CRISPR/Cas9-based epigenome editing: An overview of dCas9-based tools with special emphasis on off-target activity.

Molecular tools for gene regulation and epigenome editing consist of two main parts: the targeting moiety binding a specific genomic locus and the effector domain performing the editing or regulatory function. The advent of CRISPR-Cas9 technology enabled easy and flexible targeting of almost any locus by co-expression of a small sgRNA molecule, which is complementary to the target sequence and forms a complex with Cas9, directing it to that particular target. Here, we review strategies for recruitment of effector domains, used in gene regulation and epigenome editing, to the dCas9 DNA-targeting protein. To date, the most important CRISPR-Cas9 applications in gene regulation are CRISPR activation or interference, while epigenome editing focuses on targeted changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Several strategies for signal amplification by recruitment of multiple effector domains deserve special focus. While some approaches rely on altering the sgRNA molecule and extending it with aptamers for effector domain recruitment, others use modifications to the Cas9 protein by direct fusions with effector domains or by addition of an epitope tag, which also has the ability to bind multiple effector domains. A major barrier to the widespread use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology for therapeutic purposes is its off-target effect. We review efforts to enhance CRISPR-Cas9 specificity by selection of Cas9 orthologs from various bacterial species and their further refinement by introduction of beneficial mutations. The molecular tools available today enable a researcher to choose the best balance of targeting flexibility, activity amplification, delivery method and specificity.

[1]  Donald J. Zack,et al.  Expansion of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome targeting space through the use of H1 promoter-expressed guide–RNAs , 2014, Nature Communications.

[2]  R. Maehr,et al.  Controlling transcription in human pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR-effectors. , 2016, Methods.

[3]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Quan Du,et al.  Profiling single-guide RNA specificity reveals a mismatch sensitive core sequence , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  R. Beerli,et al.  Engineering polydactyl zinc-finger transcription factors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  J. Bonventre,et al.  The Krüppel-associated box-A (KRAB-A) domain of zinc finger proteins mediates transcriptional repression. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Robust, synergistic regulation of human gene expression using TALE activators , 2013, Nature Methods.

[9]  Aviv Regev,et al.  RNA targeting with CRISPR–Cas13 , 2017, Nature.

[10]  Sylvain Moineau,et al.  Cleavage of Phage DNA by the Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR3-Cas System , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[12]  Randall J. Platt,et al.  Optical Control of Mammalian Endogenous Transcription and Epigenetic States , 2013, Nature.

[13]  David A. Scott,et al.  Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity , 2013, Cell.

[14]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 to increase its specificity , 2017, Nature Communications.

[15]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[16]  P. Hsu,et al.  Methods for Optimizing CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Specificity. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[17]  Donghai Wu,et al.  Comparison of TALE designer transcription factors and the CRISPR/dCas9 in regulation of gene expression by targeting enhancers , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Judith Frydman,et al.  A direct regulatory interaction between chaperonin TRiC and stress-responsive transcription factor HSF1. , 2014, Cell reports.

[20]  Robert W. Burgess,et al.  Gene therapies for axonal neuropathies: Available strategies, successes to date, and what to target next , 2020, Brain Research.

[21]  R. Maehr,et al.  Cas9 effector-mediated regulation of transcription and differentiation in human pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Development.

[22]  J. Martial,et al.  The evolutionarily conserved Krüppel-associated box domain defines a subfamily of eukaryotic multifingered proteins. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Nicholas E. Propson,et al.  Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy , 2017, Nature.

[25]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Complex transcriptional modulation with orthogonal and inducible dCas9 regulators , 2016, Nature Methods.

[26]  David A. Scott,et al.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Nature.

[27]  Christopher M. Vockley,et al.  RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9-based transcription factors , 2013, Nature Methods.

[28]  Morgan L. Maeder,et al.  Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9: a smaller Cas9 for all-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and paired nickase applications , 2015, Genome Biology.

[29]  James J. Collins,et al.  Using Targeted Chromatin Regulators to Engineer Combinatorial and Spatial Transcriptional Regulation , 2014, Cell.

[30]  Charles A. Gersbach,et al.  Bidirectional approaches for optogenetic regulation of gene expression in mammalian cells using Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  The New State of the Art: Cas9 for Gene Activation and Repression , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  G. Church,et al.  Cas9 gRNA engineering for genome editing, activation and repression , 2015, Nature Methods.

[33]  Yanfang Jiang,et al.  Targeted activation of diverse CRISPR-Cas systems for mammalian genome editing via proximal CRISPR targeting , 2017, Nature Communications.

[34]  Nevan J Krogan,et al.  CRISPR Interference Efficiently Induces Specific and Reversible Gene Silencing in Human iPSCs. , 2016, Cell stem cell.

[35]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Direct activation of human and mouse Oct4 genes using engineered TALE and Cas9 transcription factors , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[38]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Engineering Complex Synthetic Transcriptional Programs with CRISPR RNA Scaffolds , 2015, Cell.

[39]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Engineering of CRISPR-Cas12b for human genome editing , 2019, Nature Communications.

[40]  James J. Collins,et al.  Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6 , 2018, Science.

[41]  P. Datta,et al.  Epigenetic Regulation of Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 2 in Neurological Disorders , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[42]  Ji Luo,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout is insensitive to target copy number but is dependent on guide RNA potency and Cas9/sgRNA threshold expression level , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  H. Thiesen,et al.  Krüppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Moritoshi Sato,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9-based photoactivatable transcription system. , 2015, Chemistry & biology.

[46]  Guohui Chuai,et al.  DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning , 2018, Genome Biology.

[47]  Takanori Nakane,et al.  Structure and Engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9 , 2016, Cell.

[48]  R. Lister,et al.  A modular dCas9-SunTag DNMT3A epigenome editing system overcomes pervasive off-target activity of direct fusion dCas9-DNMT3A constructs , 2018, bioRxiv.

[49]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA , 2010, Nature.

[50]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[51]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[52]  Nipun Verma,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-Based Engineering of the Epigenome. , 2017, Cell stem cell.

[53]  Panpan Lu,et al.  Designed transcription activator-like effector proteins efficiently induced the expression of latent HIV-1 in latently infected cells. , 2015, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[54]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Creating and evaluating accurate CRISPR-Cas9 scalpels for genomic surgery , 2015, Nature Methods.

[55]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Multiplexed activation of endogenous genes by CRISPR-on, an RNA-guided transcriptional activator system , 2013, Cell Research.

[56]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Orthogonal gene knock out and activation with a catalytically active Cas9 nuclease , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[57]  C. Gersbach,et al.  A light-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[58]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Highly-efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming , 2015, Nature Methods.

[59]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins , 2001, Nature.

[60]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[61]  Jun Ma,et al.  GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator , 1988, Nature.

[62]  Kunling Chen,et al.  Perfectly matched 20-nucleotide guide RNA sequences enable robust genome editing using high-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases , 2017, Genome Biology.

[63]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A CRISPR-based approach for targeted DNA demethylation , 2016, Cell Discovery.

[64]  W. D. Cress,et al.  Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. , 1991, Science.

[65]  David R. Liu,et al.  Small Molecule-Triggered Cas9 Protein with Improved Genome-Editing Specificity , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[66]  Yinqing Li,et al.  Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Cell.

[67]  Christopher M. Vockley,et al.  Epigenome editing by a CRISPR/Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[68]  G. Church,et al.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[69]  Tammy Chang,et al.  A Small Molecule-Controlled Cas9 Repressible System , 2020, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[70]  M. Ehlers,et al.  Rapid blue light induction of protein interactions in living cells , 2010, Nature Methods.

[71]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Recognition of CRISPR/Cas9 off‐target sites through ensemble learning of uneven mismatch distributions , 2018, Bioinform..

[72]  Davide Cittaro,et al.  Inheritable Silencing of Endogenous Genes by Hit-and-Run Targeted Epigenetic Editing , 2016, Cell.

[73]  Tautvydas Karvelis,et al.  Targeted gene editing by transfection of in vitro reconstituted Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9 nuclease complex , 2015, RNA biology.

[74]  Yoon-Sang Kim,et al.  A zinc-finger transcriptional activator designed to interact with the gamma-globin gene promoters enhances fetal hemoglobin production in primary human adult erythroblasts. , 2010, Blood.

[75]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Efficient genome engineering in eukaryotes using Cas9 from Streptococcus thermophilus , 2014, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[76]  Yonatan Stelzer,et al.  Editing DNA Methylation in the Mammalian Genome , 2016, Cell.

[77]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity , 2018, Science.

[78]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[79]  Vanja Tadić,et al.  Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[80]  Alexandro E. Trevino,et al.  Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex , 2014, Nature.

[81]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Naturally Occurring Off-Switches for CRISPR-Cas9 , 2016, Cell.

[82]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation , 2014, Cell.

[83]  Timothy E. Reddy,et al.  Highly Specific Epigenome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 Repressors for Silencing of Distal Regulatory Elements , 2015, Nature Methods.

[84]  Deborah Y. Kwon,et al.  Locus-specific histone deacetylation using a synthetic CRISPR-Cas9-based HDAC , 2017, Nature Communications.

[85]  G. Church,et al.  Efficient construction of sequence-specific TAL effectors for modulating mammalian transcription. , 2011, Nature biotechnology.

[86]  M. Esteller,et al.  Aberrant epigenetic landscape in cancer: how cellular identity goes awry. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[87]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[88]  Suresh Ramakrishna,et al.  Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA , 2014, Genome research.

[89]  Demetrios A. Spandidos,et al.  Role of the CRISPR system in controlling gene transcription and monitoring cell fate , 2017, Molecular medicine reports.

[90]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[91]  Jaewoong Hwang,et al.  Rescue of high-specificity Cas9 variants using sgRNAs with matched 5’ nucleotides , 2017, Genome Biology.

[92]  Molly Gale,et al.  An easy and efficient inducible CRISPR/Cas9 platform with improved specificity for multiple gene targeting , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[93]  Yan Gao,et al.  Targeting Cdk11 in osteosarcoma cells using the CRISPR‐cas9 system , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[94]  Franklyn G. Prendergast,et al.  A Conserved α-Helical Motif Mediates the Interaction of Sp1-Like Transcriptional Repressors with the Corepressor mSin3A , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[95]  K. Lim,et al.  Genome Editing for the Understanding and Treatment of Inherited Cardiomyopathies , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[96]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  A Protein-Tagging System for Signal Amplification in Gene Expression and Fluorescence Imaging , 2014, Cell.

[97]  T. Lu,et al.  Tunable and Multifunctional Eukaryotic Transcription Factors Based on CRISPR/Cas , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[98]  Charles A. Gersbach,et al.  RNA-guided transcriptional silencing in vivo with S. aureus CRISPR-Cas9 repressors , 2018, Nature Communications.

[99]  Morgan L. Maeder,et al.  CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes , 2013, Nature Methods.

[100]  Fabien Nogué,et al.  Simple and Efficient Targeting of Multiple Genes Through CRISPR-Cas9 in Physcomitrella patens , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[101]  Maximilian Müller,et al.  Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR-Cas9 Systems Enable Specific Editing of the Human Genome. , 2016, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[102]  David S. Weiss,et al.  Cas9-mediated targeting of viral RNA in eukaryotic cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  Jörg Vogel,et al.  Processing-independent CRISPR RNAs limit natural transformation in Neisseria meningitidis. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[104]  R. Maehr,et al.  Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9 -histone demethylase fusion , 2015, Nature Methods.

[105]  Sruthi Mantri,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells , 2016, Nature.

[106]  Annick Harel-Bellan,et al.  A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[107]  J. L. Mateo,et al.  Refined sgRNA efficacy prediction improves large- and small-scale CRISPR–Cas9 applications , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[108]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[109]  Yanru Yin,et al.  The p16-specific reactivation and inhibition of cell migration through demethylation of CpG islands by engineered transcription factors. , 2012, Human gene therapy.

[110]  Feng Zhang,et al.  A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[111]  David W. Speicher,et al.  Molecular Determinants for Targeting Heterochromatin Protein 1-Mediated Gene Silencing: Direct Chromoshadow Domain–KAP-1 Corepressor Interaction Is Essential , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[112]  Jianzhong Su,et al.  Targeted DNA methylation in vivo using an engineered dCas9-MQ1 fusion protein , 2017, Nature Communications.

[113]  Yuting Tan,et al.  Genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 to create the HPFH genotype in HSPCs: An approach for treating sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[114]  J. Vogel,et al.  CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III , 2011, Nature.

[115]  David R. Liu,et al.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity , 2018, Nature.

[116]  Lluis Montoliu,et al.  Functional validation of mouse tyrosinase non-coding regulatory DNA elements by CRISPR–Cas9-mediated mutagenesis , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[117]  Pilar Blancafort,et al.  Activating PTEN Tumor Suppressor Expression with the CRISPR/dCas9 System , 2018, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[118]  Gang Bao,et al.  The Neisseria meningitidis CRISPR-Cas9 System Enables Specific Genome Editing in Mammalian Cells , 2016, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[119]  Feng Zhang,et al.  CRISPR-assisted editing of bacterial genomes , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[120]  J. Joung,et al.  Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[121]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells , 2014, Science.

[122]  Hao Ying,et al.  A Self-restricted CRISPR System to Reduce Off-target Effects. , 2016, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[123]  J. Joung,et al.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 variants with undetectable genome-wide off-targets , 2015, Nature.

[124]  Gang Bao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[125]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[126]  Sarah Nikiforow,et al.  Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Open Reading Frame 50/Rta Protein Activates the Entire Viral Lytic Cycle in the HH-B2 Primary Effusion Lymphoma Cell Line , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[127]  Isaac B. Hilton,et al.  Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation , 2016, Nature Methods.

[128]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[129]  Eunji Kim,et al.  In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni , 2017, Nature Communications.

[130]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR/Cas, the Immune System of Bacteria and Archaea , 2010, Science.

[131]  David S. Weiss,et al.  A CRISPR-CAS System Mediates Bacterial Innate Immune Evasion and Virulence , 2013, Nature.

[132]  Hemali P. Phatnani,et al.  Evaluating Synthetic Activation and Repression of Neuropsychiatric-Related Genes in hiPSC-Derived NPCs, Neurons, and Astrocytes , 2017, Stem cell reports.

[133]  Wei Chen,et al.  Prediction of CRISPR sgRNA Activity Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[134]  Max J. Kellner,et al.  RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13 , 2017, Science.

[135]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes , 2013, Cell.

[136]  Won-Bin Young,et al.  CRISPR/gRNA-directed synergistic activation mediator (SAM) induces specific, persistent and robust reactivation of the HIV-1 latent reservoirs , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[137]  D J Segal,et al.  Toward controlling gene expression at will: specific regulation of the erbB-2/HER-2 promoter by using polydactyl zinc finger proteins constructed from modular building blocks. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[138]  R. Terns,et al.  CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[139]  Samira Kiani,et al.  An enhanced CRISPR repressor for targeted mammalian gene regulation , 2018, Nature Methods.

[140]  Alessandro Romanel,et al.  A highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[141]  Robert Langer,et al.  Partial DNA-guided Cas9 enables genome editing with reduced off-target activity. , 2018, Nature chemical biology.

[142]  Peter C. Scacheri,et al.  Mutations in the noncoding genome , 2015, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[143]  Kevin T. Zhao,et al.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity , 2017, Science Advances.

[144]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote (‘enhancer’) and proximal (‘promoter’) positions. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[145]  R. Sun,et al.  A viral gene that activates lytic cycle expression of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[146]  Guohui Zhou,et al.  Establishing RNA virus resistance in plants by harnessing CRISPR immune system , 2018, Plant biotechnology journal.

[147]  David R. Liu,et al.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2016, Nature.

[148]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2014, Cell.

[149]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[150]  Frank Gannon,et al.  Epigenetic regulation in cancer progression , 2014, Cell & Bioscience.

[151]  Ben Berkhout,et al.  A Single H1 Promoter Can Drive Both Guide RNA and Endonuclease Expression in the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2018, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[152]  David Cyranoski CRISPR-baby scientist fails to satisfy critics , 2018, Nature.

[153]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Synergistic and tunable human gene activation by combinations of synthetic transcription factors , 2013, Nature Methods.

[154]  E. Hernández-Lemus,et al.  The Many Faces of Gene Regulation in Cancer: A Computational Oncogenomics Outlook , 2019, Genes.

[155]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[156]  Yuta Nihongaki,et al.  Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[157]  Gang Bao,et al.  A high-fidelity Cas9 mutant delivered as a ribonucleoprotein complex enables efficient gene editing in human haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[158]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[159]  Aaron T. L. Lun,et al.  Specificity of RNAi, LNA and CRISPRi as loss-of-function methods in transcriptional analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[160]  Ben Berkhout,et al.  RNA Polymerase II Activity of Type 3 Pol III Promoters , 2018, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[161]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[162]  Nadia Amrani,et al.  All-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and genome editing by Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 in vivo , 2018, Genome Biology.

[163]  Donna Dickenson,et al.  Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the ‘CRISPR babies’ experiment? , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[164]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[165]  Charles A. Gersbach,et al.  Light-Inducible Spatiotemporal Control of Gene Activation by Customizable Zinc Finger Transcription Factors , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[166]  C. Bennett,et al.  Synthetic CRISPR RNA-Cas9–guided genome editing in human cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[167]  Zhijian Wu,et al.  Effect of genome size on AAV vector packaging. , 2010, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[168]  Jin-Wu Nam,et al.  In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR–Cpf1 activity , 2016, Nature Methods.

[169]  P. Baeuerle,et al.  The p65 subunit is responsible for the strong transcription activating potential of NF‐kappa B. , 1991, The EMBO journal.