Mitigating the Perception of Threat to Freedom through Abstraction and Distance

This study tested theoretical relationships between key concepts in psychological reactance theory and construal level theory. Through a 3 × 2 × 2 experiment (n = 155), we manipulate (1) how abstractly or concretely participants are processing a message, (2) the psychological distance to the message, and (3) whether or not the message restricts choice. Dependent measures include perceptions of threat to freedom and message effectiveness. Results show that increasing abstraction and/or distance can mitigate the perception of threat to freedom that is experienced when a message restricts choice. Furthermore, this process has a subsequent influence on message effectiveness. As the first study to consider the perception of threat to freedom in the context of construal level theory, this experiment furthers understanding of key theoretical relationships. Strategies for the design of successful persuasive messages are discussed.

[1]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom , 2007 .

[2]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Test and Extension of the Intertwined Model , 2007 .

[3]  C. Insko,et al.  Chapter 7 – RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION , 1972 .

[4]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach , 2003, Health communication.

[5]  J. Kees Temporal Framing in Health Advertising: The Role of Risk and Future Orientation , 2010 .

[6]  Cheryl J Wakslak The experience of cognitive dissonance in important and trivial domains: A Construal-Level Theory approach , 2012 .

[7]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Biases in Assessments of Environmental Conditions in New Zealand , 2011 .

[8]  Elena Bessarabova,et al.  Reactance, Restoration, and Cognitive Structure: Comparative Statics , 2013 .

[9]  D. Boninger,et al.  The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. , 1994 .

[10]  Lijiang Shen The Effectiveness of Empathy- Versus Fear-Arousing Antismoking PSAs , 2011, Health communication.

[11]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. , 2014, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[12]  Hsuan-Yi Chou,et al.  The effects of incentive types and appeal regulatory framing in travel advertising , 2012 .

[13]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[14]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion , 2006 .

[15]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  R. Dhar,et al.  Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice , 2007 .

[17]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[18]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[19]  Sahara Byrne,et al.  The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework , 2009 .

[20]  Marlone D. Henderson,et al.  There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  Moving Beyond Deliberative Control of Impulses , 2009, Psychological science.

[22]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[23]  Michael Burgoon,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Language Intensity in Preventive Messages on Planned Family Solar Protection , 2000, Health communication.

[24]  K. Fujita,et al.  Influencing Attitudes Toward Near and Distant Objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[25]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[26]  Marco Yzer,et al.  Construal Level Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior: Time Frame Effects on Salient Belief Generation , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[27]  Lyndall G. Steed,et al.  Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psychological reactance in smokers , 2011 .

[28]  Brian L Quick,et al.  The Use of Gain- or Loss-Frame Messages and Efficacy Appeals to Dissuade Excessive Alcohol Consumption Among College Students: A Test of Psychological Reactance Theory , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[29]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics (5th Edition) , 2006 .

[30]  Brian L. Quick,et al.  Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can Be Modeled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions , 2007, Commun. Res..

[31]  K. White,et al.  It's the Mind-Set that Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors , 2011 .

[32]  K. Fujita,et al.  Transcending Temptation Through Abstraction , 2012 .

[33]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Sensation Seeking and Psychological Reactance as Health Risk Predictors for an Emerging Adult Population , 2010, Health communication.

[34]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  J. Dillard,et al.  On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication , 2005 .

[36]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment: A Construal Level Perspective , 2007 .

[37]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction ☆ , 2010 .

[38]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[39]  Jeff Joireman,et al.  Understanding behavior in the context of time : theory, research, and application , 2005 .

[40]  Lijiang Shen,et al.  Mitigating Psychological Reactance: The Role of Message‐Induced Empathy in Persuasion , 2010 .

[41]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  thE EffEcts of constrUal lEvEls on asymmEtric tEmPtation-goal cognitivE associations , 2011 .

[42]  Brian L Quick,et al.  Examining the Use of Forceful Language When Designing Exercise Persuasive Messages for Adults: A Test of Conceptualizing Reactance Arousal as a Two-Step Process , 2008, Health communication.

[43]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[44]  Sherri Jean Katz,et al.  Construal Level Theory of Mobile Persuasion , 2013 .

[45]  C. T. Salmon,et al.  Unintended Effects of Health Communication Campaigns , 2007 .

[46]  Emily Moyer-Gusé Toward a Theory of Entertainment Persuasion: Explaining the Persuasive Effects of Entertainment‐Education Messages , 2008 .

[47]  Anca M. Miron,et al.  Reactance Theory - 40 Years Later , 2006 .

[48]  Brian L. Quick,et al.  Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration , 2008 .

[49]  R. A. Wicklund Freedom and reactance , 1974 .

[50]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  It's Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion , 2009 .

[51]  J. Brehm A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .