Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space

A series of experiments provide evidence that affordances rely not only on the mutual appropriateness of the features of an object and the abilities of an individual, but also on the fact that those features fall within her own reachable space, thus being really ready-to-her-own-hand. We used a spatial alignment effect paradigm and systematically examined this effect when the visually presented object was located either within or outside the peripersonal space of the participants, both from a metric (Experiment 1) and from a functional point of view (Experiment 2). We found that objectual features evoke actions only when the object is presented within the portion of the peripersonal space that is effectively reachable by the participants. Experiments 3 and 4 ruled out that our results could be merely accounted for by differences in the visual salience of the presented objects. Our data suggest that the power of an object to automatically trigger an action is strictly linked to the effective possibility that an individual has to interact with it.

[1]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Widening the Sphere of Influence: Using a Tool to Extend Extrapersonal Visual Space in a Patient with Severe Neglect , 2002, Neurocase.

[3]  T Landis,et al.  So near yet so far: Neglect in far or near space depends on tool use , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[4]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[5]  S. Vogt,et al.  Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space coding by premotor cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions and Emotions , 2007 .

[12]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[15]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[16]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Bub,et al.  Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  Anthony Chemero,et al.  What We Perceive When We Perceive Affordances: Commentary on Michaels (2000) "Information, Perception, and Action" , 2001 .

[21]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 1988, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[25]  Maurizio Ferrarin,et al.  Bisecting Lines with Different Tools in Right Brain Damaged Patients: The Role of Action Programming and Sensory Feedback in Modulating Spatial Remapping , 2007, Cortex.

[26]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[27]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[28]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[29]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  REVIEW ■ : Multiple Representations of Space in the Brain , 1995 .

[33]  M. Bassolino,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users , 2022 .

[34]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Dynamic Size-Change of Peri-Hand Space Following Tool-Use: Determinants and Spatial Characteristics Revealed Through Cross-Modal Extinction , 2007, Cortex.

[35]  C F Michaels,et al.  Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981) , 1981, Cognition.

[37]  A. Chemero Radical Embodied Cognitive Science , 2009 .

[38]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[39]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Information, Perception, and Action: A Reply to Commentators , 2001 .

[40]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[41]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.