Specialization and evolutionary branching within migratory populations

Understanding the mechanisms that drive specialization and speciation within initially homogeneous populations is a fundamental challenge for evolutionary theory. It is an issue of relevance for significant open questions in biology concerning the generation and maintenance of biodiversity, the origins of reciprocal cooperation, and the efficient division of labor in social or colonial organisms. Several mathematical frameworks have been developed to address this question and models based on evolutionary game theory or the adaptive dynamics of phenotypic mutation have demonstrated the emergence of polymorphic, specialized populations. Here we focus on a ubiquitous biological phenomenon, migration. Individuals in our model may evolve the capacity to detect and follow an environmental cue that indicates a preferred migration route. The strategy space is defined by the level of investment in acquiring personal information about this route or the alternative tendency to follow the direction choice of others. The result is a relation between the migratory process and a game theoretic dynamic that is generally applicable to situations where information may be considered a public good. Through the use of an approximation of social interactions, we demonstrate the emergence of a stable, polymorphic population consisting of an uninformed subpopulation that is dependent upon a specialized group of leaders. The branching process is classified using the techniques of adaptive dynamics.

[1]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[3]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[4]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[6]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[7]  D. Grünbaum Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[10]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  C. Pomilla,et al.  Against the current: an inter-oceanic whale migration event , 2005, Biology Letters.

[12]  C. Roberts Ecological advice for the global fisher crisis. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence , 1984, Springer Series in Synergetics.

[14]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[15]  David B. Fogel,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice , 1997, Complex.

[16]  Colin Torney,et al.  Context-dependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Tamm Bird orientation: Single homing pigeons compared with small flocks , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[19]  Craig W. Steele,et al.  Effects of group size on the responsiveness of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio (Hamilton Buchanan), to alanine, a chemical attractant , 1991 .

[20]  I. Eshel Evolutionary and continuous stability , 1983 .

[21]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[22]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Complex adaptive systems: Exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable , 2002 .

[23]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[24]  E A Codling,et al.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement. , 2007, Ecology.

[25]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[26]  S. Strogatz From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators , 2000 .

[27]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. L. Gould Animal navigation , 2004, Current Biology.

[29]  F. B. Christiansen On Conditions for Evolutionary Stability for a Continuously Varying Character , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[30]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[31]  D. Roze,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of multicellularity , 2001, Heredity.

[32]  H. Risken Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[33]  R. Sibly,et al.  Producers and scroungers: A general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  C. Hauert,et al.  The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors , 2004, Science.

[35]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[36]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[37]  U. Sommer,et al.  Long range vertical migration of Volvox in tropical Lake Cahora Bassa (Mozambique) , 1986 .

[38]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[39]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.