A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.

Despite scholarly criticism, juror attitudes or individual differences might affect verdict choice in criminal trials. Authoritarianism is a face valid predictor. Twenty studies exploring the authoritarianism-verdict relation were meta-analyzed to test this hypothesis. Authoritarianism measure (traditional or legal), subject type, presentation medium of trial, and type of crime were examined as moderators of the effect. Results support an authoritarianism-verdict relation and the moderator effect of authoritarianism type. Legal authoritarianism correlated more strongly with verdict. Subject type, presentation medium, and type of crime were also significant moderators. Implications for future research, as well as for legal and judicial practice, are discussed

[1]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire , 1993 .

[2]  D. Winter,et al.  Authoritarianism and Attitudes toward Contemporary Social Issues , 1993 .

[3]  G. Moran,et al.  Jury selection in insanity defense cases , 1992 .

[4]  G. Moran,et al.  A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity1 , 1992 .

[5]  Blair T. Johnson.  DSTAT : software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures , 1992 .

[6]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[7]  G. Moran,et al.  The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity1 , 1991 .

[8]  S. Penrod,et al.  Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help? , 1990 .

[9]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  The Determinants of Mock Jurors' Verdicts in a Rape Case1 , 1990 .

[10]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis , 1990 .

[11]  C. E. Willis,et al.  In the Jury Box: Controversies in the Courtroom , 1987 .

[12]  Susan E. Jones.  Judge-versus attorney-conducted voir dire , 1987 .

[13]  Christy A. Visher.  Juror decision making , 1987 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Correspondence Between Health Attitudes and Behavior , 1986 .

[15]  L. L. Marshall,et al.  The Effects of Demand Characteristics, Evaluation Anxiety, and Expectancy on Juror Honesty During Voir Dire , 1986 .

[16]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social and behavioral consequences of alcohol consumption and expectancy: a meta-analysis. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  C. Haney.  On the selection of capital juries , 1984 .

[18]  Robert Fitzgerald,et al.  Due process vs. crime control , 1984 .

[19]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness , 1984 .

[20]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation , 1984 .

[21]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  The construction and validation of a juror bias scale , 1983 .

[22]  R. McGowen,et al.  Effects of Authoritarian, Anti-Authoritarian, and Egalitarian Legal Attitudes on Mock Juror and Jury Decisions , 1982 .

[23]  J. Lamberth,et al.  Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism , 1982 .

[24]  G. Moran,et al.  Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior. , 1982 .

[25]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Conviction Proneness and the Authoritarian Juror: Inability to Disregard Information or Attitudinal Bias? , 1982 .

[26]  D. Ward.  Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[27]  A. Sealy,et al.  Another look at social psychological aspects of juror bias , 1981 .

[28]  D. Byrne,et al.  Introduction to Personality , 1981 .

[29]  J. Hepburn.  The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selection , 1980 .

[30]  Ebbe B. Ebbesen,et al.  External validity of research in legal psychology , 1979 .

[31]  Audrey J. Noble,et al.  Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. , 1978 .

[32]  W. Griffitt,et al.  Evaluation and recall of evidence: Authoritarianism and the Patty Hearst case , 1978 .

[33]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court , 1978 .

[34]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[35]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures of social psychological attitudes , 1976 .

[36]  S. Sue,et al.  Authoritarianism, Pretrial Publicity, and Awareness of Bias in Simulated Jurors , 1975, Psychological reports.

[37]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Authoritarianism and Recall of Evidence about Criminal Behavior. , 1975 .

[38]  D. Granberg,et al.  Authoritarianism, dogmatism and orientations toward the Vietnam war. , 1972, Sociometry.

[39]  R. Athanasiou.  Technique without Mystique: a Study of Authoritarianism in Engineering Students , 1968 .

[40]  G. Moran,et al.  Double agreement as a function of item ambiguity and susceptibility to demand implications of the psychological situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  R. Epstein.  Authoritarianism, displaced aggression, and social status of the target. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  R. Crutchfield.  Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[43]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[44]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[45]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[46]  R. Christie.  CHAPTER 10 – Authoritarianism and Related Constructs , 1991 .

[47]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[48]  R. Helson.  An Introduction to Personality. 3rd ed. , 1981 .

[49]  T. Blass.  Personality variables in social behavior , 1977 .

[50]  D. Byrne,et al.  The defendant's dilemma: effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  George L. Jurow.  New Data on the Effect of a "Death Qualified" Jury on the Guilt Determination Process , 1971 .