The potential of mean force of water and ions in aquaporin channels investigated by the 3D-RISM method

Abstract The three dimensional (3D) distributions of sodium, chloride, and hydronium ions along with water, in two aquaporin channels, AQP1 and GlpF, were calculated using the three dimensional reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) theory. It was found from the potential of mean force (PMF) obtained from the 3D-distribution that water inside the both channels is slightly more stable than bulk, and that PMF does not have high barriers for a water molecule to cross. The results are completely in harmony with the experimental observations, while they are in accord with none of the molecular simulation studies. All the ions studied are hard to permeate through either of the channels. However, the reasons why the permeability is so low are different depending on the channels and the ions. In the AQP1 channel, the cations, or Na + and H 3 O + , are largely excluded from the channel essentially by the electrostatic repulsion due to the positively charged residues, while the Cl − ion is blocked by a high steric barrier at the selective filter (SF) region. In the GlpF, the PMFs of Na + and H 3 O + inside the channel are mostly positive, and they have three large barriers to cross, which may be preventing the ions from permeation. On the other hand, the PMF of Cl − is largely negative, but it has wide and deep well which likely prevents the ion from permeating through the channel by “trapping” mechanism.

[1]  Peter Agre,et al.  Appearance of Water Channels in Xenopus Oocytes Expressing Red Cell CHIP28 Protein , 1992, Science.

[2]  Peter C. Jordan,et al.  Water and ion permeation in bAQP1 and GlpF channels: a kinetic Monte Carlo study. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[3]  W. Boron,et al.  Evidence that aquaporin 1 is a major pathway for CO2 transport across the human erythrocyte membrane , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  K. Schulten,et al.  The mechanism of proton exclusion in aquaporin channels , 2004, Proteins.

[5]  C H van Os,et al.  Aquaporins and ion conductance. , 1997, Science.

[6]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Potential of Mean Force between Two Molecular Ions in a Polar Molecular Solvent: A Study by the Three-Dimensional Reference Interaction Site Model , 1999 .

[7]  Norio Yoshida,et al.  Selective ion-binding by protein probed with the 3D-RISM theory. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Charge delocalization in proton channels, I: the aquaporin channels and proton blockage. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Norio Yoshida,et al.  Selective ion binding by protein probed with the statistical mechanical integral equation theory. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  K. Schulten,et al.  Electrostatic tuning of permeation and selectivity in aquaporin water channels. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[11]  K. Schulten,et al.  Control of the Selectivity of the Aquaporin Water Channel Family by Global Orientational Tuning , 2002, Science.

[12]  N. Yoshida,et al.  On the proton exclusion of aquaporins: a statistical mechanics study. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Potentials of mean force of simple ions in ambient aqueous solution. I. Three-dimensional reference interaction site model approach , 2000 .

[14]  G. Voth,et al.  Origins of proton transport behavior from selectivity domain mutations of the aquaporin-1 channel. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  An improved multistate empirical valence bond model for aqueous proton solvation and transport. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[17]  P. Pohl,et al.  Proton exclusion by an aquaglyceroprotein: a voltage clamp study , 2005, Biology of the cell.

[18]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Water molecules in a protein cavity detected by a statistical-mechanical theory. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  F. Hirata,et al.  Theoretical study of volume changes accompanying xenon-lysozyme binding: implications for the molecular mechanism of pressure reversal of anesthesia. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[20]  E. Tajkhorshid,et al.  Molecular basis of proton blockage in aquaporins. , 2004, Structure.

[21]  P. Agre,et al.  Reconstitution of functional water channels in liposomes containing purified red cell CHIP28 protein. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[22]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Theoretical study of the partial molar volume change associated with the pressure‐induced structural transition of ubiquitin , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  E. Beitz,et al.  Aquaporins with selectivity for unconventional permeants , 2007, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[24]  F. Hirata,et al.  Three-dimensional density profiles of water in contact with a solute of arbitrary shape: a RISM approach , 1998 .

[25]  A. Warshel,et al.  On the origin of the electrostatic barrier for proton transport in aquaporin , 2004, FEBS letters.

[26]  Norio Yoshida,et al.  The statistical-mechanics study for the distribution of water molecules in aquaporin , 2007 .

[27]  Benoît Roux,et al.  An Integral Equation To Describe the Solvation of Polar Molecules in Liquid Water , 1997 .

[28]  Gregory A. Voth,et al.  The computer simulation of proton transport in water , 1999 .

[29]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Theoretical study of the cosolvent effect on the partial molar volume change of staphylococcal nuclease associated with pressure denaturation. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[30]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  The barrier for proton transport in aquaporins as a challenge for electrostatic models: The role of protein relaxation in mutational calculations , 2006, Proteins.

[31]  Bong-Gyoon Han,et al.  Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel , 2001, Nature.

[32]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ion-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations , 1990 .

[33]  L Laaksonen,et al.  A graphics program for the analysis and display of molecular dynamics trajectories. , 1992, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests , 2001, Science.

[35]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Partial molar volume of proteins studied by the three-dimensional reference interaction site model theory. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[37]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Energy component analysis for dilute aqueous solutions of lithium(1+), sodium(1+), fluoride(1-), and chloride(1-) ions , 1984 .

[38]  P. Gane,et al.  Role of RhAG and AQP1 in NH3 and CO2 gas transport in red cell ghosts: a stopped-flow analysis. , 2006, Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine.

[39]  Helmut Grubmüller,et al.  The dynamics and energetics of water permeation and proton exclusion in aquaporins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  The mechanism of proton exclusion in the aquaporin-1 water channel. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Jochen S. Hub,et al.  Mechanism of selectivity in aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Andreas Engel,et al.  Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1 , 2000, Nature.

[43]  A. Verkman,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Permeability of Aquaporin-1 Measured in Erythrocytes and Lung of Aquaporin-1 Null Mice and in Reconstituted Proteoliposomes* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  Binghua Wu,et al.  Point mutations in the aromatic/arginine region in aquaporin 1 allow passage of urea, glycerol, ammonia, and protons. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Andreas Engel,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of aquaporin-1 , 1997, Nature.

[46]  Jessica M J Swanson,et al.  Proton solvation and transport in aqueous and biomolecular systems: insights from computer simulations. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[47]  Ion exclusion mechanism in aquaporin at an atomistic level , 2007, Proteins.

[48]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Molecular Theory of Solvation , 2004 .

[49]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Three-dimensional distribution function theory for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites and affinities: application to the binding of noble gases to hen egg-white lysozyme in aqueous solution. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  Fumio Hirata,et al.  Locating missing water molecules in protein cavities by the three‐dimensional reference interaction site model theory of molecular solvation , 2006, Proteins.

[51]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Structural determinants of proton blockage in aquaporins. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Thomas P. Jahn,et al.  NH3 and NH4+ permeability in aquaporin-expressing Xenopus oocytes , 2005, Pflügers Archiv.

[53]  N. Agmon,et al.  The Grotthuss mechanism , 1995 .

[54]  D. Fu,et al.  Crystal Structure of AqpZ Tetramer Reveals Two Distinct Arg-189 Conformations Associated with Water Permeation through the Narrowest Constriction of the Water-conducting Channel* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  A. Warshel,et al.  What really prevents proton transport through aquaporin? Charge self-energy versus proton wire proposals. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[56]  A. Laaksonen,et al.  Visualization of solvation structures in liquid mixtures. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.