Chapter 17 – Understanding the Argentinean and Colombian Electricity Markets

Publisher Summary This chapter makes comparisons between Argentina and Colombia to develop a better understanding of how the different models of deregulation shaped the evolution of their electricity systems. Both countries deregulated over 10 years ago and as such provide a period where analysis and comparison can begin to yield insights into the consequences of both the initial and later decisions on the evolution of the electricity system. After the initial transformation, the two countries almost “froze” the reforms and no substantial adjustments were made to cope with the challenges that emerged subsequently. Argentina faced the problem, because the regulator avoided creating uncertainty for investors about revenues in the future by allowing a relatively high tariff. A similar situation occurred in Colombia. This might make the situation better for the investors, but might create another set of problems as consumers do not see sufficient benefits from the reforms. The new round of reforms should take into account different aspects of the problem—they should consider an economic recovery of the region, they may rely more on market institutions, and the future design should take into account the possibility of creating regional integration.

[1]  O. C. Herfindahl Concentration in the steel industry , 1950 .

[2]  A. Hirschman THE PATERNITY OF AN INDEX , 1964 .

[3]  Pablo T. Spiller,et al.  International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation: How should it be done? Electricity regulation in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Chile , 1996 .

[4]  Hugh Rudnick,et al.  Second Generation Electricity Reforms in Latin America and the California Paradigm , 2002 .

[5]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Sensitivity of reserve margin to factors influencing investment behaviour in the electricity market of England and Wales , 1992 .

[6]  R. Bacon,et al.  Global electric power reform, privatization and liberalization of the electric power industry in developing countries , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Boom and Bust in Power Plant Construction: Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis , 2002 .

[8]  García M. Mario,et al.  Reform and regulation of electricity in colombia -uk experiences taken across the atlantic , 2000 .

[9]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  From planning to strategy in the electricity industry , 2001 .

[10]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Deregulation in electricity: understanding strategic and regulatory risk , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Andrew Ford,et al.  A Simulation Study of Power Plant Construction in California , 2001 .

[12]  D. Bunn Evaluating the Effects of Privatizing Electricity , 1994 .

[13]  Alexander Galetovic,et al.  Regulatory governance and chile's 1998–1999 electricity shortage , 2001 .

[14]  Isaac Dyner,et al.  Electricity market reform in Argentina: assessing the impact for the poor in Buenos Aires , 2005 .

[15]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Lessons from deregulation in Colombia: successes, failures and the way ahead , 2004 .