Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets

Abstract This study examines the relationship between individual differences in the behaviour of sows, Sus scrofa , and piglet mortality caused by crushing. Continuous 24-h video recordings were made of 11 loose-housed sows and their litters during parturition, and during the following 10 days. Each sow and litter were kept in a pen with a straw-bedded nest-site. Piglets were defined as in danger of being crushed if they were trapped by the sow's body or if they jumped aside in response to the lying down or rolling behaviour of the sow at the nest-site. An overall score (derived from five behavioural measures) of the quality of sow behaviour in relation to crushing was computed for each sow. This score was significantly correlated with the number of piglets in danger in each litter during the first 10 days after farrowing. The 11 sows were also scored with respect to their responsiveness to playbacks of piglet distress calls. Sows with a high responsiveness had fewer of their trapped piglets crushed. Both the score of the quality of sow behaviour and the score of the sows' responsiveness to piglet distress calls were significantly negatively correlated with the percentage of liveborn piglets (born several months before or after the present study) in which crushing was the primary cause of death. In conclusion, our results provide evidence that the occurrence of crushing is significantly related to individual differences in sow behaviour.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  A. Fraser,et al.  Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare , 1990 .

[3]  G. Cronin,et al.  The effect of piglet stimuli on the posture changing behaviour of recently farrowed sows , 1991 .

[4]  D. Wood‐Gush,et al.  The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. , 1984, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[5]  J. Bortz,et al.  Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik , 1982 .

[6]  P. Jensen.  Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs , 1986 .

[7]  E. S. E. Hafez,et al.  The behaviour of domestic animals , 1963 .

[8]  K. Bøe.  Variation in maternal behaviour and production of sows in integrated loose housing systems in Norway , 1994 .

[9]  E. Swierstra,et al.  CAUSES OF PIGLET DEATH FROM BIRTH TO WEANING , 1987 .

[10]  E. Price,et al.  The effect of playback volume and duration on the response of sows to piglet distress calls , 1993 .

[11]  P. Jensen.  Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow , 1989 .

[12]  Judith K. Blackshaw,et al.  Comparison of behaviour patterns of sows and litters in a farrowing crate and a farrowing pen , 1994 .

[13]  B. Luxford,et al.  Influence of parity and time since parturition on responsiveness of sows to a piglet distress call , 1992 .

[14]  E. S. E. Hafez,et al.  The Behaviour of Swine , 1975 .

[15]  J. Svendsen.  Occurrence and causes of traumatic injuries in neonatal pigs , 1986 .

[16]  D. Fraser,et al.  Behavioural perspectives on piglet survival. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[17]  J. L. Wilkinson,et al.  The response of lactating sows to tactile, visual and auditory stimuli associated with a model piglet , 1991 .