Semantics and Syntax of Non-Standard Coordination.

Author(s): Paperno, Denis | Advisor(s): Keenan, Edward L | Abstract: This dissertation explores the diversity and unity of coordination constructions in natural language. Following the goal of bridging syntactic typology with formal semantics, it takes the typological variation in NP coordination patterns as a challenge for semantic theory. Hybrid Coordination in Rusian and Comitative Coordination in Q'anjob'al (Mayan) are two original empirical case studies of this dissertation. The main theoretical claims concern the semantics of conjunction. I propose two ways of relating sentential conjunction and NP conjunction semantically, and argue that each of them is beneficial for different coordination constructions in different languages.In Q'anjob'al, discussed in Chapter 2, coordinator yetoq `with/and' behaves as consistently non-boolean. I argue for treating its function as plurality formation on entities (for NP conjunction) or discourse units (for clausal conjunction), which helps explain constraints on its usage in both cases.Plurality formation, however, is not appropriate as an interpretive mechanism for Hybrid Coordination (HC), where conjoined phrases bear different thematic roles:Ljubov' --- eto kogda kto-to i kogo-to ljubit.love is when someone.NOM and someone.ACC loves`Love is when someone loves somebody'The syntactic and semantic properties of Hybrid Coordination in Russian are discussed in Chapters 3 and 4. Chapter 5 proposes a unified semantic account for syntactically diverse conjunction patterns based on game theoretic semantics. Sentential conjunction, NP conjunction, Hybrid Coordination, quantifier branching, and respectively-constructions can be successfully analyzed via parallel composition of games.The dissertation expands our knowledge of syntactic diversity of coordination by exploring syntactic differences between what seems to be identical constructions in different languages --- comitative coordination in Q'anjob'al and Russian, Hybrid Coordination in Russian and other languages. This work also makes a case for semantic diversity. On this front, the main conclusion simply put is that NP conjunction extended to sentences is not the same as sentential conjunction extended to NPs. On the other hand, I also make a case for semantic unity of various conjunction patterns; as argued in Chapter 5, coordination of NPs and sentences have common interpretive properties in what concerns quantifier (in)dependence and anaphora, and can be analyzed as semantically identical.

[1]  Javier Gutiérrez Rexach,et al.  Questions and Generalized Quantifiers , 1997 .

[2]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  Distributivity, Collectivity, and Cumulativity in Terms of (In)dependence and Maximality , 2011, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[3]  E. Keenan Beyond the frege boundary , 1992 .

[4]  Barbara Tomaszewicz,et al.  Against Spurious Coordination in Multiple Wh-questions , 2011 .

[5]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Reciprocity and plurality , 1991 .

[6]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Game-theoretical semantics : essays on semantics , 1979 .

[7]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Coordinating constructions: an overview , 2004 .

[8]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[9]  Sue Brown,et al.  The syntax of negation in Russian , 1999 .

[10]  J. Lambek The Mathematics of Sentence Structure , 1958 .

[11]  Dag Westerståhl,et al.  Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics , 1993, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[12]  Rui P. Chaves,et al.  On the Russian hybrid coordination construction , 2007, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[13]  Eung-Do Cook A Sarcee Grammar , 1984 .

[14]  Hajime Ono,et al.  An Investigation of Exclamatives in English and Japanese: Syntax and Sentence Processing , 2006 .

[15]  Lynn Gordon,et al.  Maricopa Morphology and Syntax , 1986 .

[16]  Peter Lasersohn Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[17]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity , 2008 .

[18]  Jaap M. van der Does Sums and quantifiers , 1993 .

[19]  Jos Camacho Structural Restrictions on Comitative Coordination , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Maxime Amblard,et al.  Minimalist Grammars and Minimalist Categorial Grammars: Toward Inclusion of Generated Languages , 2011, Logic and Grammar.

[21]  Radha Jagadeesan,et al.  Games and Full Completeness for Multiplicative Linear Logic , 1994, J. Symb. Log..

[22]  Louise Mcnally,et al.  Comitative coordination: A case study in group formation , 1993 .

[23]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  A semantic characterization of natural language determiners , 1986 .

[24]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  A cross-categorial semantics for coordination , 1980 .

[25]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: an assessment , 2022 .

[26]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[27]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Discourse Parallelism, Scope, and Ellipsis , 1997 .

[28]  Lydia Grebenyova Interpretation of Slavic Multiple Wh-Questions , 2004 .

[29]  Xavier Caicedo,et al.  Equivalence and quantifier rules for logic with imperfect information , 2009, Log. J. IGPL.

[30]  Jack Hoeksema,et al.  The Semantics of Non-Boolean "And" , 1988, J. Semant..

[31]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  STRUCTURED NOMINAL AND MODAL REFERENCE , 2008 .

[32]  Richard A. Demers,et al.  Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish , 1994 .

[33]  Godehard Link,et al.  Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals , 1987 .

[34]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[35]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Variation, Distributivity, and the Illusion of Branching , 1997 .

[36]  Rui P. Chaves,et al.  Coordinate Structures - Constraint-Based Syntax-Semantics Processing , 2007 .

[37]  Maxime Amblard,et al.  Categorial Minimalist Grammar , 2010, 1012.2661.

[38]  L. M. Faltz,et al.  Boolean semantics for natural language , 1984 .

[39]  J. Benthem Essays in Logical Semantics , 1986 .

[40]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Truth, Negation and Other Basic Notions of Logic , 2006 .

[41]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  A Compositional Game Semantics for Multi−Agent Logics of Partial Information , 2007 .

[42]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and the expres-sive power of natural language , 1985 .

[43]  Godehard Link The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[44]  Niina Ning Zhang,et al.  The syntactic derivations of two paired dependency constructions , 2007 .

[45]  Lipták Anikó,et al.  On the syntax of wh-items in Hungarian , 2001 .

[46]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .

[47]  A. Giannakidou,et al.  Reverse sluicing in English and Greek , 1998 .

[48]  L.M.H. Stassen,et al.  Noun Phrase Conjunction , 2005 .

[49]  P. Schlenker A Plea For Monsters , 2003 .

[50]  Bernd Heine,et al.  World Lexicon of Grammaticalization , 2019 .

[51]  Alda Mari Intensional Epistemic Wholes: A Study in the Ontology of Collectivity , 2005 .

[52]  Godehard Link Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy , 1997 .

[53]  T S Motzkin CONVEX TYPE VARIETIES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Alberto Cortes,et al.  Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle , 1976, Philosophy of Science.

[55]  Ezra Keshet,et al.  Focus on Conditional Conjunction , 2013, J. Semant..

[56]  B. Schein Plurals and Events , 1994 .

[57]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[58]  Friederike Moltmann,et al.  Coordination and comparatives , 1992 .

[59]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type‐shifting Principles , 2008 .

[60]  Martin Haspelmath Nominal and verbal conjunction , 2013 .

[61]  Isabel Gómez Txurruka The Natural Language Conjunction And , 2003 .

[62]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[63]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Quantifiers in language and logic , 2006 .

[64]  Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,et al.  Semantic games and generalised quantifiers , 2007 .

[65]  Pranav Anand,et al.  Shifty Operators in Changing Contexts , 2004 .

[66]  ALEXANDER GROSU,et al.  SUBCATEGORIZATION AND PARALLELISM , 1985 .

[67]  Alexandre Arkhipov,et al.  Comitative as a cross-linguistically valid category , 2009 .

[68]  Darya Kavitskaya,et al.  Hamblin pronouns in modal existential wh-constructions , 2009 .

[69]  Alistair Knott,et al.  A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations , 1996 .

[70]  Katalin É. Kiss,et al.  Wh-movement and specificity , 1993 .

[71]  M. Dalrymple,et al.  Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity , 1998 .

[72]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Coordination and how to distinguish categories , 1985 .

[73]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  The semantics of variety in categorial grammar , 1988 .

[74]  Alexander Grosu,et al.  On acceptable violations of parallelism constraints , 1987 .

[75]  G. OttoSchumann,et al.  La lengua chol, de Tila (Chiapas) , 1973 .

[76]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Negation in Logic and in Natural Language , 2002 .

[77]  EDWARD L. KEENAN,et al.  THE ABSORPTION OPERATOR AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 1986 .

[78]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Quantifying into Question Acts , 1999 .

[79]  LEON STASSEN,et al.  AND-languages and WITH-languages , 2000 .

[80]  Philip Neal Whitman,et al.  Category Neutrality: A Type-Logical Investigation , 2004 .

[81]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  Logic Games are Complete for Game Logics , 2003, Stud Logica.

[82]  Ileana Comorovski,et al.  Interrogative phrases and the syntax-semantics interface , 1996 .

[83]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[84]  Robert May,et al.  Interpreting logical form , 1989 .

[85]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  The Semantics of the Russian Comitative Construction , 1998 .

[86]  Dag Westerståhl Branching Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language , 1987 .

[87]  G. Sher Ways of branching quantifers , 1990 .

[88]  Rui P. Chaves,et al.  Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings1 , 2012, Journal of Linguistics.

[89]  N. A. Mccawley,et al.  The structure of the Japanese language , 1973 .

[90]  Andrej A. Kibrik 18. Coordination in Upper Kuskokwim Athabaskan , 2004 .

[91]  L. Karttunen Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[92]  K. Jon Barwise,et al.  On branching quantifiers in English , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[93]  Helma E. van den Berg 8. Coordinating constructions in Daghestanian languages , 2004 .

[94]  ROBERT MAY,et al.  Questions, quantifiers and crossing , 1981 .