Rigorous results, cross-model justification, and the transfer of empirical warrant: the case of many-body models in physics

[1]  Tomoji Shogenji,et al.  Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification , 2008 .

[2]  H. Stanley,et al.  Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 2008 .

[3]  Luca Moretti,et al.  Ways in which coherence is confirmation conducive , 2007, Synthese.

[4]  Michael Heidelberger,et al.  Applying Models in Fluid Dynamics , 2006 .

[5]  Axel Gelfert.  Mathematical Rigor in Physics: Putting Exact Results in Their Place , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[6]  Luca Moretti,et al.  On Coherent Sets and the Transmission of Confirmation* , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[7]  S. Nishimoto,et al.  Tomonaga-Luttinger parameters for doped Mott insulators , 2005, cond-mat/0507508.

[8]  C. Castellani,et al.  Pairing and superconductivity from weak to strong coupling in the attractive Hubbard model , 2004, cond-mat/0411637.

[9]  Branden Fitelson.  A probabilistic theory of coherence , 2003 .

[10]  H. Kincaid.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, NANCY CARTWRIGHT. Cambridge University Press, 1999, ix + 240 pages , 2003, Economics and Philosophy.

[11]  Daniela M. Bailer-Jones,et al.  When scientific models represent , 2003 .

[12]  Richard Edwards,et al.  Extending ourselves , 2003 .

[13]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World , 2003, Philosophy of Science.

[14]  Adolfo Avella,et al.  Lectures on the Physics of Highly Correlated Electron Systems VII: Seventh Training Course in the Physics of Correlated Electron Systems and High-Tc Superconductors , 2002 .

[15]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  Asymptotics and the Role of Minimal Models , 2002, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[16]  S. Yi.  The nature of model-based understanding in condensed matter physics , 2002 .

[17]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  The devil in the details : asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence , 2001 .

[18]  Tomoji Shogenji,et al.  The Role of Coherence in Epistemic Justification , 2001 .

[19]  E. Eells,et al.  Measuring Confirmation and Evidence , 2000 .

[20]  W. Nolting.  Ferromagnetism and electronic correlations , 2000 .

[21]  Husain Sarkar,et al.  Empirical equivalence and underdetermination , 2000 .

[22]  N. Cartwright.  The dappled world : a study of the boundaries of science , 1999 .

[23]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation , 1999, Science in Context.

[24]  B. Widom,et al.  Book Review:The Critical Point. A Historical Introduction to the Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena. Cyril Domb, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996 , 1998 .

[25]  Samir Okasha,et al.  Laudan and Leplin on Empirical Equivalence , 1997, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[26]  J. Rowlinson.  The critical point: A historical introduction to the modern theory of critical phenomena , 1997 .

[27]  F. Gebhard,et al.  The Mott Metal-Insulator Transition: Models and Methods , 1997 .

[28]  Logan,et al.  Magnetism in the Hubbard model: An effective spin Hamiltonian approach. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[29]  C. Domb,et al.  The Critical Point: A Historical Introduction To The Modern Theory Of Critical Phenomena , 1996 .

[30]  M. Steiner.  The application of mathematics to natural science , 1989 .

[31]  C. Windsor,et al.  Theoretical and experimental studies on one-dimensional magnetic systems , 1976 .

[32]  J. Hubbard.  Electron correlations in narrow energy bands , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[33]  B. Nijboer.  On the theory of electronic semiconductors , 1939 .

[34]  N. Mott,et al.  Discussion of the paper by de Boer and Verwey , 1937 .

[35]  E. Verwey,et al.  Semi-conductors with partially and with completely filled3d-lattice bands , 1937 .

[36]  A. Wilson,et al.  The Theory of Electronic Semi-Conductors , 1931 .

[37]  F A Gianturco,et al.  Vibrational excitation of CF4 by electron impact: a computational analysis , 2005 .

[38]  Anjan Chakravartty.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2003 .

[39]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Using Models to Represent Reality , 1999 .

[40]  R. Hughes.  Models as Mediators: The Ising model, computer simulation, and universal physics , 1999 .

[41]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediating Instruments , 1999 .

[42]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  Theories, Models, and Representations , 1999 .

[43]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery , 1999, Springer US.

[44]  Marcel Boumans,et al.  Built-In Justification , 1999 .

[45]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators , 1999 .

[46]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators: Models as autonomous agents , 1999 .

[47]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery , 1999 .

[48]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Modelling nature : Between physics and the physical world , 1998 .

[49]  Andre Kukla,et al.  Laudaij, Leplin, empirical equivalence and underdetermination , 1993 .

[50]  R. Baxter.  Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics , 1982 .