Delaying Ambulation Mode Transition Decisions Improves Accuracy of a Flexible Control System for Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis

Powered lower limb prostheses can assist users in a variety of ambulation modes by providing knee and/or ankle joint power. This study’s goal was to develop a flexible control system to allow users to perform a variety of tasks in a natural, accurate, and reliable way. Six transfemoral amputees used a powered knee-ankle prosthesis to ascend/descend a ramp, climb a 3- and 4-step staircase, perform walking and standing transitions to and from the staircase, and ambulate at various speeds. A mode-specific classification architecture was developed to allow seamless transitions at four discrete gait events. Prosthesis mode transitions (i.e., the prosthesis’ mechanical response) were delayed by 90 ms. Overall, users were not affected by this small delay. Offline classification results demonstrate significantly reduced error rates with the delayed system compared to the non-delayed system (p < 0.001). The average error rate for all heel contact decisions was 1.65% [0.99%] for the non-delayed system and 0.43% [0.23%] for the delayed system. The average error rate for all toe off decisions was 0.47% [0.16%] for the non-delayed system and 0.13% [0.05%] for the delayed system. The results are encouraging and provide another step towards a clinically viable intent recognition system for a powered knee-ankle prosthesis.

[1]  Ming Liu,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Mode Recognition Errors on Volitional Control of Powered Above-Knee Prostheses , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[3]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Volitional control of ankle plantar flexion in a powered transtibial prosthesis during stair-ambulation , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Investigation of Timing to Switch Control Mode in Powered Knee Prostheses during Task Transitions , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Control of Stair Ascent and Descent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Malte Bellmann,et al.  Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Configuring a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for Transfemoral Amputees within Five Specific Ambulation Modes , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  T.G. Sugar,et al.  SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[9]  Ming Liu,et al.  Development of an Environment-Aware Locomotion Mode Recognition System for Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Controlling Knee Swing Initiation and Ankle Plantarflexion With an Active Prosthesis on Level and Inclined Surfaces at Variable Walking Speeds , 2014, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[12]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A Training Method for Locomotion Mode Prediction Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  An intent recognition strategy for transfemoral amputee ambulation across different locomotion modes , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: a randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[16]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Classification Method for User-Independent Intent Recognition for Transfemoral Amputees Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Intent Recognition in a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Time History Information , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Depth Sensing for Improved Control of Lower Limb Prostheses , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Real-time gait mode intent recognition of a powered knee and ankle prosthesis for standing and walking , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[21]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Effect of additional mechanical sensor data on an EMG-based pattern recognition system for a powered leg prosthesis , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[22]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[23]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Powered sit-to-stand and assistive stand-to-sit framework for a powered transfemoral prosthesis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[26]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Robotic Leg Prosthesis: Design, Control, and Implementation , 2014, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.