Business Artifacts for E-Business Interoperability

ABStrAct Traditional solutions to address interoperability issues are mainly process-centric so that consistent interactions among collaborating enterprises are ensured. These solutions examine interoperability from a technological perspective with focus on exchanging information messages between distributed and heterogeneous applications. However, interoperability from a business perspective has been overlooked in the past due to the complexity of reconciling diverse business strategies, organizational constraints, and IT infrastructures. Business interoperability denotes the ability of diverse enterprises to collaborate together to coproduce added-value products and services. In this chapter, a new line of thinking is promoted whereby interoperability is data-centric instead of process-centric. Business interoperability is dealt with by adopting business artifacts that are able to cross organizational boundaries, and by introducing a stack of three layers-strategy, service, and resource. Artifacts are self-contained business records that include attributes, states, and life cycles that reflect the changes in these states. The artifact concept not only describes a business entity, but also encompasses knowledge about what to process without explaining how to do it. The shift from processes to artifacts makes business interoperability " quite simple'' to deploy and renders collaboration easy to manage and analyze. The chapter also introduces several interaction patterns that regulate the exchange of artifacts between enterprises. The ideas and proposals in this chapter are discussed via a realistic case-study to demonstrate how business people can seamlessly manage their day-today activities and intuitively construct interoperable and sustainable collaborations at the business and technological levels.

[1]  Richard Hull,et al.  Business Artifacts: A Data-centric Approach to Modeling Business Operations and Processes , 2009, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[2]  Jane Hall,et al.  Semantic Interoperability for e-Business in the ISP Service Domain , 2008, ICE-B.

[3]  José Moyano-Fuentes,et al.  Inter-Organizational Information Systems and Strategic Alliances: Symbiosis or Competition? , 2006 .

[4]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  Adaptive Business Objects - A new Component Model for Business Integration , 2005, ICEIS.

[5]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutical research , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[6]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  Solving Semantic Interoperability Conflicts in Cross-Border E-Government Services , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[7]  Jianwen Su,et al.  Towards Formal Analysis of Artifact-Centric Business Process Models , 2007, BPM.

[8]  Maurice Hendrix,et al.  A pattern repository for establishing inter-organizational business processes , 2006 .

[9]  Zakaria Maamar,et al.  Developing Interoperable Business Processes Using Web Services and Policies , 2006, I-ESA.

[10]  Khalil Drira,et al.  A Model-Driven Approach for Synchronous Dynamic Collaborative E-Learning , 2004 .

[11]  Jean-Pierre Lorré,et al.  Interoperability through Model-based Generation: The Case of the Collaborative Information System (CIS) , 2006, I-ESA.

[12]  Zakaria Maamar,et al.  Towards a Unified Approach for Business Process Modeling Using Context-Based Artifacts and Web Services , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

[13]  Zakaria Maamar,et al.  A Framework for Modeling B2B Applications , 2008, 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (aina 2008).

[14]  Tran Cao Son,et al.  Semantic Web Services , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[15]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  GraphML Progress Report , 2001, GD.

[16]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  A New Paradigm for the Enactment and Dynamic Adaptation of Data-Driven Process Structures , 2008, CAiSE.

[17]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A Core Component-based Modelling Approach for Achieving e-Business Semantics Interoperability , 2008, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[18]  Richard Hull,et al.  Artifact-Centric Business Process Models: Brief Survey of Research Results and Challenges , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[19]  Richard Hull,et al.  Facilitating Workflow Interoperation Using Artifact-Centric Hubs , 2009, ICSOC/ServiceWave.

[20]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  On the Duality of Information-Centric and Activity-Centric Models of Business Processes , 2008, CAiSE.

[21]  Ali Arsanjani,et al.  Developing and Integrating ENTERPRISE COMPONENTS AND SERVICES , 2002 .

[22]  Yongsheng Ma,et al.  Towards Semantic Interoperability of Collaborative Engineering in Oil Production Industry , 2009, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[23]  Geert Poels,et al.  Using the REA Ontology to Create Interoperability between E-Collaboration Modeling Standards , 2009, CAiSE.

[24]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  The Connection, Communication, Consolidation, Collaboration Interoperability Framework (C4IF) For Information Systems Interoperability , 2006, Int. J. Interoperability Bus. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Nuno Silva,et al.  E-Business Interoperability Through Ontology Semantic Mapping , 2003, PRO-VE.

[26]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Choice, interoperability, and conformance in interaction protocols and service choreographies , 2009, AAMAS.

[27]  Peng Liang,et al.  The interoperability between different e-business specifications , 2005, International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'05) - Volume II.

[28]  Alin Deutsch,et al.  Automatic verification of data-centric business processes , 2009, ICDT '09.

[29]  Naixiao Zhu,et al.  Research on Open Innovation in China: Focus on Intellectual Property Rights and their Operation in Chinese Enterprises , 2012, Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag..

[30]  Anil Nigam,et al.  Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification , 2003, IBM Syst. J..