The effect of EDI on market channel relationships in retailing

Abstract Many of the economic advantages of using Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) result from improved relationships between business trading partners. This study develops and tests a model explaining the effects of EDI on three structural variables of inter-organizational relationships: channel intensity, formalization and information quality. The model also includes the effects of these structural variables on cooperation and conflict between trading partners, and on satisfaction and performance in a marketing channel. The model is based on Van de Ven and Ferry's theory of inter-organizational relations and the literature on marketing channels. Responses from 97 retail companies to a mail survey indicated support for the effects of EDI use on channel intensity and formalization but not on channel information quality. Moreover, intensity and formalization were positively related to channel cooperation but not to conflict. Channel performance was positively related to channel cooperation and negatively related to channel conflict. These findings suggest that EDI use improves cooperation between trading partners and leads to greater satisfaction and performance in electronically-mediated business transactions.

[1]  Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.  A model of EDI integration and strategic business reengineering , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Bernard J. La Londe,et al.  Electronic Purchase Order Interchange , 1985 .

[3]  Steve Scala,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of electronic data interchange an industry perspective , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective , 1990 .

[5]  Robert J. Thierauf,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange in Finance and Accounting , 1990 .

[6]  Gary L. Frazier,et al.  The Use of Influence Strategies in Interfirm Relationships in Industrial Product Channels , 1991 .

[7]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[8]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[9]  L. Stern,et al.  Distribution Channels as Political Economies: A Framework for Comparative Analysis , 1980 .

[10]  Éric Clémens,et al.  Telecom: hook up or lose out , 1986 .

[11]  R. O'Callaghan,et al.  Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Interchange Systems in Marketing Channels , 1992 .

[12]  Johannes Meier,et al.  A formal analysis of costs and benefits of interorganizational systems , 1990 .

[13]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[14]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Airline Reservations Systems: Lessons from History , 1988, MIS Q..

[15]  Blake Ives,et al.  The information system as a competitive weapon , 1984, CACM.

[16]  J. L. Gattorna,et al.  Channels of Distribution Conceptualisation: A State‐of‐the Art Review , 1978 .

[17]  Sarma R. Nidumolu.  Interorganizational information systems and the structure and climate of seller-buyer relationships , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.  Integrating Ed1 Into The Organization's Systems: A Model Of The Stages Of Integration , 1991, ICIS.

[19]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[20]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  SIM Paper Competition: Competing Through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the Single European Market , 1994, MIS Q..

[21]  Snehamay Banerjee,et al.  Electronic data interchange: Characteristics of users and nonusers , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Electronic Integration and Business Network Redesign: a Roles-Linkage Perspective , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Electronic Integration and Strategic Advantage: A Quasi-Experimental Study in the Insurance Industry , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels , 1987 .

[25]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[28]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Inter-organization networks, computer integration, and shifts in interdependence: the case of the semiconductor industry , 1991, TOIS.

[29]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[30]  John R. Nevin,et al.  The Differential Effects of Exercised and Unexercised Power Sources in a Marketing Channel , 1985 .

[31]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[32]  E. Clemons,et al.  McKesson drug company-a case study of Economost: a strategic information system , 1988, Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1988. Vol.IV. Applications Track.

[33]  M. A. Emmelhainz.  Electronic data interchange: A total management guide , 1990 .

[34]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Reaping EDI benefits through a pro-active approach , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[36]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels , 1987 .

[37]  J. K. Benson.  The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy , 1975 .

[38]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[39]  G. Walker,et al.  The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.