A simulation study with a new performance index for pressure-retarded osmosis processes hybridized with seawater reverse osmosis and membrane distillation

Abstract Despite many kinds of research on pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO), feasibility studies for PRO are still insufficient. To provide a better understanding of PRO-hybridized processes, an energy efficiency analysis should reflect the hybridization features of three processes, including PRO, seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO), and membrane distillation (MD). To this end, a new dimensionless (i.e., unitless or scale-free) performance index is proposed to facilitate a fair comparison of energy efficiency between SWRO-PRO and SWRO-MD-PRO. The new performance index physically implies a ratio of the total energy recovered by PRO to the total energy consumed by SWRO and MD. The performances of hybridized processes were estimated with the new index and compared to each other after running several simulations. The simulation results showed that SWRO-MD-PRO generally has a higher energy efficiency than SWRO-PRO if an inexpensive heat source, such as waste heat, is used. However, the energy efficiencies of both PRO-hybridized processes were different according to the simulation conditions. Therefore, it can be concluded that energy optimization for PRO-hybridized processes should be conducted differently than for SWRO. The results from this study are expected to play a key role in providing a new roadmap for PRO-hybridized process research.

[1]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  Energy recovery from concentrated seawater brine by thin-film nanofiber composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes with high power density , 2013 .

[2]  Jeffrey A. Ruskowitz,et al.  RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination , 2014 .

[3]  M. Kurihara,et al.  SWRO-PRO System in “Mega-ton Water System” for Energy Reduction and Low Environmental Impact , 2018 .

[4]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[5]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Numerical analysis of performance of ideal counter-current flow pressure retarded osmosis , 2018 .

[6]  Jeffrey R. McCutcheon,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of energy density in pressure retarded osmosis: The impact of solution volumes and costs , 2015 .

[7]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Design and fabrication of inner-selective thin-film composite (TFC) hollow fiber modules for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) , 2017 .

[8]  Yue-xiao Shen,et al.  A framework for accurate evaluation of the promise of aquaporin based biomimetic membranes , 2015 .

[9]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity , 2017, Science.

[10]  A. Tanioka,et al.  Power generation with salinity gradient by pressure retarded osmosis using concentrated brine from SWRO system and treated sewage as pure water , 2012 .

[11]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes , 2016 .

[12]  N. Hilal,et al.  Dual stage PRO power generation from brackish water brine and wastewater effluent feeds , 2016 .

[13]  Anthony P. Straub,et al.  Thermodynamic limits of extractable energy by pressure retarded osmosis , 2014 .

[14]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Design optimization of high performance dual stage pressure retarded osmosis , 2015 .

[16]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) hybrid processes: Model-based scenario study , 2013 .

[17]  Ji Hye Kim,et al.  Pressure Retarded Osmosis Process: Current Status and Future , 2014 .

[18]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Nature gives the best solution for desalination: Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance , 2015 .

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Module-scale analysis of pressure retarded osmosis: performance limitations and implications for full-scale operation. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Chun Feng Wan,et al.  Osmotic power generation by pressure retarded osmosis using seawater brine as the draw solution and wastewater retentate as the feed , 2015 .

[21]  Wei He,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based modelling of osmotic energy generation using pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) , 2016 .

[22]  Sharad Kumar Gupta,et al.  Modeling of a forward osmosis and a pressure-retarded osmosis spiral wound module using the Spiegler-Kedem model and experimental validation , 2016 .

[23]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination , 2014 .

[24]  Peter Agre,et al.  Aquaporin water channels (Nobel Lecture). , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Chun Feng Wan,et al.  Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes , 2016 .

[26]  E. Drioli,et al.  Membrane Distillation and Related Operations—A Review , 2005 .

[27]  J. Lienhard,et al.  Limits of power production due to finite membrane area in pressure retarded osmosis , 2014 .

[28]  Zhangxin Wang,et al.  Gross vs. net energy: Towards a rational framework for assessing the practical viability of pressure retarded osmosis , 2016 .

[29]  Wei He,et al.  Energy and thermodynamic analysis of power generation using a natural salinity gradient based pressure retarded osmosis process , 2014 .

[30]  J. Grossman,et al.  Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. , 2012, Nano letters.

[31]  Yang Wang,et al.  Modelling of osmotic energy from natural salt gradients due to pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of detrimental factors and flow schemes , 2014 .

[32]  E. Nagy,et al.  Improvement of the energy generation by pressure retarded osmosis , 2016 .

[33]  Ludovic F. Dumée,et al.  Advances in Membrane Distillation for Water Desalination and Purification Applications , 2013 .

[34]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[35]  Ji Hye Kim,et al.  Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review , 2015 .

[36]  M. Platzer,et al.  Seawater Desalination , 2020, The Green Energy Ship Concept.

[37]  Ian S. Metcalfe,et al.  Sonocatalytic oxidation processes for the removal of contaminants containing aromatic rings from aqueous effluents , 2004 .

[38]  P. Christofides,et al.  Minimization of energy consumption for a two-pass membrane desalination: Effect of energy recovery, membrane rejection and retentate recycling , 2009 .

[39]  Charles James Lemckert,et al.  Osmotic power with Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Theory, performance and trends – A review , 2014 .

[40]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Direct contact membrane distillation with heat recovery: Thermodynamic insights from module scale modeling , 2014 .

[41]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Thermodynamic, energy efficiency, and power density analysis of reverse electrodialysis power generation with natural salinity gradients. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Stein Erik Skilhagen,et al.  Osmotic power — power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients , 2008 .

[43]  P. Christofides,et al.  Effect of Thermodynamic Restriction on Energy Cost Optimization of RO Membrane Water Desalination , 2009 .

[44]  H. Shon,et al.  Performance analysis of reverse osmosis, membrane distillation, and pressure-retarded osmosis hybrid processes , 2016 .

[45]  Akshay Deshmukh,et al.  Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable? , 2016 .

[46]  X. Duan,et al.  Graphene nanomesh , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[47]  F. Tadeo,et al.  Osmotic energy recovery from Reverse Osmosis using two-stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis , 2017 .

[48]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation — Review , 2010 .