Dosimetric Impact of a New Computational Voxel Phantom Series for the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: Methodological Improvements and Organ Dose Response Functions

Owing to recent advances in computational dosimetry tools, an update is warranted for the dosimetry system for atomic bomb survivors that was established by the Joint U.S.Japan Working Group on the Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Dosimetry in 2002 (DS02). The DS02 system, and its predecessor, DS86, at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), are based on adjoint Monte Carlo particle transport simulations coupled with stylized computational human phantoms. In our previous studies, we developed the J45 series of computational voxel phantoms representative of 1945 Japanese adults, children and pregnant females. The dosimetric impact of replacing the DS02/DS86 stylized phantoms by the J45 phantom series was also discussed through computation of organ doses for several idealized exposure scenarios. In the current study, we investigated the possible impact of introducing not only the J45 phantom series but also various methodological upgrades to the DS02 dosimetry system. For this purpose, we calculated organ doses in adults for 12 representative exposure scenarios having realistic particle energy and angular fluence, using different combinations of phantoms and dose calculation methods. Those doses were compared with survivor organ doses given by the DS02 system. It was found that the anatomical improvement in the J45 phantom series is the most important factor leading to potential changes in survivor organ doses. However, methodological upgrades, such as replacement of the adjoint Monte Carlo simulation with kerma approximation by the forward Monte Carlo simulation with secondary electron transport, can also improve the accuracy of organ doses by up to several percent.In addition, this study established a series of response functions, which allows for the rapid conversion of the unidirectional quasi-monoenergetic photon and neutron fluences from the existing DS02 system to organ doses within the J45 adult phantoms. The overall impact of introducing the response functions in the dosimetry system is not so significant, less than 10% in most cases, except for organs in which the calculation method or definition was changed, e.g., colon and bone marrow. This system of response functions can be implemented within a revision to the DS02 dosimetry system and used for future updates to organ doses within the Life Span Study of the atomic bomb survivors.

[1]  Yoshihito Namito,et al.  The EGS5 code system , 2005 .

[2]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from neutron irradiation , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–2009 , 2017, Radiation Research.

[4]  George D. Kerr,et al.  Reassessment of the atomic bomb radiation dosimetry for Hiroshima and Nagasaki : dosimetry system 2002 : report of the joint US-Japan working group , 2005 .

[5]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Dosimetric Impact of a New Computational Voxel Phantom Series for the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: Pregnant Females. , 2019, Radiation research.

[6]  K. Shibata,et al.  JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[7]  W. Rühm,et al.  41Ca in Tooth Enamel. Part II: A Means for Retrospective Biological Neutron Dosimetry in Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2010, Radiation research.

[8]  Takuya Furuta,et al.  Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02 , 2018 .

[9]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Skin Cancer Incidence among Atomic Bomb Survivors from 1958 to 1996 , 2014, Radiation research.

[10]  Stephen D Egbert The 2002 dosimetry system (DS02) and available fluences for organ dose calculations. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  K. Kodama,et al.  DS02R1: Improvements to Atomic Bomb Survivors’ Input Data and Implementation of Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02) and Resulting Changes in Estimated Doses , 2017, Health physics.

[12]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation—an update , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Sachiyo Funamoto,et al.  Dosimetric Impact of a New Computational Voxel Phantom Series for the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: Children and Adults , 2019, Radiation Research.

[14]  Harry M Cullings,et al.  Assessing the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Neutrons across Organs of Varying Depth among the Atomic Bomb Survivors. , 2019, Radiation research.

[15]  W. Rühm,et al.  41Ca in Tooth Enamel. Part I: A Biological Signature of Neutron Exposure in Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2010, Radiation research.

[16]  Eizo Tajima,et al.  US-Japan Joint Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Radiation Dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Final Report) , 1987 .

[17]  C H Kim,et al.  New mesh-type phantoms and their dosimetric applications, including emergencies , 2018, Annals of the ICRP.

[18]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Histologic characteristics of skin cancer in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Background incidence and radiation effects , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[19]  Daniel Lodwick,et al.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.