Variability of the Boundary Layer Over an Urban Continental Site Based on 10 Years of Active Remote Sensing Observations in Warsaw

Atmospheric boundary layer height (ABLH) was observed by the CHM15k ceilometer (January 2008 to October 2013) and the PollyXT lidar (July 2013 to December 2018) over the European Aerosol Research LIdar NETwork to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET) site at the Remote Sensing Laboratory (RS-Lab) in Warsaw, Poland. Out of a maximum number of 4017 observational days within this period, a subset of quasi-continuous measurements conducted with these instruments at the same wavelength (1064 nm) was carefully chosen. This provided a data sample of 1841 diurnal cycle ABLH observations. The ABLHs were derived from ceilometer and lidar signals using the wavelet covariance transform method (WCT), gradient method (GDT), and standard deviation method (STD). For comparisons, the rawinsondes of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO 12374 site in Legionowo, 25 km distance to the RS-Lab) were used. The ABLHs derived from rawinsondes by the skew-T-log-p method and the bulk Richardson (bulk-Ri) method had a linear correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9 and standard deviation (SD) of 0.32 km. A comparison of the ABLHs obtained for different methods and instruments indicated a relatively good agreement. The ABLHs estimated from the rawinsondes with the bulk-Ri method had the highest correlations, R2 of 0.80 and 0.70 with the ABLHs determined using the WCT method on ceilometer and lidar signals, respectively. The three methods applied to the simultaneous, collocated lidar, and ceilometer observations (July to October 2013) showed good agreement, especially for the WCT method (R2 of 0.94, SD of 0.19 km). A scaling threshold-based algorithm was proposed to homogenize ceilometer and lidar datasets, which were applied on the lidar data, and significantly improved the coherence of the results (R2 of 0.98, SD of 0.11 km). The difference of ABLH between clear-sky and cloudy conditions was on average below 230 m for the ceilometer and below 70 m for the lidar retrievals. The statistical analysis of the long-term observations indicated that the monthly mean ABLHs varied throughout the year between 0.6 and 1.8 km. The seasonal mean ABLH was of 1.16 ± 0.16 km in spring, 1.34 ± 0.15 km in summer, 0.99 ± 0.11 km in autumn, and 0.73 ± 0.08 km in winter. In spring and summer, the daytime and nighttime ABLHs appeared mainly in a frequency distribution range of 0.6 to 1.0 km. In winter, the distribution was common between 0.2 and 0.6 km. In autumn, it was relatively balanced between 0.2 and 1.2 km. The annual mean ABLHs maintained between 0.77 and 1.16 km, whereby the mean heights of the well-mixed, residual, and nocturnal layer were 1.14 ± 0.11, 1.27 ± 0.09, and 0.71 ± 0.06 km, respectively (for clear-sky conditions). For the whole observation period, the ABLHs below 1 km constituted more than 60% of the retrievals. A strong seasonal change of the monthly mean ABLH diurnal cycle was evident; a mild weakly defined autumn diurnal cycle, followed by a somewhat flat winter diurnal cycle, then a sharp transition to a spring diurnal cycle, and a high bell-like summer diurnal cycle. A prolonged summertime was manifested by the September cycle being more similar to the summer than autumn cycles.

[1]  I. Stachlewska,et al.  Interrelations between surface, boundary layer, and columnar aerosol properties derived in summer and early autumn over a continental urban site in Warsaw, Poland , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[2]  R. G. Carneiro,et al.  Observational analysis of the daily cycle of the planetary boundary layer in the central amazon during a typical year and under the influence of the ENSO (GoAmazon project 2014/5) , 2019 .

[3]  Shuwen Zhang,et al.  A Review of Techniques for Diagnosing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height (ABLH) Using Aerosol Lidar Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[4]  M. Komppula,et al.  Planetary boundary layer height by means of lidar and numerical simulations over New Delhi, India , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[5]  E. Żmudzka,et al.  Assessment of modern hydro‐meteorological hazards in a big city – identification for Warsaw , 2019, Meteorological Applications.

[6]  Tian Zhou,et al.  Atmosphere Boundary Layer Height (ABLH) Determination under Multiple-Layer Conditions Using Micro-Pulse Lidar , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[7]  J. Wyngaard,et al.  The Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2019, Wind Effects on Structures.

[8]  I. Stachlewska,et al.  Interrelations between surface, boundary layer, and columnar aerosol properties over a continental urban site , 2018 .

[9]  A. Pitman,et al.  The El Niño–Southern Oscillation’s effect on summer heatwave development mechanisms in Australia , 2018, Climate Dynamics.

[10]  C. Halios,et al.  Volume for pollution dispersion: London's atmospheric boundary layer during ClearfLo observed with two ground-based lidar types , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[11]  C. Grimmond,et al.  Atmospheric boundary‐layer characteristics from ceilometer measurements. Part 1: A new method to track mixed layer height and classify clouds , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[12]  C. Grimmond,et al.  Atmospheric boundary‐layer characteristics from ceilometer measurements. Part 2: Application to London's urban boundary layer , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[13]  Jean-Charles Dupont,et al.  ReOBS: a new approach to synthesize long-term multi-variable dataset and application to the SIRTA supersite , 2018 .

[14]  H. Baars,et al.  A methodology for cloud masking uncalibrated lidar signals , 2018 .

[15]  Dietrich Althausen,et al.  Modification of Local Urban Aerosol Properties by Long-Range Transport of Biomass Burning Aerosol , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Effect of Heat Wave Conditions on Aerosol Optical Properties Derived from Satellite and Ground-Based Remote Sensing over Poland , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Iwona S. Stachlewska,et al.  Temporal variations in optical and microphysical properties of mineral dust and biomass burning aerosol derived from daytime Raman lidar observations over Warsaw, Poland , 2017 .

[18]  Fabien Marnas,et al.  Raman Lidar Observations of Aerosol Optical Properties in 11 Cities from France to Siberia , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[19]  D. Althausen,et al.  Raman lidar water vapor profiling over Warsaw, Poland , 2017 .

[20]  A. Haefele,et al.  PathfinderTURB: an automatic boundary layer algorithm. Development, validation and application to study the impact on in situ measurements at the Jungfraujoch , 2017 .

[21]  M. Wiegner,et al.  Mixing layer height as an indicator for urban air quality , 2017 .

[22]  Peng Gao,et al.  Study of PBLH and Its Correlation with Particulate Matter from One-Year Observation over Nanjing, Southeast China , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[23]  M. Posyniak,et al.  Effects of urban agglomeration on surface-UV doses: a comparison of Brewermeasurements in Warsaw and Belsk, Poland, for the period 2013–2015 , 2016 .

[24]  Gary A. Morris,et al.  Comparison of aerosol lidar retrieval methods for boundary layer height detection using ceilometer aerosol backscatter data , 2016 .

[25]  Martial Haeffelin,et al.  Recommendations for processing atmospheric attenuated backscatter profiles from Vaisala CL31 ceilometers , 2016 .

[26]  Alexander Haefele,et al.  An empirical method to correct for temperature-dependent variations in theoverlap function of CHM15k ceilometers , 2016 .

[27]  M. Piringer,et al.  Mixing-Height Time Series from Operational Ceilometer Aerosol-Layer Heights , 2016, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[28]  Wenhui Xu,et al.  The strong El Niño of 2015/16 and its dominant impacts on global and China's climate , 2016, Journal of Meteorological Research.

[29]  I. Esau,et al.  Differences in the efficacy of climate forcings explained by variations in atmospheric boundary layer depth , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  Fei Chen,et al.  Impact of physics parameterizations on high‐resolution weather prediction over two Chinese megacities , 2016 .

[31]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  The automated multiwavelength Raman polarization and water-vapor lidar PollyXT: The neXT generation , 2016 .

[32]  R. Engelmann,et al.  An overview of the first decade of Polly NET : an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling , 2016 .

[33]  Ying Li,et al.  Application of the Ultraviolet Scanning Elastic Backscatter LiDAR for the Investigation of Aerosol Variability , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[34]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Combination Mode Dynamics of the Anomalous Northwest Pacific Anticyclone , 2015 .

[35]  Bertrand Calpini,et al.  Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model , 2014 .

[36]  Susanne Crewell,et al.  Mixing-layer height retrieval with ceilometer and Doppler lidar: from case studies to long-term assessment , 2014 .

[37]  Sandip Pal,et al.  Monitoring Depth of Shallow Atmospheric Boundary Layer to Complement LiDAR Measurements Affected by Partial Overlap , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[38]  W. Thomas,et al.  What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET , 2014 .

[39]  C. R. Wood,et al.  Observations of urban boundary layer structure during a strong urban heat island event , 2014, Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  A 19-Month Record of Marine Aerosol-Cloud-Radiation Properties Derived from DOE ARM Mobile Facility Deployment at the Azores. Part I: Cloud Fraction and Single-Layered MBL Cloud Properties , 2014 .

[41]  P. Sokol,et al.  Evaluation of the boundary layer morning transition using the CL-31 ceilometer signals , 2014, Acta Geophysica.

[42]  D. Seidel,et al.  Trends in Planetary Boundary Layer Height over Europe , 2013 .

[43]  J. Kukkonen,et al.  A Three-Step Method for Estimating the Mixing Height Using Ceilometer Data from the Helsinki Testbed , 2012 .

[44]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability of the atmospheric boundary layer depth over the Paris agglomeration: An assessment of the impact of the urban heat island intensity , 2012 .

[45]  A. Beljaars,et al.  Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the continental United States and Europe , 2012 .

[46]  A. Szkop,et al.  Ceilometer observations of the boundary layer over Warsaw, Poland , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[47]  Matthias Wiegner,et al.  Aerosol profiling with the Jenoptik ceilometer CHM15kx , 2012 .

[48]  G. Morris,et al.  Seasonal Variability in the Diurnal Evolution of the Boundary Layer in a Near-Coastal Urban Environment , 2012 .

[49]  Angelo Riccio,et al.  Automatic detection of atmospheric boundary layer height using ceilometer backscatter data assisted by a boundary layer model , 2012 .

[50]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Evaluation of Mixing-Height Retrievals from Automatic Profiling Lidars and Ceilometers in View of Future Integrated Networks in Europe , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[51]  Qiuhong Tang,et al.  Damped summer warming accompanied with cloud cover increase over Eurasia from 1982 to 2009 , 2012 .

[52]  Alexandros Papayannis,et al.  Inter-comparison of lidar and ceilometer retrievals for aerosol and Planetary Boundary Layer profiling over Athens, Greece , 2011 .

[53]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination , 2010 .

[54]  E. O'connor,et al.  A Method for Estimating the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar, and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements , 2010 .

[55]  Lindsay J. Bennett,et al.  Observations of the Evolution of the Nocturnal and Convective Boundary Layers and the Structure of Open-Celled Convection on 14 June 2002 , 2010 .

[56]  I. Esau,et al.  On the role of the planetary boundary layer depth in the climate system , 2010 .

[57]  Franz Rubel,et al.  Observed and projected climate shifts 1901-2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2010 .

[58]  Valentin Mitev,et al.  Frequency of Boundary-Layer-Top Fluctuations in Convective and Stable Conditions Using Laser Remote Sensing , 2010 .

[59]  Giovanni Martucci,et al.  Detection of Cloud-Base Height Using Jenoptik CHM15K and Vaisala CL31 Ceilometers , 2010 .

[60]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar , 2008 .

[61]  John C. Lin,et al.  Vertical mixing in atmospheric tracer transport models: error characterization and propagation , 2007 .

[62]  S. Brönnimann,et al.  Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation on European climate , 2007 .

[63]  Valentin Mitev,et al.  Comparison between Backscatter Lidar and Radiosonde Measurements of the Diurnal and Nocturnal Stratification in the Lower Troposphere , 2007 .

[64]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Retrieval of mixing height and dust concentration with lidar ceilometer , 2007 .

[65]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  STRAT: An Automated Algorithm to Retrieve the Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere from Single-Channel Lidar Data , 2007 .

[66]  K. Ridder,et al.  The surface energy balance and the mixing height in urban areas—activities and recommendations of COST-Action 715 , 2007 .

[67]  C. Deser,et al.  The Impact of Cloud Radiative Feedback, Remote ENSO Forcing, and Entrainment on the Persistence of North Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies , 2006 .

[68]  Jens Bösenberg,et al.  Determination of the convective boundary-layer height with laser remote sensing , 2006 .

[69]  J. M. Baldasano,et al.  Mixed-Layer Depth Determination in the Barcelona Coastal Area From Regular Lidar Measurements: Methods, Results and Limitations , 2006 .

[70]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Mixing height determination by ceilometer , 2005 .

[71]  C. Deser,et al.  Estimation of the Surface Heat Flux Response to Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies over the Global Oceans , 2005 .

[72]  Alexandros Papayannis,et al.  Vertical aerosol distribution over Europe: Statistical analysis of Raman lidar data from 10 European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) stations , 2004 .

[73]  I. Brooks,et al.  Finding Boundary Layer Top: Application of a Wavelet Covariance Transform to Lidar Backscatter Profiles , 2003 .

[74]  M. A. Lokoshchenko Long-Term Sodar Observations in Moscow and a New Approach to Potential Mixing Determination by Radiosonde Data , 2002 .

[75]  Raymond M. Hoff,et al.  The Detection of Mixed Layer Depth and Entrainment Zone Thickness from Lidar Backscatter Profiles , 1999 .

[76]  C. Flamant,et al.  Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the paris area. , 1999, Applied optics.

[77]  C. Flamant,et al.  LIDAR DETERMINATION OF THE ENTRAINMENT ZONE THICKNESS AT THE TOP OF THE UNSTABLE MARINE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER , 1997 .

[78]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations , 1996 .

[79]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[80]  K. Allwine,et al.  Extraterrestrial solar radiation on inclined surfaces , 1986 .

[81]  Beata Kręcisz,et al.  Urban Heat Island and Bioclimatic Comfort in Warsaw , 2016 .

[82]  M. Grunwald Structure Of The Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2016 .

[83]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[84]  C. Allery,et al.  Application of POD-based dynamical systems to dispersion and deposition of particles in turbulent channel flow , 2014 .

[85]  Adam A. Scaife Impact of ENSO on European Climate , 2012 .

[86]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Atmospheric boundary-layer structure from simultaneous SODAR, RASS, and ceilometer measurements , 2004 .

[87]  K. Fortuniak,et al.  Trends to changes in seasonal aspects of the climate in Poland , 2000 .

[88]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height , 2000 .

[89]  Gerhard Peters,et al.  Remote sensing of turbulent ozone fluxes and the ozone budget in the convective boundary layer with DIAL and Radar-RASS : A case study , 1996 .

[90]  T. Oke The Heat Island of the Urban Boundary Layer: Characteristics, Causes and Effects , 1995 .