Mobility and low contrast trip hazard avoidance using augmented depth

OBJECTIVE We evaluated a novel visual representation for current and near-term prosthetic vision. Augmented depth emphasizes ground obstacles and floor-wall boundaries in a depth-based visual representation. This is achieved by artificially increasing contrast between obstacles and the ground surface via a novel ground plane extraction algorithm specifically designed to preserve low-contrast ground-surface boundaries. APPROACH The effectiveness of augmented depth was examined in human mobility trials compared against standard intensity-based (Intensity), depth-based (Depth) and random (Random) visual representations. Eight participants with normal vision used simulated prosthetic vision with 20 phosphenes and eight perceivable brightness levels to traverse a course with randomly placed small and low-contrast obstacles on the ground. MAIN RESULTS The number of collisions was significantly reduced using augmented depth, compared with intensity, depth and random representations (48%, 44% and 72% less collisions, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE These results indicate that augmented depth may enable safe mobility in the presence of low-contrast obstacles with current and near-term implants. This is the first demonstration that an augmentation of the scene ensuring key objects are visible may provide better outcomes for prosthetic vision.

[1]  S. Lord,et al.  Visual Risk Factors for Falls in Older People , 2001, Age and ageing.

[2]  Jill E. Keeffe,et al.  Expectations of a Visual Prosthesis: Perspectives From People With Impaired Vision , 2010 .

[3]  N Parikh,et al.  Saliency-based image processing for retinal prostheses , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Spencer C. Chen,et al.  Simulating prosthetic vision: I. Visual models of phosphenes , 2009, Vision Research.

[5]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  CC-RANSAC: Fitting planes in the presence of multiple surfaces in range data , 2011, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Paulette Lieby,et al.  Mobility Experiments Using Simulated Prosthetic Vision With 98 Phosphenes Of Limited Dynamic Range , 2012 .

[7]  Li Min Chen,et al.  Optical Imaging of SI Topography in Anesthetized and Awake Squirrel Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  S C Chen,et al.  Visual acuity measurement of prosthetic vision: a virtual-reality simulation study , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Jason Dowling,et al.  Mobility assessment using simulated Arti.cial Human Vision , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops.

[11]  Nick Pears,et al.  Ground plane segmentation for mobile robot visual navigation , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[12]  Farhad Hafezi,et al.  Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  N Parikh,et al.  Performance of visually guided tasks using simulated prosthetic vision and saliency-based cues , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Atsushi Imiya,et al.  Dominant plane detection from optical flow for robot navigation , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Facial recognition using simulated prosthetic pixelized vision. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Robert E. Mahony,et al.  Spatio-Temporal RANSAC for Robust Estimation of Ground Plane in Video Range Images for Automotive Applications , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  G. Medioni,et al.  Piecewise Planar Modeling for Step Detection using Stereo Vision , 2008 .

[21]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  S. Haymes,et al.  Relationship between vision impairment and ability to perform activities of daily living , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  Yi Li,et al.  On Just Noticeable Difference for Bionic Eye , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  J. Rizzo Update on Retinal Prosthetic Research: The Boston Retinal Implant Project , 2011, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[26]  Wageeh Boles,et al.  Mobility enhancement and assessment for a visual prosthesis , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Paulette Lieby,et al.  Low Contrast Trip Hazard Avoidance using Simulated Prosthetic Vision , 2012 .

[28]  Nicolas P. Cottaris,et al.  A cortical (V1) neurophysiological recording model for assessing the efficacy of retinal visual prostheses , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  M. Mcmahon,et al.  Retinal prosthesis phosphene shape analysis , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  Paulette Lieby,et al.  Evaluating Lanczos2 Image Filtering for Visual Acuity In Simulated Prosthetic Vision , 2013 .

[31]  Paulette Lieby,et al.  Evaluating Depth-based Visual Representations For Mobility In Simulated Prosthetic Vision , 2012 .

[32]  Chuanqing Zhou,et al.  Chinese character recognition using simulated phosphene maps. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  M. Humayun,et al.  MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE MACULA IN EYES WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY DUE TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2002, Retina.

[35]  M H Chang,et al.  Facial identification in very low-resolution images simulating prosthetic vision , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[36]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Real and virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[37]  Nick Barnes,et al.  Surface Extraction from Iso-disparity Contours , 2010, ACCV.

[38]  C I Howarth,et al.  The efficiency and walking speed of visually impaired people. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[39]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[40]  Heather Hartwell,et al.  Mental health and wellbeing , 2015, Perspectives in public health.

[41]  Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[42]  Marc Pollefeys,et al.  Iso-disparity Surfaces for General Stereo Configurations , 2004, ECCV.

[43]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  G. Brindley,et al.  The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[46]  Tobi Delbrück,et al.  A silicon early visual system as a model animal , 2004, Vision Research.

[47]  Christian A. Morillas,et al.  Bioinspired Stimulus Encoder for Cortical Visual Neuroprostheses , 2005 .

[48]  E. Zrenner Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision ? , 2002 .

[49]  Atsushi Imiya,et al.  Visual Navigation of Mobile Robot Using Optical Flow and Visual Potential Field , 2008, RobVis.

[50]  Kai-Tai Song,et al.  Robust ground plane detection for obstacle avoidance of mobile robots using a monocular camera , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[51]  James Weiland,et al.  A wearable system for the visually impaired , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[52]  Michael Brady,et al.  Ground plane estimation, error analysis and applications , 2002, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[53]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Appearance-Based Obstacle Detection with Monocular Color Vision , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[54]  Leon Axel,et al.  Extracting tissue deformation using Gabor filter banks , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[55]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Interim Performance Results from the Second Sight® ArgusTM II Retinal Prosthesis Study , 2010 .

[56]  K. Horch,et al.  Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system , 1992, Vision Research.

[57]  Nick Barnes,et al.  Substituting depth for intensity and real-time phosphene rendering: Visual navigation under low vision conditions , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.