Knee Fix or Replace Trial (KFORT): a randomized controlled feasibility study.

AIMS The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, appropriately powered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing internal fracture fixation and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for distal femoral fractures in older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seven centres recruited patients into the study. Patients were eligible if they were greater than 65 years of age with a distal femoral fracture, and if the surgeon felt that they were suitable for either form of treatment. Outcome measures included the patients' willingness to participate, clinicians' willingness to recruit, rates of loss to follow-up, the ability to capture data, estimates of standard deviation to inform the sample size calculation, and the main determinants of cost. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimensional index (EQ-5D) at six months following injury. RESULTS Of 36 patients who met the inclusion criteria, five declined to participate and eight were not recruited, leaving 23 patients to be randomized. One patient withdrew before surgery. Of the remaining patients, five (23%) withdrew during the follow-up period and six (26%) died. A 100% response rate was achieved for the EQ-5D at each follow-up point, excluding one missing datapoint at baseline. In the DFR group, the mean cost of the implant outweighed the mean cost of many other items, including theatre time, length of stay, and readmissions. For a powered RCT, a total sample size of 1400 would be required with 234 centres recruiting over three years. At six months, the EQ-5D utility index was lower in the DFR group. CONCLUSION This study found that running a full-scale trial in this country would not be feasible. However, it may be feasible to undertake an international multicentre trial, and our findings provide some guidance about the power of such a study, the numbers required, and some challenges that should be anticipated and addressed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1408-1415.

[1]  T. Jennison,et al.  Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality. , 2019, Injury.

[2]  S. Lamb,et al.  Modelling and estimation of health-related quality of life after hip fracture , 2018, Bone & joint research.

[3]  B. Springer,et al.  Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J. Weinlein,et al.  Distal Femoral Replacement for Acute Distal Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[5]  I. Tarkin,et al.  Geriatric distal femur fracture: Are we underestimating the rate of local and systemic complications? , 2016, Injury.

[6]  J. McArthur,et al.  Distal femoral fractures: The need to review the standard of care. , 2015, Injury.

[7]  J. Achten,et al.  Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation--a prospective cohort study. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  J. Achten,et al.  Platelet-rich therapy in the treatment of patients with hip fractures: a single centre, parallel group, participant-blinded, randomised controlled trial , 2013, BMJ Open.

[9]  E. Bohm,et al.  The operative management of osteoporotic fractures of the knee: to fix or replace? , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[11]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  Michael J Gardner,et al.  Mortality After Distal Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  M. Orrell,et al.  EQ-5D as a quality of life measure in people with dementia and their carers: evidence and key issues. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[14]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. , 2006, Injury.

[15]  C. Robinson,et al.  Distal femoral fractures treated by hinged total knee replacement in elderly patients. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  Mohit Bhandari,et al.  Operative Treatment of Acute Distal Femur Fractures: Systematic Review of 2 Comparative Studies and 45 Case Series (1989 to 2005) , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[17]  Steven A. Julious,et al.  Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study , 2005 .

[18]  John E. Brazier,et al.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  E. Spangfort,et al.  The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.