Three dimensional echo-planar imaging at 7 Tesla

Functional MRI (fMRI) most commonly employs 2D echo-planar imaging (EPI). The advantages for fMRI brought about by the increasingly popular ultra-high field strengths are best exploited in high-resolution acquisitions, but here 2D EPI becomes impractical for several reasons, including the very long volume acquisitions times. In this study at 7 T, a 3D EPI sequence with full parallel and partial Fourier imaging capability along both phase encoding axes was implemented and used to evaluate the sensitivity of 3D and corresponding 2D EPI acquisitions at four different spatial resolutions ranging from small to typical voxel sizes (1.5-3.0 mm isotropic). Whole-brain resting state measurements (N=4) revealed a better, or at least comparable sensitivity of the 3D method for gray and white matter. The larger vulnerability of 3D to physiological effects was outweighed by the much shorter volume TR, which moreover allows whole-brain coverage at high resolution within fully acceptable limits for event-related fMRI: TR was only 3.07 s for 1.5 mm, 1.88 s for 2.0 mm, 1.38 s for 2.5 mm and 1.07 s for 3.0 mm isotropic resolution. In order to investigate the ability to detect and spatially resolve BOLD activation in the visual cortex, functional 3D EPI experiments (N=8) were performed at 1 mm isotropic resolution with parallel imaging acceleration of 3x3, resulting in a TR of only 3.2 s for whole-brain coverage. From our results, and several other practical advantages of 3D over 2D EPI found in the present study, we conclude that 3D EPI provides a useful alternative for whole-brain fMRI at 7 T, not only when high-resolution data are required.

[1]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Accelerated parallel imaging for functional imaging of the human brain , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  Tobias Kober,et al.  Comparison Of Single-Shot 2d EPI And Segmented 3d EVI Acquisition For fMRI at 7T , 2009 .

[3]  M. Zaitsev,et al.  High resolution single-shot EPI at 7T , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[4]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[5]  D. Norris,et al.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel‐acquired inhomogeneity‐desensitized fMRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D. Norris.  Principles of magnetic resonance assessment of brain function , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Application of sensitivity‐encoded echo‐planar imaging for blood oxygen level‐dependent functional brain imaging † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Sensitivity-encoded (SENSE) echo planar fMRI at 3T in the medial temporal lobe , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Yanle Hu,et al.  Three‐dimensional spiral technique for high‐resolution functional MRI , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Effect of spatial smoothing on physiological noise in high-resolution fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Bixente Dilharreguy,et al.  A PRESTO‐SENSE sequence with alternating partial‐Fourier encoding for rapid susceptibility‐weighted 3D MRI time series , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  A 32 Channel Receive-only Head Coil And Detunable Transmit Birdcage Coil For 7 Tesla Brain Imaging , 2006 .

[14]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Christine Preibisch,et al.  Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI) , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  A. Song,et al.  Echo‐volume imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  P. Mansfield,et al.  Echo‐Volumar Imaging (EVI) of the Brain at 3.0 T: First Normal Volunteer and Functional Imaging Results , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  G H Glover,et al.  Three‐dimensional spiral fMRI technique: A comparison with 2D spiral acquisition , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Benedikt A. Poser,et al.  Investigating the benefits of multi-echo EPI for fMRI at 7 T , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Single‐shot half k‐space high‐resolution gradient‐recalled EPI for fMRI at 3 tesla , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  X Golay,et al.  PRESTO‐SENSE: An ultrafast whole‐brain fMRI technique , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Erno J. Hermans,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity with fast three‐dimensional blood‐oxygen‐level‐dependent functional MRI: comparison of SENSE–PRESTO and 2D‐EPI at 3 T , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  J. Duyn,et al.  A. functional MRI technique combining principles of echo‐shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO) , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.