Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use

The implementation of new information technology (IT) often aims at transforming work practices. The information systems (IS) literature has detailed numerous cases of reproduction or changes of practice associated with IT use. The literature has also drawn from the practice and structurationist perspectives to suggest that changes in practice are related to changes in organizations. The micro-level issue of how practices change with IT use, however, has so far remained under-explored. This paper investigates this issue and analyzes what makes agents transform how they work with IT and how these transformations may be shared among members of the same work group. The conceptual lens proposed in this paper builds on the emerging literature in IS on the relationships between action and cognition, and introduces the notion of social representations to the IS field in order to clarify these relationships. The adopted conceptual lens helps us to examine a longitudinal case study of the implementation and use of an intranet system in an occupational network. The analysis suggests that practices are reproduced with IT use when agents experience a sustained consonance between actions, practices and representations. Conversely, when agents undergo dissonance between actions, practices and representations, they gradually adapt their practices and representations to reestablish consonance.

[1]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork: invisible aid or technical hindrance? , 1997 .

[2]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Force of Habit and Information Systems Usage: Theory and Initial Validation , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[9]  P. Bourdieu.  In Other Words , 1990 .

[10]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[11]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[12]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[13]  D. Jodelet.  Les représentations sociales , 2003 .

[14]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[16]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[19]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Technology and Organizations , 1990 .

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  IT and changing professional identity: micro-studies and macro-theory , 1998 .

[22]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[24]  M. Miles.  Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[25]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Participation in groupware-mediated communities of practice: a socio-political analysis of knowledge working , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[26]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Evolving the notes: organizational change around groupware technology , 1997 .

[30]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[32]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[33]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[35]  P. Bourdieu.  Le sens pratique , 1976 .

[36]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[37]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[41]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[42]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[43]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[44]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[45]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[46]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[47]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[48]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[50]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[51]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Boundless and bounded interactions in the knowledge work process: the role of groupware technologies , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[53]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[54]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[55]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[56]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[57]  Susan J. Winter,et al.  The Role of IT in the Transformation of Work: A Comparison of Post-Industrial, Industrial, and Proto-Industrial Organization , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  C. Geertz,et al.  Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics , 2000 .

[59]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[60]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Special Issue on Redefining the Organizational Roles of Information Technology in the Information Age , 2003, MIS Q..

[61]  Alberto Greco.  The concept of representation in psychology , 1995 .

[62]  S. Moscovici.  La psychanalyse, son image et son public , 2004 .

[63]  BoudreauMarie-Claude,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1999 .

[64]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[65]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[66]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli.  GETTING IN TOUCH WITH OUR FEELINGS TOWARDS TECHNOLOGY. , 2004 .

[67]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..