Fischer-Tropsch route for the conversion of biomass to liquid fuels - Technical and economic analysis

The techno-economics of biomass gasification systems for the production of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) based liquid fuels are analysed by estimating the overall mass and energy conversion of biomass to liquid (BTL) fuel. The investigation of BTL systems for 1000 kg/h biomass gasification system and an expected liquid hydrocarbon output of 1500 tonnes are estimated. The cost analysis, based on the annualized life cycle of the systems, includes a steam-oxygen based biomass gasification plant paired with the FT unit. The gasifier considered in this analysis is the downdraft reactor design, operating on oxygen-steam gasifying medium at an equivalence ratio of 0.1 and a steam-to-biomass ratio in the range of 0.8-1.2 to generate syngas with H-2/CO ratio of 2.1:1, ideally suitable for the cobalt based fixed bed FT reactor. The mass and energy balance reveal that for a once-through FT reactor configuration, substantial energy exists in the gas phase, which includes C1-05 hydrocarbons and unconverted syngas. The study suggests that the product gas be utilized in an IC engine and converted to electricity, for in-house power demands and for the sale of excess electricity to the grid. The analysis indicates a market competitive liquid fuel production with CO conversion greater than 60%, at a cost ranging from INR 35-40/litre (0.5-0.6 USD/litre) alongside electricity as a major co-product in the BTL system. This study examines the economics of building economically affordable and environmentally favourable BTL systems of smaller throughputs with particular reference to India. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Guillaume Boissonnet,et al.  Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels - A literature survey , 2014 .

[2]  A. Dalai,et al.  Pathways of lignocellulosic biomass conversion to renewable fuels , 2014 .

[3]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[4]  A. Jess,et al.  Influence of Particle Size and Single‐Tube Diameter on Thermal Behavior of Fischer‐Tropsch Reactors. Part I. Particle Size Variation for Constant Tube Size and Vice Versa , 2012 .

[5]  Amornchai Arpornwichanop,et al.  Techno-environmental analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch integrated process for the co-production of bio-fuel and power , 2016 .

[6]  H. S. Mukunda,et al.  Development of producer gas engines , 2005 .

[7]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermochemical production of liquid fuels from biomass: Thermo-economic modeling, process design and process integration analysis , 2010 .

[8]  A. Dalai,et al.  An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining , 2015 .

[9]  Heidi Ledford.  Liquid fuel synthesis: Making it up as you go along , 2006, Nature.

[10]  B. Joseph,et al.  Thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process: Bench-scale experimental results and projected process economics of a commercial scale process , 2013 .

[11]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  The effect of CO2 on a cobalt-based catalyst for low temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2012 .

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[13]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Investigations into enhanced wax production with combustion synthesized Fischer-Tropsch catalysts , 2016 .

[14]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways , 2010 .

[15]  Fuat E. Celik,et al.  Large‐scale gasification‐based coproduction of fuels and electricity from switchgrass , 2009 .

[16]  S. Mahapatra,et al.  Evaluation of various energy devices for domestic lighting in India: Technology, economics and CO2 emissions , 2009 .

[17]  H. S. Mukunda,et al.  Five-kilowatt wood gasifier technology: Evolution and field experience , 1989 .

[18]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources , 2011 .

[19]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis – Technology review and current scenario , 2016 .

[20]  P. Paul,et al.  Biomass derived producer gas as a reciprocating engine fuel—an experimental analysis , 2001 .

[21]  H. S. Mukunda,et al.  Gasifier-based power generation: Technology and economics , 1993 .

[22]  Karl O. Albrecht,et al.  Integrated process for the catalytic conversion of biomass-derived syngas into transportation fuels , 2016 .

[23]  S. Mahapatra,et al.  Gasification of wood particles in a co-current packed bed: Experiments and model analysis , 2016 .

[24]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: a review. , 2016 .

[25]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Oxy–steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen rich syngas production using downdraft reactor configuration , 2014 .

[26]  Ryan Michael Swanson.  Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification☆ , 2010 .

[27]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Rural electrification: Optimising the choice between decentralised renewable energy sources and grid extension , 2012 .

[28]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[29]  Theodoros Damartzis,et al.  Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design—A review , 2011 .

[30]  Ulrich Kunz,et al.  Reactors for Fischer‐Tropsch Synthesis , 2008 .

[31]  Sajal Ghosh,et al.  Import demand of crude oil and economic growth: Evidence from India , 2009 .

[32]  Arno de Klerk,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch Refining , 2011 .