability of force and time in aiming movements , 1984 .

[31]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  Hierarchical Control in the Execution of Action Sequences: Tests of Two Invariance Properties , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[32]  Emilie Stockholm.  Recognition of a Writer as a Function of His Method of Writing , 1979 .

[33]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[34]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting , 1983 .

[35]  LAMBERT R. B. SCHOMAKER,et al.  A computational model of cursive handwriting , 1987 .

[36]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE PRODUCTION OF CONNECTING STROKES IN CURSIVE WRITING: DEVELOPING CO-ARTICULATION IN 8 TO 12 YEAR-OLD CHILDREN , 1989 .

[37]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory ☆ , 1991 .

[39]  R B Ivry,et al.  Force and timing components of the motor program. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  P. Viviani,et al.  32 Space-Time Invariance in Learned Motor Skills , 1980 .

[41]  H Heuer,et al.  Testing the invariance of relative timing: comment on Gentner (1987). , 1988, Psychological review.

[42]  K. Newell,et al.  The relationship of impulse to response timing error. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  A. Wing.  Response Timing in Handwriting , 1978 .

[44]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The influence of task and organismic constraints on intralimb and pen-point kinematics in a drawing task , 1990 .

[45]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting , 1983 .

[46]  Lambertus Schomaker,et al.  Stroke- versus Character-based Recognition of On-line, Connected Cursive Script , 1991 .

[47]  D. Gentner.  Timing of Skilled Motor Performance: Tests of the Proportional Duration Model. , 1987 .

[48]  S. Keele,et al.  The Structure of Motor Programs , 1976 .

[49]  A. Semjen,et al.  Determinants of Timing in Serial Movements , 1992 .

[50]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[51]  A. Thomassen,et al.  Time, Size and Shape in Handwriting: Exploring Spatio-temporal Relationships at Different Levels , 1985 .

[52]  G. V. Galen,et al.  Allographic variability in adult handwriting , 1991 .