The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Premkumar Elangovan | Kevin Wells | Alistair Mackenzie | Andria Hadjipanteli | David R Dance | Padraig T Looney | Kenneth C Young | D. Dance | K. Young | K. Wells | P. Looney | Alistair Mackenzie | P. Elangovan | A. Hadjipanteli
[1] J. S. Laughlin,et al. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.
[2] Dev P Chakraborty,et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[3] H Bosmans,et al. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.
[4] D. DeLong,et al. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance. , 2007, Radiology.
[5] I. Sechopoulos. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.
[6] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[7] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Characterisation of Screen Detected and Simulated Calcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms , 2014, Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[8] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system. , 2012, Medical physics.
[9] Anders Tingberg,et al. Monte Carlo simulation of breast tomosynthesis: visibility of microcalcifications at different acquisition schemes , 2015, Medical Imaging.
[10] Bo Zhao,et al. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.
[11] Anders Tingberg,et al. Detection of calcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis slices at different dose levels utilizing a SRSAR reconstruction and JAFROC , 2015, Medical Imaging.
[12] D R Dance,et al. Comparison of the x-ray attenuation properties of breast calcifications, aluminium, hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[13] Stephen J. Glick,et al. Rapid Generation of Structured Physical Phantoms for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[14] K Bliznakova,et al. A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.
[15] James A. Scott. Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues ICRU Report 46. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1992, $40.00 , 1993 .
[16] H. Bosmans,et al. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.
[17] Michael P. Kempston,et al. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.
[18] David Gur,et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[19] R M Nishikawa,et al. Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.
[20] D R Dance,et al. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.
[21] I. Sechopoulos. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.
[22] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Characterisation of a breast tomosynthesis unit to simulate images , 2013, Medical Imaging.
[23] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Automated and Human Determination of Threshold Contrast for Digital Mammography Systems , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[24] Sara Gavenonis,et al. Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2011, The breast journal.
[25] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.
[26] Michael Sandborg,et al. Implementation of pathologies in the Monte Carlo model in chest and breast imaging , 2003 .
[27] M Ruschin,et al. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study. , 2012, Medical physics.
[28] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[29] Christian G. Graff,et al. A new, open-source, multi-modality digital breast phantom , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[30] D. Dance,et al. Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.
[31] E. Halpern,et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.
[32] Heang-Ping Chan,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views. , 2014, Radiology.
[33] Kenneth C. Young,et al. OPTIMAM Image Simulation Toolbox - Recent Developments and Ongoing Studies , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[34] C. J. Kotre,et al. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.
[35] Oliver Diaz,et al. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities. , 2014, Medical physics.
[36] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Generation of 3D synthetic breast tissue , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[37] A E Burgess,et al. The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[38] Otto Zhou,et al. Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system. , 2013, Medical physics.
[39] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Investigation of the effect of tube motion in breast tomosynthesis: continuous or step and shoot? , 2011, Medical Imaging.
[40] R. Siddon. Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.
[41] Ann-Katherine Carton,et al. A Novel 3D Stochastic Solid Breast Texture Model for X-Ray Breast Imaging , 2016, Digital Mammography / IWDM.
[42] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study , 2015, Medical Imaging.
[43] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.
[44] T. R. Fewell,et al. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.
[45] Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.
[46] A. Burgess. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.