Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley

Stimuli that resemble humans, but are not perfectly human-like, are disliked compared to distinctly human and non-human stimuli. Accounts of this “Uncanny Valley” effect often focus on how changes in human resemblance can evoke different emotional responses. We present an alternate account based on the novel hypothesis that the Uncanny Valley is not directly related to ‘human-likeness’ per se, but instead reflects a more general form of stimulus devaluation that occurs when inhibition is triggered to resolve conflict between competing stimulus-related representations. We consider existing support for this inhibitory-devaluation hypothesis and further assess its feasibility through tests of two corresponding predictions that arise from the link between conflict-resolving inhibition and aversive response: (1) that the pronounced disliking of Uncanny-type stimuli will occur for any image that strongly activates multiple competing stimulus representations, even in the absence of any human-likeness, and (2) that the negative peak of an ‘Uncanny Valley’ should occur at the point of greatest stimulus-related conflict and not (in the presence of human-likeness) always closer to the ‘human’ end of a perceptual continuum. We measured affective responses to a set of line drawings representing non-human animal–animal morphs, in which each continuum midpoint was a bistable image (Experiment 1), as well as to sets of human-robot and human-animal computer-generated morphs (Experiment 2). Affective trends depicting classic Uncanny Valley functions occurred for all continua, including the non-human stimuli. Images at continua midpoints elicited significantly more negative affect than images at endpoints, even when the continua included a human endpoint. This illustrates the feasibility of the inhibitory-devaluation hypothesis and the need for further research into the possibility that the strong dislike of Uncanny-type stimuli reflects the negative affective consequences of cognitive inhibition.

[1]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[3]  G H Fisher,et al.  Measuring ambiguity. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  R. Croyle,et al.  Dissonance arousal: physiological evidence. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  A. Fallon,et al.  A perspective on disgust. , 1987, Psychological review.

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance May Enhance Sympathetic Tonus, but Attitudes Are Changed to Reduce Negative Affect Rather than Arousal , 1990 .

[7]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[8]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[9]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  On the dynamics of static pattern perception , 1995 .

[11]  V. Vieland,et al.  Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm , 1998 .

[12]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[15]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[17]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  E. Harmon-Jones Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[19]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[20]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[22]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Ambiguous Figures: Living versus Nonliving Objects , 2004, Perception.

[23]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[26]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  Attentional Inhibition Has Social-Emotional Consequences for Unfamiliar Faces , 2005, Psychological science.

[27]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[29]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[30]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Efficient Attentional Selection Predicts Distractor Devaluation: Event-related Potential Evidence for a Direct Link between Attention and Emotion , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[32]  C. Carter,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  A. Nobre,et al.  Response Inhibition is Linked to Emotional Devaluation: Behavioural and Electrophysiological Evidence , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[35]  Oren Griffiths,et al.  Negative priming reduces affective ratings , 2008 .

[36]  Jane Raymond,et al.  Interactions of attention, emotion and motivation. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[37]  G. Rees,et al.  The Neural Bases of Multistable Perception , 2022 .

[38]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  I. Liberzon,et al.  The Neurocircuitry of Fear, Stress, and Anxiety Disorders , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[41]  Mark Grimshaw,et al.  Facial expression of emotion and perception of the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  J. Kawahara,et al.  Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  A Unified Framework for Inhibitory Control Opinion , 2022 .

[44]  R. Davidson,et al.  The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley , 2011, i-Perception.

[46]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[47]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[48]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Can you eat it? A link between categorization difficulty and food likability , 2012, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[49]  Roger K. Moore A Bayesian explanation of the ‘Uncanny Valley’ effect and related psychological phenomena , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[50]  M. Fenske,et al.  The affective consequences of cognitive inhibition: devaluation or neutralization? , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  A. Nobre,et al.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[52]  M. Fenske,et al.  Hot or Not: Response Inhibition Reduces the Hedonic Value and Motivational Incentive of Sexual Stimuli , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[53]  Neural Correlates of Cognitive Dissonance and Decision Conflict , 2013 .

[54]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon , 2013 .

[55]  T. Howard,et al.  Can Looking at a Hand Make Your Skin Crawl? Peering into the Uncanny Valley for Hands , 2013, Perception.

[56]  Marcus Cheetham,et al.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[57]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[58]  Guy L. Lacroix,et al.  Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  L. Jancke,et al.  Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a “Happy Valley” , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[61]  Steven O. Entezari,et al.  Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley , 2015 .

[62]  Alessio Avenanti,et al.  Cathodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex diminishes choice-induced preference change. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Tyler J. Burleigh,et al.  A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization? , 2015, Front. Psychol..