Exploring the Relative Importance of Normative and Distinctive Organizational Preferences as Predictors of Work Attitudes

Profile approaches to operationalizing person-organization (P-O) fit as the within-person correlation between an individual’s ideal organization characteristics and their actual organization characteristics regularly find strong associations between P-O fit and an individual’s work attitudes. However, profile correlation indices and other overall indices of P-O fit regularly confound normative and distinctive components of fit—that is: the extent to which the person’s organization culture fits the culture that would be preferred by the average person, and the extent to which their organization fits an individual’s idiosyncratic preferences. Here, we show how these two normative and distinctive P-O fits can be differentiated and related to an individual’s attitudes about their organization experience. Utilizing data from 723 participants from four samples, we show that the degree to which an individual’s description of their organizational culture corresponds to the normative ideal organizational culture may account for nearly all of the large associations regularly found between overall P-O fit indices and positive workplace attitudes. In contrast, the degree of fit between an individual’s work environment and their distinctive or idiosyncratic preferences may play a relatively small role in predicting the positive workplace attitudes. We discuss broader implications for the design of organizational cultures and the more general understanding of the nature of P-O fit.

[1]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Methodology: Theoretical Non-Linearity, Tutorial and Applications for Information Systems Research , 2019, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Gary Kline Foreword , 2019, Journal of Global South Studies.

[3]  M. Back,et al.  Response Surface Analysis in Personality and Social Psychology: Checklist and Clarifications for the Case of Congruence Hypotheses , 2019 .

[4]  A. V. Vianen Person–Environment Fit: A Review of Its Basic Tenets , 2018 .

[5]  D. Wood,et al.  Assessment of similarity and self-other agreement in dyadic relationships , 2018 .

[6]  T. Yarkoni,et al.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Melissa G. Keith,et al.  Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations , 2017, Frontiers in Psychology.

[8]  M. Donnellan,et al.  A simulator of the degree to which random responding leads to biases in the correlations between two individual differences , 2017 .

[9]  P. Harms,et al.  Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples , 2017 .

[10]  S. Côté,et al.  How to Test Questions About Similarity in Personality and Social Psychology Research , 2017 .

[11]  D. Wood,et al.  The Correlates of Similarity Estimates Are Often Misleadingly Positive , 2016, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  B. Hesketh,et al.  Person–Environment Fit , 2015 .

[13]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Knowing versus liking: Separating normative knowledge from social desirability in first impressions of personality. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Jason L. Huang,et al.  Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Mehmet Eryilmaz,et al.  A study of the relationship between person-organization fit and employee creativity , 2014 .

[16]  P. Harms,et al.  The relations between actual similarity and experienced similarity , 2014 .

[17]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Fit Happens Globally: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of the Relationships of Person–Environment Fit Dimensions with Work Attitudes and Performance Across East Asia, Europe, and North America , 2014 .

[18]  D. Wood,et al.  On the similarity between exchangeable profiles: A psychometric model, analytic strategy, and empirical illustration. , 2013, Journal of research in personality.

[19]  W. Hale,et al.  Longitudinal associations between personality profile stability and adjustment in college students: distinguishing among overall stability, distinctive stability, and within-time normativeness. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[20]  D. Wood,et al.  Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  J. Edwards,et al.  The value of value congruence. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  J. Diefendorff,et al.  Different fits satisfy different needs: linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Edward L. Levine,et al.  Person–environment fit or person plus environment: A meta-analysis of studies using polynomial regression analysis , 2008 .

[24]  R. Furr A framework for profile similarity: integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. , 2008, Journal of personality.

[25]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[26]  Donald E. Brown HUMAN UNIVERSALS , 2008, Science.

[27]  P. Lara Should faith and hope be included in the employees' agenda? , 2008 .

[28]  D. Annis Dyadic Data Analysis , 2007 .

[29]  Kelly A. Piasentin,et al.  Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement , 2006 .

[30]  M. Seligman,et al.  Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states , 2006 .

[31]  Lisa Schurer Lambert,et al.  The phenomenology of fit: linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Dennis Doverspike,et al.  The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: an assessment of its criterion-related validity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Berrin Erdogan,et al.  Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture , 2006 .

[34]  Walter D. Davis,et al.  Journal of Management High-performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: the Mediating Role of Internal on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association , 2005 .

[35]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[36]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Managing Multiple Roles: Work-Family Policies and Individuals' Desires for Segmentation , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[37]  David F. Caldwell,et al.  Firm or subgroup culture: where does fitting in matter most? , 2004 .

[38]  Linda A. Cyr,et al.  An Integrative Analysis of Person-Organization Fit Theories , 2004 .

[39]  D. Funder,et al.  Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches ☆ , 2004 .

[40]  J. Edwards,et al.  Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Berrin Erdogan,et al.  WORK VALUE CONGRUENCE AND INTRINSIC CAREER SUCCESS: THE COMPENSATORY ROLES OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT , 2004 .

[42]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes , 2003 .

[43]  D. S. Derue,et al.  The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Brian R. Dineen,et al.  A Web of applicant attraction: person-organization fit in the context of Web-based recruitment. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  A. Bartlett,et al.  The hospitality industry culture profile: a measure of individual values, organizational culture, and person–organization fit as predictors of job satisfaction and behavioral intentions , 2002 .

[46]  J. Edwards Ten Difference Score Myths , 2001 .

[47]  J. Guthrie High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[48]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[49]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Strategic Human Resource Management: The Value of Different Paradigms , 1999 .

[50]  C. Vandenberghe Organizational culture, person–culture fit, and turnover: a replication in the health care industry , 1999 .

[51]  T. Judge,et al.  Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  APPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION , 1997 .

[53]  N. Schmitt Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. , 1996 .

[54]  K. Gallagher Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life , 1996 .

[55]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry☆ , 1996 .

[56]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[57]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[58]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[59]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  The ASA framework: An update. , 1995 .

[60]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Cheryl L. Adkins,et al.  JUDGMENTS OF FIT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS: THE ROLE OF WORK VALUE CONGRUENCE , 1994 .

[62]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different can You Be? , 1994 .

[63]  J. Edwards The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[64]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[65]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. , 1993 .

[66]  E. Morrison,et al.  Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization , 1993 .

[67]  J. E. Sheridan Organizational Culture and Employee Retention , 1992 .

[68]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions , 1992 .

[69]  L. H. Lofquist,et al.  Essentials of Person-Environment-Correspondence Counseling , 1991 .

[70]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[71]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process , 1990 .

[72]  Jennifer A. Chatman Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms , 1989 .

[73]  Jennifer A. Chatman Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit , 1989 .

[74]  R. Dawis,et al.  Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment☆ , 1987 .

[75]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[76]  J. French,et al.  The mechanisms of job stress and strain , 1984 .

[77]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  J. Cohen gamma c: a profile similarity coefficient invariant over variable reflection. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[80]  R. W. White Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[81]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[82]  R. Cattell The three basic factor-analytic research designs-their interrelations and derivatives. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  Louis Guttman,et al.  A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability , 1945, Psychometrika.

[84]  E. G. Williamson On Choosing a Vocation , 1936 .

[85]  P. Harms,et al.  How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. , 2015, Psychological review.

[86]  R. Dawis,et al.  The Minnesota Theory of Work Adjustment. , 2005 .

[87]  B. Schneider,et al.  P–E fit and the attraction-selection-attrition model of organizational functioning: Introduction and overview. , 2001 .

[88]  Harold W. Goldstein,et al.  Attraction–selection–attrition: Toward a person–environment psychology of organizations. , 2000 .

[89]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP , 1999 .

[90]  Neil B. Niman,et al.  Natural images in economic thought: The role of biological analogies in the theory of the firm , 1994 .

[91]  P. Hanges,et al.  A network model of organizational climate: Friendship clusters, subgroup agreement, and climate schemas , 2008 .

[92]  L. Zucker Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[93]  R. Dawis,et al.  A psychological theory of work adjustment : an individual-differences model and its applications , 1984 .

[94]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[95]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[96]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .