A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French

Abstract Previous studies, mainly conducted on English running speech, have reported that (place) assimilation between words is usually incomplete, and have suggested that the perceptual processing of word forms altered by that assimilation depends on the extent to which phonemes at word boundary have undergone assimilation. The present research provides an acoustic–phonetic description of regressive voice assimilation in French and proposes an objective measure of “voicing degree” for stops in word-final position. This measure is the relative duration of voicing within the stop closure. It is shown to closely correlate with perceptual judgments of voicedness. Across two experiments, we show that voice assimilation in French is graded and asymmetrical in that voiceless stops assimilate to a larger extent than voiced stops do. It also appears that assimilation is slightly modulated by lexical factors such as potential ambiguity and phonological neighborhood. If a word belongs to a minimal pair for final stop voicing (e.g., rate /rat/ ‘spleen’ minimally contrasts with rade /rad/ ‘harbor’), assimilation strength tends to be weaker. The same trend applies to a word challenged by ‘dangerous’ phonological neighbors that only differ from it by their word-final consonant.

[1]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [∫] assimilation , 1995 .

[2]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[3]  M. Ernestus Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .

[4]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J Grainger,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Luce,et al.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon , 2004 .

[8]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[9]  R Kimchi,et al.  Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation , 2006 .

[11]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[12]  N. Umeda Consonant duration in American English , 1977 .

[13]  D. Gow Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[15]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing , 1985 .

[16]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[17]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[18]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation , 2001 .

[20]  R. Port,et al.  Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German , 1985 .

[21]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[22]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Studies of vowel and consonant reduction , 1992, ICSLP.

[24]  Monique Radeau,et al.  VoCoLex : une base de donnes lexicales sur les similarits phonologiques entre les mots franais , 2002 .

[25]  D. Whalen Infrequent words are longer in duration than frequent words. , 1991 .

[26]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Modelling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English , 1996 .

[27]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Frontiers of speech communication research , 1979 .

[28]  Marco Saerens,et al.  Acoustic Versus Contextual Factors in Stop Voicing Perception in Spontaneous French , 1989 .

[29]  Paul Kerswill,et al.  Electropalatography in the analysis of connected speech processes , 1989 .

[30]  R. Port,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German , 1989 .

[31]  B. Gordon Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. , 1985 .

[32]  D. Gow Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[33]  Claudia Kuzla Prosodically-conditioned variation in the realization of domain-final stops and voicing assimilation of domain-initial fricatives in German , 2003 .

[34]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[35]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[36]  Adamantios I. Gafos,et al.  Dynamics: the non-derivational alternative to modeling phonetics-phonology , 2003 .

[37]  J. Ohala The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[38]  Michael Jessen,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German , 1999 .

[39]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[40]  Francis Nolan,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation , 1992 .

[41]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[42]  Jongho Jun,et al.  Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation : an optimality theoretic approach , 1995 .

[43]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[44]  D. Whalen Further results on the duration of infrequent and frequent words. , 1992 .

[45]  Klaus J. Kohler,et al.  Segmental Reduction in Connected Speech in German: Phonological Facts and Phonetic Explanations , 1990 .

[46]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[47]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[48]  N. Umeda Vowel duration in American English. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  J. Casagrande,et al.  The sound system of French , 1984 .

[50]  Maurice Grammont,et al.  Traité de phonétique , 1939 .

[51]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[53]  L. Raphael Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  David W. Gow,et al.  Acoustic modification in English place assimilation , 1999 .

[55]  Natalie D. Snoeren,et al.  A Voice for the Voiceless: Voice Assimilation in French , 2003 .

[56]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .

[57]  D. Gow Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .

[58]  Bernard Tranel,et al.  The sounds of French: Orthography, pronunciation, and phonetic notation , 1987 .

[59]  D. Dinnsen,et al.  Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences , 1984 .

[60]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[61]  Danielle Duez,et al.  Restoration of deleted and assimilated consonant sequences in conversational French speech: effects of preceding and following context , 2001, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[62]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  C. Laeufer,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV , 1995 .

[64]  J. Segui,et al.  Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition: The Case of Suffixed Words , 1999 .

[65]  Fernand Carton,et al.  Introduction à la phonétique du français , 1974 .

[66]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  D. O'Shaughnessy A study of French vowel and consonant durations , 1981 .

[68]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Danielle Duez,et al.  On spontaneous French speech: aspects of the reduction and contextual assimilation of voiced stops , 1995 .

[70]  Joan L. Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[71]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  DISTINCTIVE FEATURES AND LARYNGEAL CONTROL , 1971 .

[72]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[73]  K. Kohler,et al.  Dimensions in the Perception of Fortis and Lenis Plosives , 1979, Phonetica.

[74]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Ambiguity Resolution and Spoken Word Recognition: Bridging the Gap , 2001 .