Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?

In visual working memory tasks, memory for an item is enhanced if participants are told that the item is relatively more valuable than others presented within the same trial. Experiment 1 explored whether these probe value boosts (termed prioritization effects in previous literature) are affected by probe frequency (i.e., how often the more valuable item is tested). Participants were presented with four colored shapes sequentially and asked to recall the color of one probed item following a delay. They were informed that the first item was more valuable (differential probe value) or as valuable as the other items (equal probe value), and that this item would be tested more frequently (differential probe frequency) or as frequently (equal probe frequency) as the other items. Probe value and probe frequency boosts were observed at the first position, though both were accompanied by costs to other items. Probe value and probe frequency boosts were additive, suggesting the manipulations yield independent effects. Further supporting this, experiment 2 revealed that probe frequency boosts are not reliant on executive resources, directly contrasting with previous findings regarding probe value. Taken together, these outcomes suggest there may be several ways in which attention can be directed in working memory.

[1]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[2]  L Hasher,et al.  The processing of frequency of occurrence information by adults. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[3]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research : Practical relevance and new developments” , 2016 .

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[7]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Attention to Information in Working Memory , 2012 .

[8]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Turatto,et al.  Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory , 2015, Vision Research.

[10]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Does Not Show Equivalence , 2015 .

[14]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Explicit and implicit remembering: When is learning preserved in amnesia? , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  Valérie Camos,et al.  Working Memory: Loss and reconstruction , 2014 .

[17]  Gaia Scerif,et al.  Orienting attention within visual short-term memory: development and mechanisms. , 2014, Child development.

[18]  Evie Vergauwe,et al.  Attentional refreshing of information in working memory: Increased immediate accessibility of just-refreshed representations☆ , 2017 .

[19]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: Decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Evidence against decay in verbal working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. , 2002 .

[26]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[28]  C. Olivers,et al.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Nicholas E. Myers,et al.  Benefits of Flexible Prioritization in Working Memory Can Arise Without Costs , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The Processing of Frequency Information: An Automatic Mechanism?. , 1977 .

[31]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Ed D J Berry,et al.  The Limits of Visual Working Memory in Children: Exploring Prioritization and Recency Effects With Sequential Presentation , 2017, Developmental psychology.

[33]  S. Pickering,et al.  Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[34]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[36]  A. Schubö,et al.  The Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory: Protection of Focused Representations and Its Individual Variation , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  Mengyuan Gong,et al.  Learned reward association improves visual working memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[41]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Dan J. Woltz,et al.  An investigation of the role of working memory in procedural skill acquisition. , 1988 .

[43]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2018 .

[44]  Gaia Scerif,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Attentional Control Constrains Visual Short- Term Memory: Insights from Developmental and Individual Differences , 2022 .