Qualitative Heterogeneous Control of Higher Order Systems

This paper presents the qualitative heterogeneous control framework, a methodology for the design of a controlled hybrid system based on attractors and transitions between them. This framework designs a robust controller that can accommodate bounded amounts of parametric and structural uncertainty. This framework provides a number of advantages over other similar techniques. The local models used in the design process are qualitative, allowing the use of partial knowledge about system structure, and nonlinear, allowing regions and transitions to be defined in terms of dynamical attractors. In addition, we define boundaries between local models in a natural manner, appealing to intrinsic properties of the system. We demonstrate the use of this framework by designing a novel control algorithm for the cart-pole system. In addition, we illustrate how traditional algorithms, such as linear quadratic regulators, can be incorporated within this framework. The design is validated by experiments with a physical system.

[1]  E. Bradley AUTONOMOUS EXPLORATION AND CONTROL OF CHAOTIC SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[2]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[3]  D. W. Jordan,et al.  Nonlinear ordinary differential equations : an introduction to dynamical systems , 1999 .

[4]  Bernard Friedland,et al.  Advanced Control System Design , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Toward the control of a multi-jointed, monoped runner , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[6]  Chung Choo Chung,et al.  Nonlinear control of a swinging pendulum , 1995, Autom..

[7]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Sequential Composition of Dynamically Dexterous Robot Behaviors , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  The control of chaos: theory and applications , 2000 .

[9]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  On Contraction Analysis for Nonlinear Systems Analyzing stability differentially leads to a new perspective on nonlinear dynamic systems , 1999 .

[10]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Phase Regulation of Decentralized Cyclic Robotic Systems , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Intuitive control of a planar bipedal walking robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[12]  Edward Ott,et al.  Controlling chaos , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[13]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Qualitative Modeling and Heterogeneous Control of Global System Behavior , 2002, HSCC.

[14]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  The composition and validation of heterogeneous control laws , 1994, Autom..

[15]  Ying-Cheng Lai,et al.  Controlling chaos , 1994 .

[16]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[17]  William S. Levine,et al.  The Control Handbook , 2005 .

[18]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Hybrid control for global stabilization of the cart-pendulum system , 2001, Autom..

[20]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  On Contraction Analysis for Non-linear Systems , 1998, Autom..

[21]  H. Benjamin Brown,et al.  Evidence for Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum Running in a Hexapod Robot , 2000, ISER.

[22]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Swinging up a pendulum by energy control , 1996, Autom..