Quantitative validation of a new coregistration algorithm

The Neuro900 Image Coregistration Software (Strichman Medical Equipment) for SPECT was evaluated for translational and rotational registration accuracy. A Tc-99m HM-PAO split-dose study (0.53 mCi low dose, L, and 1.01 mCi high dose, H) was simulated with a Hoffman Brain Phantom with five fiducial markers. Translation error was determined by a shift in image centroid, and rotation error was determined by a simplified two-axis approach. Changes in registration accuracy were measured with respect to: 1) slice spacing, using the four different combinations LL, LH, HL, HH, 2) translational misalignment before coregistration, 3) changes in the step size of the iterative parameters. In all the cases the algorithm converged with only small difference in translation offset, /spl theta/ and /spl phi/. At 6 mm slice spacing, translational errors ranged from 0.9 to 2.8 mm (system resolution at 100 mm, 6.8 mm). The converged parameters showed little sensitivity to count density. In addition the correlation coefficient increased with decreasing iterative step size, as expected. Based on the authors' results, they found that this algorithm based on the maximization of the correlation coefficient between studies was an effective and efficient way to coregister SPECT data.<<ETX>>

[1]  D. Weber,et al.  Correlative image registration. , 1994, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[2]  J C Honeyman,et al.  A technique to localize activation in the human brain with technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT: a validation study using visual stimulation. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  N Lange,et al.  Some computational and statistical tools for paired comparisons of digital images , 1994, Statistical methods in medical research.

[4]  T. Turkington,et al.  Accuracy of registration of PET, SPECT and MR images of a brain phantom. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  B Gibaud,et al.  Data fusion in medical imaging: merging multimodal and multipatient images, identification of structures and 3D display aspects. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[7]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Computer-assisted superimposition of magnetic resonance and high-resolution technetium-99m-HMPAO and thallium-201 SPECT images of the brain. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  R A Robb,et al.  A software system for interactive and quantitative visualization of multidimensional biomedical images. , 1991, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[10]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Quantitative And Qualitative Comparison Of Volumetric And Surface Rendering Techniques , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Localisation in PET Images: Direct Fitting of the Intercommissural (AC—PC) Line , 1989 .

[13]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.