Spatial pedagogy: mapping meanings in the use of classroom space

The positioning and movement of the teacher in the classroom are fundamental to the pedagogical process. Specific spaces in the classroom take on certain meanings because of the nature of pedagogic discourse that occurs on the site and the positioning and distance of the site relative to the students and the teaching resources. Spatial pedagogy is realised through the patterns of positioning and the directionality of movement, as well as the intersemiotic correspondences in the use of space with other semiotic resources (e.g. language, gesture and teaching materials). This paper investigates the different types of space in the classroom and their associated meanings. It also discusses an approach for annotating the teacher’s use of space, and the usefulness of visualising this annotation through digital graphical methods. The notion of ‘structured informality’ in the classroom is proposed through data analysis of two teachers conducting similar lessons, but with apparently different pedagogical styles.

[1]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[2]  C. Matthiessen.  Multisemiosis and Context-Based Register Typology: Registerial Variation in the Complementarity of Semiotic Systems , 2009 .

[3]  D. Walburn,et al.  London/New York , 2009 .

[4]  Michel Foucault,et al.  “Panopticism” from Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2009 .

[5]  Kay L. O’Halloran,et al.  Historical Changes in the Semiotic Landscape: From Calculation to Computation , 2009 .

[6]  Len Unsworth,et al.  E-literature for Children: Enhancing Digital Literacy Learning , 2005 .

[7]  J. Foley.  Language, Education and Discourse: Functional Approaches , 2004 .

[8]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[9]  Mary J. Schleppegrell,et al.  The Linguistic Challenges of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Research Review , 2007 .

[10]  Karen Bryer.  Assessment and National Educational Goals: The Core Knowledge Skills Subjects in the Pre-University Curriculum in Singapore , 2008 .

[11]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Literacy in the New Media Age , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Explorations in the functions of language , 1973 .

[13]  Maree Kristen Stenglin,et al.  Space odyssey: towards a social semiotic model of three-dimensional space , 2009 .

[14]  Anthony Dekker,et al.  Conceptual Distance in Social Network Analysis , 2005, J. Soc. Struct..

[15]  G. Kress,et al.  Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication , 2002 .

[16]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Change and External Events in Computer-Mediated Citation Networks: English Language Weblogs and the 2004 U.S. Electoral Cycle* , 2009, J. Soc. Struct..

[17]  C. Jewitt.  Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms , 2008 .

[18]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach , 2005 .

[19]  Donald Matheson.  Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication , 2002 .

[20]  Len Unsworth,et al.  Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice , 2001 .

[21]  M. Halliday.  Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning , 1976 .

[22]  E. Keenan.  Dimensions in Sociolinguistics , 1975, Language in Society.

[23]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[24]  Adam Kendon,et al.  Spacing and Orientation in Co-present Interaction , 2009, COST 2102 Training School.

[25]  G. Kress,et al.  English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[26]  Kay L. O’Halloran,et al.  Classroom Discourse in Mathematics: A Multisemiotic Analysis , 1998 .

[27]  Carey Jewitt.  The changing pedagogic landscape of subject English in UK classrooms , 2011 .

[28]  B. Wilson.  Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[29]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  The Art and Science of Dynamic Network Visualization , 2006, J. Soc. Struct..

[30]  L. Unsworth.  Towards a Metalanguage for Multiliteracies Education: Describing the Meaning-Making Resources of Language-Image Interaction. , 2006 .

[31]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[32]  Kay L. O’Halloran,et al.  Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images , 2004 .