Profiling Dose-Dependent Activation of p53-Mediated Signaling Pathways by Chemicals with Distinct Mechanisms of DNA Damage

As part of a larger effort to provide proof-of-concept in vitro-only risk assessments, we have developed a suite of high-throughput assays for key readouts in the p53 DNA damage response toxicity pathway: double-strand break DNA damage (p-H2AX), permanent chromosomal damage (micronuclei), p53 activation, p53 transcriptional activity, and cell fate (cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, micronuclei). Dose-response studies were performed with these protein and cell fate assays, together with whole genome transcriptomics, for three prototype chemicals: etoposide, quercetin, and methyl methanesulfonate. Data were collected in a human cell line expressing wild-type p53 (HT1080) and results were confirmed in a second p53 competent cell line (HCT 116). At chemical concentrations causing similar increases in p53 protein expression, p53-mediated protein expression and cellular processes showed substantial chemical-specific differences. These chemical-specific differences in the p53 transcriptional response appear to be determined by augmentation of the p53 response by co-regulators. More importantly, dose-response data for each of the chemicals indicate that the p53 transcriptional response does not prevent micronuclei induction at low concentrations. In fact, the no observed effect levels and benchmark doses for micronuclei induction were less than or equal to those for p53-mediated gene transcription regardless of the test chemical, indicating that p53's post-translational responses may be more important than transcriptional activation in the response to low dose DNA damage. This effort demonstrates the process of defining key assays required for a pathway-based, in vitro-only risk assessment, using the p53-mediated DNA damage response pathway as a prototype.

[1]  Yoichi Taya,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation of p53 Alleviates Inhibition by MDM2 , 1997, Cell.

[2]  S. Ebeler,et al.  Flavonoid effects on DNA oxidation at low concentrations relevant to physiological levels. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  J A Swenberg,et al.  Dose-response relationships for carcinogens. , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[4]  Goberdhan P Dimri,et al.  The Notch Regulator MAML1 Interacts with p53 and Functions as a Coactivator* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Jian Yu,et al.  PUMA, a potent killer with or without p53 , 2008, Oncogene.

[6]  C. M. Eischen,et al.  Mdm2 affects genome stability independent of p53. , 2009, Cancer research.

[7]  D. Gordenin,et al.  Alkylation Base Damage Is Converted into Repairable Double-Strand Breaks and Complex Intermediates in G2 Cells Lacking AP Endonuclease , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Defining New Risk Assessment Approaches Based on Perturbation of Intracellular Toxicity Pathways , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Galit Lahav,et al.  Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Ivan Sadowski,et al.  Identification of the mismatch repair genes PMS2 and MLH1 as p53 target genes by using serial analysis of binding elements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  STAT-1 Interacts with p53 to Enhance DNA Damage-induced Apoptosis* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Homologous recombination protects mammalian cells from replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks arising in response to methyl methanesulfonate. , 2010, DNA repair.

[13]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. , 2003, Genes & development.

[14]  Jeremy E. Purvis,et al.  p53 Dynamics Control Cell Fate , 2012, Science.

[15]  S. Cawley,et al.  Unbiased Mapping of Transcription Factor Binding Sites along Human Chromosomes 21 and 22 Points to Widespread Regulation of Noncoding RNAs , 2004, Cell.

[16]  C. Anderson,et al.  Posttranslational modification of p53: cooperative integrators of function. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[17]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Quantitative Detection of 125IdU-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks with γ-H2AX Antibody , 2002 .

[18]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  N. Osheroff,et al.  Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  D. Skibinski,et al.  Non-linear dose-response of DNA-reactive genotoxins: recommendations for data analysis. , 2009, Mutation research.

[21]  M. Wyatt,et al.  Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[22]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  Biokinetic Modeling and in Vitro–in Vivo Extrapolations , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[23]  S. Elledge,et al.  The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases , 1993, Cell.

[24]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Quantitative detection of (125)IdU-induced DNA double-strand breaks with gamma-H2AX antibody. , 2002, Radiation research.

[25]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[26]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[27]  E. May,et al.  Identification of a novel p53-dependent activation pathway of STAT1 by antitumour genotoxic agents , 2008, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[28]  David M. Reif,et al.  Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[29]  S. Mateos,et al.  Topoisomerase II inhibition and high yield of endoreduplication induced by the flavonoids luteolin and quercetin. , 2006, Mutagenesis.

[30]  G. Jenkins,et al.  Mechanistic influences for mutation induction curves after exposure to DNA-reactive carcinogens. , 2007, Cancer research.

[31]  A. Ashworth,et al.  p53 modulates homologous recombination by transcriptional regulation of the RAD51 gene , 2006, EMBO reports.

[32]  Giulia Piaggio,et al.  Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  J. Manfredi,et al.  A conserved intronic response element mediates direct p53-dependent transcriptional activation of both the human and murine bax genes , 2002, Oncogene.

[34]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies , 2011, Genome Biology.

[35]  P. Dey,et al.  Micronucleus and its applications , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[36]  Uri Alon,et al.  Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[37]  J. Bemis,et al.  High content flow cytometric micronucleus scoring method is applicable to attachment cell lines , 2009, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[38]  John Calvin Reed,et al.  Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene , 1995, Cell.

[39]  E. Calabrese,et al.  Evidence for hormesis in mutagenicity dose-response relationships. , 2011, Mutation research.

[40]  M. Kirsch‐Volders,et al.  Potential thresholds for genotoxic effects by micronucleus scoring. , 2011, Mutagenesis.

[41]  V. Yamazaki,et al.  A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage , 2000, Current Biology.

[42]  M. Oren,et al.  mdm2 expression is induced by wild type p53 activity. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[43]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  A mechanistic redefinition of adverse effects - a key step in the toxicity testing paradigm shift. , 2010, ALTEX.

[44]  J. Trent,et al.  WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression , 1993, Cell.

[45]  Fagen Zhang,et al.  Dose-response and operational thresholds/NOAELs for in vitro mutagenic effects from DNA-reactive mutagens, MMS and MNU. , 2009, Mutation research.

[46]  D. Meek,et al.  Serine 15 phosphorylation stimulates p53 transactivation but does not directly influence interaction with HDM2 , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[47]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[48]  Adam D. Thomas,et al.  Influence of DNA Repair on Nonlinear Dose-Responses for Mutation , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[49]  D Saur,et al.  Cross talk between stimulated NF-κB and the tumor suppressor p53 , 2010, Oncogene.

[50]  R. W. Lutz,et al.  Statistical model to estimate a threshold dose and its confidence limits for the analysis of sublinear dose-response relationships, exemplified for mutagenicity data. , 2009, Mutation research.

[51]  F. Murray-Zmijewski,et al.  A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[52]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  p53AIP1, a Potential Mediator of p53-Dependent Apoptosis, and Its Regulation by Ser-46-Phosphorylated p53 , 2000, Cell.

[53]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?". , 2011, ALTEX.

[54]  Sylvain V Costes,et al.  Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Yang Xu,et al.  Regulation of p53 responses by post-translational modifications , 2003, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[56]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[57]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Computational Systems Biology and Dose-Response Modeling in Relation to New Directions in Toxicity Testing , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[58]  Lincoln Stein,et al.  Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[59]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[60]  S. Lowe,et al.  The atypical E2F family member E2F7 couples the p53 and RB pathways during cellular senescence. , 2012, Genes & development.

[61]  Lutz Müller,et al.  In vivo studies in the mouse to define a threshold for the genotoxicity of EMS and ENU. , 2009, Mutation research.

[62]  Hendrik G. Stunnenberg,et al.  Role of p53 Serine 46 in p53 Target Gene Regulation , 2011, PloS one.

[63]  F. Nesslany,et al.  Study of oxidative DNA damage in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells by use of the thymidine kinase gene-mutation assay and the in vitro modified comet assay: determination of No-Observed-Genotoxic-Effect-Levels. , 2011, Mutation research.

[64]  C. Prives,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by p53. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[65]  Galit Lahav,et al.  Basal Dynamics of p53 Reveal Transcriptionally Attenuated Pulses in Cycling Cells , 2010, Cell.

[66]  David J. Chen,et al.  Evidence for the direct binding of phosphorylated p53 to sites of DNA breaks in vivo. , 2005, Cancer research.

[67]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Large-Scale Transcriptional Activity in Chromosomes 21 and 22 , 2002, Science.

[68]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  p53 mutations in human cancers. , 1991, Science.

[69]  Bruce C Allen,et al.  BMDExpress: a software tool for the benchmark dose analyses of genomic data , 2007, BMC Genomics.