Gap Dynamics and Structure of Two Old-Growth Beech Forest Remnants in Slovenia

Context Due to a long history of intensive forest exploitation, few European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) old-growth forests have been preserved in Europe. Material and Methods We studied two beech forest reserves in southern Slovenia. We examined the structural characteristics of the two forest reserves based on data from sample plots and complete inventory obtained from four previous forest management plans. To gain a better understanding of disturbance dynamics, we used aerial imagery to study the characteristics of canopy gaps over an 11-year period in the Kopa forest reserve and a 20-year period in the Gorjanci forest reserve. Results The results suggest that these forests are structurally heterogeneous over small spatial scales. Gap size analysis showed that gaps smaller than 500 m2 are the dominant driving force of stand development. The percentage of forest area in canopy gaps ranged from 3.2 to 4.5% in the Kopa forest reserve and from 9.1 to 10.6% in the Gorjanci forest reserve. These forests exhibit relatively high annual rates of coverage by newly established (0.15 and 0.25%) and closed (0.08 and 0.16%) canopy gaps. New gap formation is dependant on senescent trees located throughout the reserve. Conclusion We conclude that these stands are not even-sized, but rather unevenly structured. This is due to the fact that the disturbance regime is characterized by low intensity, small-scale disturbances.

[1]  Jerzy Szwagrzyk,et al.  Spatial patterns of trees in natural forests of East‐Central Europe , 1993 .

[2]  Jean-Yves Pontailler,et al.  Storms drive successional dynamics in natural forests: a case study in Fontainebleau forest (France) , 1997 .

[3]  K. Lertzman.  Patterns of gap-phase replacement in a subalpine, old-growth forest , 1992 .

[4]  M. Saniga,et al.  Modelling the risks of natural stand closure release with ageing in pure beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) stands , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[5]  Jurij Diaci.  RAZVOJ INICIALNE FAZE NA VETROLOMNI POVRŠINI V PRAGOZDNEM OSTANKU RAVNA GORA , 2004 .

[6]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Top height definition and its effect on site index determination in thinned and unthinned loblolly pine plantations , 2002 .

[7]  H. Ellenberg,et al.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen , 1984 .

[8]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Marked Point Processes in Forest Statistics , 1992, Forest Science.

[9]  A. Zingg,et al.  Structure of virgin and managed beech forests in Uholka (Ukraine) and Sihlwald (Switzerland): a comparative study , 2005 .

[10]  H. Thompson.  Distribution of Distance to Nth Neighbour in a Population of Randomly Distributed Individuals , 1956 .

[11]  M. Saniga,et al.  Canopy gaps in an old-growth fir-beech forest remnant of Western Carpathians , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[12]  T. Nagel,et al.  Gap disturbance regime in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in the Dinaric Mountains, Bosnia-Herzegovina , 2008 .

[13]  A. Di Filippo,et al.  Structure , dynamics and dendroecology of an old-growth Fagus forest in the Apennines , 2005 .

[14]  J. Diaci,et al.  Gap disturbance patterns of a Fagus sylvatica virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia , 2005 .

[15]  James R. Runkle,et al.  PATTERNS OF DISTURBANCE IN SOME OLD-GROWTH MESIC FORESTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' , 1982 .

[16]  T. Vrška,et al.  Local variability of stand structural features in beech dominated natural forests of Central Europe: Implications for sampling , 2010 .

[17]  J. Battles,et al.  GAP DYNAMICS FOLLOWING FOREST DECLINE: A CASE STUDY OF RED SPRUCE FORESTS , 2000 .

[18]  Jens Emborg,et al.  Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark , 1998 .

[19]  Arne Pommerening,et al.  Approaches to quantifying forest structures , 2002 .

[20]  S. Yamamoto,et al.  Canopy gap formation and replacement pattern of major tree species among developmental stages of beech (Fagus crenata) stands, Japan , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[21]  W. Härdtle,et al.  Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany) , 2005 .

[22]  Craig G. Lorimer,et al.  A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests , 1989 .

[23]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[24]  E. Baltsavias,et al.  Semi-automatic classification of tree species in different forest ecosystems by spectral and geometric variables derived from Airborne Digital Sensor (ADS40) and RC30 data , 2011 .

[25]  H. Ellenberg.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[26]  T. Bailey.  Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[27]  T. Vrška,et al.  Natural Gap Dynamics in a Central European Mixed Beech-Spruce-Fir Old-Growth Forest , 2009 .

[28]  A. Granier,et al.  Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) branches show acclimation of xylem anatomy and hydraulic properties to increased light after thinning , 2002 .

[29]  P. Meyer,et al.  Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves , 2005 .

[30]  A. Nielsen,et al.  The forest cycle of Suserup Skov - revisited and revised , 2007 .